Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Open Letter to a Heritage Foundation Hack RE: Drug Testing of People on Welfare

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
scoobiedavis Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 11:14 AM
Original message
My Open Letter to a Heritage Foundation Hack RE: Drug Testing of People on Welfare
I posted this letter on my blog (check it for links, etc.). I was so incensed when I watched Genevieve Wood, a smug hypocrite arguing that a drug test should be a precondition for welfare. If you want to alert her of my letter email her at staff@heritage.org and put "Genevieve Wood" in the subject heading. Here's my open letter:

An Open Letter to Genevieve Wood of the Heritage Foundation

Dear Ms. Wood,

I saw you on the PBS public affairs panel show To the Contrary the other day. The topic of discussion was drug testing of welfare recipients. You defended the practice by pointing out that your employer, the Heritage Foundation, had required you to take a drug test as a precondition of employment.

When I heard this, I thought, “What the fuck is the deal with that?!” I mean, did some Heritage Foundation lackey actually stand over you and watch you piss in a jar? That’s really kinky (albeit an unerotic, creepy type of kink).

However, the issues run deeper. Why would a phony think tank that exists for the sole purpose of producing pseudo-scholarly position papers that support right-wing talking points (see postscript) need to have its gravy train riders drug-free? Rush Limbaugh was able to competently deliver wing-nut boilerplate even though he was taking enough hillbilly heroin to keep the entire state of Kentucky stoned to the bone. Providing phony research for the hard right must be the easiest gig on God’s green earth. For fuck’s sake, it’s petty for Heritage to deny its operatives an opportunity to take the edge off their feelings of existential angst when they’re cooking the data to argue that the tax code has given the top one percent of income earners a raw deal over the past 30 years.

Also, when I watched you on TV, you seemed to be wound up way too tight. You could use some weed. Do a few bong hits, loosen the corset, unclench your sphincter muscles, and pop in a Harold and Kumar DVD. You’ll feel better.

Sincerely,

S


Postscript: Candid Statement about the Heritage Foundation’s Real Agenda by Burton Pines, Vice President for Research for the Heritage Foundation: “We’re not here to be some kind of Ph. D. committee giving equal time. Our role is to provide conservative policy-makers with arguments to bolster our side.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. People who deduct mortgage interest on their taxes should be drug tested.
It's receiving welfare, after all.


And GIs taking college tuition.

And CEOs taking bailout money.

And people who deduct their children from their taxes.

And people who are blind and/or over age 65.

And people on Medicare.

And people on Medicaid.

And people on Social Security.

And...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, that's not going to land.
It's the kind of incoherent, profane screed that they'll easily dismiss as the 'typical' rantings of the left.

A missed opportunity - disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. If anyone should be drug tested it's the police and politicians. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Heritage Foundation is a bastion of fascism. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbrtbell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. While I agree with you, the tone of your letter wasn't good
Nobody's going to listen to someone who drops the F-bomb, suggests smoking marijuana, etc.

That sort of language is fun here on DU (hey, I use it myself!), but in a business letter, it's just not appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scoobiedavis Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. About the tone
I noticed some people didn't like the tone. Keep in mind, this wasn't an attempt at persuasion. It was meant to be completely insulting. We're dealing with a dour, soulless ideologue. She can't be persuaded. Insults and ridicule are what are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Of course *she* can't be persuaded.
Edited on Mon Nov-28-11 12:37 PM by Bunny
But you could have used the opportunity to try to persuade those who might be able to see reason. Tone, language, etc. can make a difference in that context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You could have pointed out that the drug-test-for-welfare program in Florida is a huge failure
At least make an effort to address her position.

If meant as an insult, it also failed because I guarantee she shitcanned it at the first 'fuck'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stratosgc Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Heritage Foundation running the country
The Heritage Foundation was created by the merchants of doubt working to generate bogus technical papers for the cigarette companies, the electric power companies and Dow Chemical to convince the gullible that acid rain was not a problem, nor was CFCs, nor second hand smoke. Now they are dictating policy to our legislators. Who elected them? Our government had a program called the Advanced Technology Program that was extremely successful (1988 to 2008) in facilitating the development of new technologies and entire new high tech industries in America. It created hundreds of thousands of good paying jobs. The program was so successful that most of the EU countries and many other countries around the world copied it. A guy named Riddle at the Heritage Foundation earned a high 6 figure salary writing essays against ATP. Riddle and the Heritage Foundation killed ATP. Future technologies will be developed but not in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's classism
One of the numerous little myths that Americans use to assure themselves of how wonderful capitalism is, is that poor people are poor by their own fault. It assumes that the poor aren't just unlucky but there must be something wrong with them. The USA is so committed to capitalism as part of it's national myth (approaching national religion) that the country would rather believe such fairy tales about the poor (and others, such as poor people being fat) than accept that capitalism is going to have winners and losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC