Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reich - American Competitiveness, and the President’s New Relationship with American Business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 03:21 PM
Original message
Reich - American Competitiveness, and the President’s New Relationship with American Business
http://robertreich.org/post/2863461038

Whenever you hear a business executive or politician use the term “American competitiveness,” watch your wallet. Few terms in public discourse have gone so directly from obscurity to meaninglessness without any intervening period of coherence.

President Obama just appointed Jeffry Immelt, GE’s CEO, to head his outside panel of economic advisors, replacing Paul Volcker. According to White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, Immelt has “agreed to work thorugh what makes our country more competitive.”

In an opinion piece in the Washington Post announcing his acceptance, Immelt wrote “there is nothing inevitable about America’s declining manufacturing competitiveness if we work together to reverse it.”

But what’s American “competitiveness” and how do you measure it? Here are some different definitions:

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. "competitiveness" means Americans working for 3rd world wages
When the standard of living and employment conditions for us has gotten as bad as those in countries who exploit their labor, American jobs will return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. When you compete with sweatshops,
even if you win, you lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. and working 3 or 4 jobs to eat, 2 hrs sleep and do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. US politicians elected by the middle class to serve the needs of the wealthy corporate class nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. “American competitiveness” means "Your CEO's salary must be world-class"
and time to update your resume, or go back to school to learn something high-tech so you can get a high-tech job until your high-tech job is outsourced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Ha! Reminds me of teaching, when Admins said we couln't ask for salary "parity" with
bordering districts.
ONLY THEY COULD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, what is good for American people is Not the same as
what is good for American corporations.

It is amazing how that always gets ignored in all the high level commentary, deliberately, when all the new policies and plans only help the corporations and not the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent as usual.
Professor Reich gets it. He belongs in a command position where he can save the U.S. economy from self-serving Wall Street profiteering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I certainly agree with you on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-22-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I sensed that Obama got it.
He campaigned on "bottom-up" economics. What the hell happened to that?

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The 1%ers overruled his equitable econ intellectual property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Extremely low wages, gutted safety regs, no health bennies, temp jobs: Voila'! COMPETITIVENESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC