Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there anybody in the GOP presidential candidate field who is qualified to be commander in chief?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 09:23 PM
Original message
Is there anybody in the GOP presidential candidate field who is qualified to be commander in chief?
I just can't for the life of me imagine any one of these as of yet undeclared candidates as a credible commander in chief of our military.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. The very idea that any of the participants in this side show
as president gives me the willies, hives, indigestion, you name it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Wannabees persist with moot drivel and band aids....no ideas cept for their Masters
1 control

2 dominate

3 Dictate

That is their mission....

to FOOL

is to RULE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. an elected president is automatically qualified by the constitution nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sure there are!
Edited on Thu Jan-20-11 09:54 PM by solara
Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Joe Lieberman, Tom Coburn, Lindsay Graham, Mitch McConnell, Jeb Bush. And I am sure I have forgotten a few other good ones. Why, there is a veritable smorgasbord of viable and willing candidates. They all have fantastic military creds too, so it's a no brainer. :shrug: (literally)

Obama is going down..even -he- cannot withstand the onslaught of these brilliant and thoroughly modern neo-con political minds.


Then we have the dream team of Palin/Bachman but I don't know enough about their military connections to include them in my "most likely to" list.

:evilgrin: :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Republicans? No Brainer?....Dude!!!!....
:freak:


:rofl:

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is sort of hard to throw rocks on this issue when the last two Democratic
Presidents have had no connection to the military. We are entering an age when the draft ceased to exist and it will be rare that a politician served in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You don't have to have served in the military to understand it.
You do, however, have to have a brain in your head and the ability to make good decisions. Historically, there's really no connection to whether having been in the military makes you qualified to run it. The only thing FDR would have known about being in the military was how to shoot a gun, but that didn't stop him from leading the US to the brink of victory in the biggest war ever fought by humankind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. That is utterly ridiculous.
Roosevelt was Assistant Secretary of the Navy from 1913 -1920. Besides WW I, during that time period Roosevelt founded the Naval Reserves and held meetings with Churchill during WW I. After the war he was placed in charge of demobilization. And you are saying he just knew how to shoot a gun? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Asst. Secretary of the Navy is a civilian administrator position.
It doesn't make you a member of the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Duh , I get that.
But in that position for seven years you get to know a whole lot about the military and it is absurd to suggest otherwise. Any one who is in a senior administrator position meeting with world leaders knows a hell of a lot more about the military than a "member of the military". But I'm sure that will not stop you from strangling facts and logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. And pray tell, what precisely were Obama's qualifications to be CIC when he took office?
For that matter, what in his resume qualified him to be president?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The year is 2011, not 2008
We're here and this is now. The past is just that. The past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Yep, but it still applies.
As much as I can't think of one Republican who I would wish to win the WH, it is disingenuous to ask how qualified any of them are when Obama had a wafer thin resume when he ran in 2008.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. The baggers think Sarah Palin is, you betcha! "We're puttin' a crosshairs target on ALL them
foreign countries! We're gonna fly those radio-controlled 'clone-thingys' over 'em & bomb, bomb, bomb the heck out of 'em! Oooh, havin' this red phone sure is fun -- I might get one for every room; Bristol, Track, & little Trig can help monitor them when Mom's busy with her Fixed News exclusive interviewin'."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Age + citizenship = sure!
And getting elected.

It cuts both ways.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. has there ever been?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-11 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, Petraeus should be OK for the military side of things.
Of course he would not necessarily be strong in any other fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. Basil Marceaux
If you don't know him, Google him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC