Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whistle-blowing teachers targeted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:24 PM
Original message
Whistle-blowing teachers targeted
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 09:24 PM by Starry Messenger
http://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta/whistle-blowing-teachers-targeted-812369.html


His bosses had no trouble dismissing Ryan Abbott’s report of cheating on standardized tests in an Atlanta school. They simply cast him in a self-fulfilling role, Abbott says: “disgruntled teacher.”

<snip>

Abbott was already on probation, after four years at Benteen Elementary. His students had not posted the big increases in test scores seen in other classrooms. Yet he had the audacity to level charges against a popular colleague. After word of Abbott’s allegations spread through the school, Benteen’s principal opened an ethics case — against him.

<snip>

The newspaper reviewed reports of the school district’s internal investigations and spoke with more than a dozen current and former Atlanta educators. The documents and the interviews describe a culture that punishes employees who report wrongdoing and rewards those who keep silent. Some whistle-blowers end up under scrutiny themselves. Others are subjected to questions about their mental health. Some lose their jobs.

<snip>

LITTLE PROTECTION

In Atlanta, as in other Georgia school districts, teachers have little job security. Even those with tenure work under year-to-year contracts, and they have no collective bargaining rights. Younger teachers, in particular, say that if they run afoul of administrators, they risk being “non-renewed.”



This is why teachers are protective of unions and tenure. This is the kind of thing that can happen in a place with little protection. Saying "less job security" would lead to "less complacency" is total nonsense and show a lack of knowledge of school culture in general.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. kr. this must be why georgia's schools are so great, right? teachers have no job security,
districts can fire them whenever -- so their students must be fantastic.

lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. All you have to do is fudge the test sheets.
Your students will be even better! Just get rid of the troublemakers who try to uncover your little scheme and you're an education miracle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. yay for smart teachers like those! students can learn from them!
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 06:41 PM by Hannah Bell
how to succeed in the new dog eat dog america!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Georgia to start grading teachers on "value" added
http://www.reading.org/General/Publications/blog/BlogSinglePost/10-12-20/Georgia_to_start_grading_teachers_on_value_added.aspx


Posted by:

Monday, December 20, 2010

Should parents know how well their children’s teachers score on effectiveness scales?

Using its federal Race to the Top grant, Georgia will start grading teachers in part on how much “value” they have added to a student’s learning, based on progress reflected in test scores.

“For teacher effectiveness measure, 50% will be based on the academic growth of students,” said Erin Hames, chief of staff at the Georgia Department of Education and the coordinator of the state’s Race to the Top efforts. But while parents will be able get the average teacher effectiveness scores for a school, they will not be privy to individual job ratings, says Hames.

Read more in this opinion piece by Maureen Downey in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution online.



What did people think was going to happen? You tie teacher-pay to test scores, teachers know they are against a hopeless system. It's just going to encourage cheating, and pit teacher against teacher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. that's the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ryan Abbott's a pretty interesting figure.
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 06:38 PM by msanthrope
He should get himself a good lawyer, as I suspect he's going to be a prime figure in the lawsuit Evans filed against the Atlanta Public Schools.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QK2gmXBo4QYJ:www.dailyreportonline.com/Editorial/News/singleEdit.asp%3Findividual_SQL%3D1%252F21%252F2011%254037254+atlanta+public+schools+union+evans+cheating&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Are these teachers unionized? If so, has the union said which side they are supporting?

If what Abbott says is true, Evans should be fired immediately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. georgia is a right to work state. no collective bargaining, short-term contracts,
teachers can be fired essentially at will.

you don't have to belong to a union to teach in georgia; you don't have to pay dues.

that's why their students are so excellent, don't you know.

head & tails above those unionized states.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. kickage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. k n r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Solidarity!
keep educating! It's not just the kids who need it. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. lol! So true.
Thank you Mary, solidarity. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. My pleasure
morning kick for you! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is "targeted" still a word we can use with all the letters, that doesn't need
asterisks replacing some of the letters, as in "ta****ed"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. ??
I'm unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. 'Targeted' and 'cross hairs' recently became inflammatory words. But
if they are disguised by using * to replace letters, they should still be usable and/or less inflammatory, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I must have missed that episode.
Was this on DU? Is it in the rules? I quoted a news article...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. No, it is not in the rules. But some folks will put asterisks in words rather
than all the letters in order to be less offensive (I guess.) Examples could be the 'n' word, using asterisk/letter combination. My argument agains this has always been if the reader sees such a thing, that reader knows what the writer means and if were to be offensive normally, it would still be so. Either use the whole word, or avoid it.

Other examples I've seen are G*d, D*mn, f**k, and so on.

So, no, there is no such rule, but with the seeming all-consuming quest for PC, one never knows when a word will be deemed offensive. Personally, words written on a page are not offensive to me, unless they are directed at someone. They could be to some, but not to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Well, "targeted" is a common everyday word.
No one has said anything about it so far, so I guess we're all good here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. My hairs are cross reading this...
;) evening kick too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC