Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA'S OFFICIAL 2008 CAMPAIGN BLOGGER: Why is Obama leaving the grass roots on the sidelines?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:17 PM
Original message
OBAMA'S OFFICIAL 2008 CAMPAIGN BLOGGER: Why is Obama leaving the grass roots on the sidelines?
Why is Obama leaving the grass roots on the sidelines?
By Sam Graham-Felsen
Friday, December 17, 2010

In the wake of President Obama's deal to extend the Bush tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans, pundits have focused on how Obama has alienated the left. But the issue isn't the left - it's the list.

Obama entered the White House with more than a landslide victory over Sen. John McCain. He brought with him a vast network of supporters, instantly reachable through an unprecedented e-mail list of 13 million people. These supporters were not just left-wing activists but a broad coalition that included the young, African Americans, independents and even Republicans - and they were ready to be mobilized.

I worked as Obama's chief blogger during his presidential campaign, and my primary focus was telling the stories of these supporters, many of whom had never been engaged in politics or were reengaging after years of disillusionment. There was a common thread in my conversations with the hundreds of people who gave time, sweat and small donations - that amounted to $500 million - to Obama's campaign.

They were inspired by Obama's promise to upend Washington by governing from the bottom up. "The change we need doesn't come from Washington," Obama told them. "It comes to Washington."

Yet at seemingly every turn, Obama has chosen to play an inside game. Instead of actively engaging supporters in major legislative battles, Obama has told them to sit tight as he makes compromises behind closed doors...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/16/AR2010121606083.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Damned good article. Everyone all the way up to Michael Moore has commented on...
...the bizarre behavior after he became president, effectively shutting the door very quickly behind him.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. This doesn't match my experience.
For example, I received two emails and a text message asking me to pressure Mark Kirk to support the repeal of DADT.

On health care, OFA organized door-to-door canvassing to build support. Which of the progressive groups heckling Obama did that? Certainly not PCCC, which sent out fundraising emails to benefit themselves by bashing Obama.

I don't know what Sam is writing about. OFA contacts me about legislative battles all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change has come Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Were you notified when the public option was taken off the table?
:shrug:

Did you get a text asking you to push your congressmen to fight for the 99ers when they lost their complete safety net this past summer?

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'm also disappointed that the Senate took the public option off the table.
Yes, I got an email asking me to pressure Congress on that issue, since they are the ones who blocked it. Maybe we would have won if more of the netroots had joined the fight to pressure Senators instead of putting all the focus on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. We did just that.
And it would have helped if Pres. Obama hadn't done an immediate reversal where he pretended he never campaigned on a P.O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Why, no. Nor did I get an email explaining why single payer was never even
discussed on its merits as a long-term goal to be working toward. We seem to always be starting with the most politically convenient "solution" instead of considering what the "best" one might be, and then compromising even the expedient one down into something near doomed to failure. Just once, could we deal in facts and think about long term solutions for the country and its people first before we bog ourselves down in political wheeling and dealing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. According to the OP, OFA was silent on this tax plan.
You throw out examples of other areas where they were active but ignore this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. 5 minutes at the OFA sites proves that statement is false.
One example of many: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/ericasagrans/gGMkFy

FYI, I just got another text and email about the vote to repeal DADT. Another example that the OP article is based on a false premise. When repeal passes the Senate we'll have Obama and OFA to thank for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. He watched aas his base stayed home for the midterms so
he figures he needs a new base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. He used the people he pretended were his base to get elected. Now he no longer needs to pretend.
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 12:01 AM by katandmoon
His under-bus-tossing aim is Olympic class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. You have it in reverse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Liberal turnout in 2010 was as high as it was in 2006.
The difference was that moderates and conservatives deserted us for the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Exactly. THAT is why the progressive caucus INCREASED in size...
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 09:45 PM by BrklynLiberal
while the BlueDogs lost seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. They served their purpose
and he has moved on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I unsubscribed from OFA after the health care debate.
HCR helped a lot of people but too many people were left out. Without any curbs to health care insurance premiums it was a sell-out as I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. "left wing"
These people were necessary to get elected, but Obama had to know that once in, he would have to tack to the right/center to operate, and why stay in contact with millions of people who were pissed off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. He makes a good point about 2012
With Citizens United, Obama would need at least twice the money he raised from the grassroots. Plus he can't afford to let 13 million people, "once heralded as a force that could reshape politics as we know it" sit idle, then drift away.

It's so obvious to me he's not planning to run



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. One wonders then, especially with the Billionaires Bonus he got them, what his goals would be for a
second term, anyway.

So far, beneficiaries have been Big Insurance, the M-I C, billionaires, and Big Finance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. He's too arrogant not to run. He and Clinton can fill a black hole in space with their egos. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Once in, he was given the word: Play Ball, or Else. And "else" ain't tiddly-winks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wow.
Sing it, brother! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Because they were gullible enough to vote and give $ for good soundbites nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. He Doesn't Need Us... He Has Newer, Cooler, Friends...
And they have money.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. He never supported Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm on the list, and most of us think he's doing fine
Thanks for the concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Gee, there's a shock. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. Sam Graham-Felsen seems naive
Face it, we got fooled again. No mystery about it. It's amazing to me how long it takes some people to get this.

Too bad we can't use this list to mobilize for REAL change. Any chance of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. EFFED FOR THE LAST TIME...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC