RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 06:35 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Do you think there should be more protection for the lives of members of congress than everyone else... |
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They have helped create the problem |
Cirque du So-What
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The lives of members of Congress are no more valuable than the lives of anyone else |
|
but they are 'high-value targets' in the eyes of those who believe political assassination is a valid scheme to accomplish their goals. Besides, I want our reps & senators to be accessible to their constituents - not sequestered behind plexiglas or otherwise isolated.
|
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No, if they want to pay for it out of their pocket |
|
that's fine. Their lives are no more important than any other person. They already get too many fucking perks.
|
SheilaT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. More to the point, what happened in |
|
Tucson was an aberration. Maybe Loughner was inspired by the hate rhetoric coming from the right. Even if that's what set him off, how many thousands, maybe millions, are listening to Beck and Palin and Limbaugh and all the rest, and most of them are not buying guns and 30 round ammunition clips and going off shooting anyone.
Another thing is that Representatives and Senators need to stay as close to the people they represent as possible, and heavy-duty protection would eliminate that. They're pretty isolated as it is.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:04 PM
Response to Original message |