Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Many have correctly pointed out that we don't really know all the details of just why Keith Olberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Atticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:29 PM
Original message
Many have correctly pointed out that we don't really know all the details of just why Keith Olberman
no longer has a job with MSNBC, but that does not mean that it is too early to be angry and disgusted.

What we do know is that Keith Olberman was, and is, our friend. Keith was there with us through some of the darkest days of the Bush administration. He was, for a time, the solitary flickering candle in that darkness and was, for many of us, the only daily evidence that we were not alone in our despair for our beautiful country.

Keith was wicked smart, but was able to communicate his view of things without the slightest hint of condescension. As diverse as we, his viewers, were, he was "one of us". And, like most of us, he treated politics as a vital concern, not a game where the object was simply scoring points.

Keith had his rough edges, like we all do. That comes with being genuine. He did not get "perturbed" or "vexed", but he did occasionally get pissed. And, when Keith got pissed, he swatted down gnats like O'Reilly and Limbaugh and Palin. And, this, as much as anything, in my view, is why Keith had to go.

Regardless of the terms of his departure, whether he was fired or he resigned or whatever, it is clear that Keith Olberman could not become the "team player" that corporate America demands. He was not programmed to simply smile and nod and read the telemprompter on cue. He talked to us, not at us and he told us something that the self-styled Masters of the Universe didn't want us to hear:

the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. He will land somewhere, don't know when or how
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And we will be there to catch him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I hope so....but somehow I'm not seeing the possibility. stupid stupid NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not the first time, that he walks out that is
He may have quit, they may have put the axe on him, most likely a lovely combo...

But this is the media consolidation stupid as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yea. Unlike those that lie when they want to take someone down. KO was a gentleman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. He may not have been a team player,but he joined the team,and
accepted a very hefty salary to be part of the team.

Sorry to see him leave but he'll be back,somwhere,sometime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
travelingtypist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. And we all want to know the real story.
I have a feeling we never will.

I am going to miss him. I'll latch onto Rachel as a lifeline, but Ed and Lawrence are wanting substitutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe he's going to be Obama's next press secretary.
Wouldn't that be something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I was thinking just the same thing!...
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 08:04 PM by cascadiance
Though the way Obama's administration has been lately, he might even have more of a problem "smiling" while speaking for them than he had with MSNBC...

Also, on thinking on this some more, I'm not sure Keith would want to work for the administration that let the Comcast/NBC merger go through, which arguably put him in to the predicament he is in now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. I do hope we learn more details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think we do. As soon as we heard COmcast was allowed to buy MSNBC, we
all knew exactly what would happen. He didn't resign. He wouldn't resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R ! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. It is too early.
Anger and disgust with whom, precisely, and about what, precisely? Let's just wait for some information before we decide to indulge emotions which have already been exercised to the point of addiction, shall we? Your speculation as to the cause may well be correct, but it is just that, speculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. You don't have to use, 'has' and 'was'. 'is' and 'will' sounds a lot better.
Edited on Sat Jan-22-11 01:54 AM by Kablooie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC