mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 08:42 AM
Original message |
Did WikiLeaks just declare war on the NY Times? |
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message |
1. A hopeless government shrill?...nt |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. That's what they said. |
|
Maybe they are remembering Judy and WMDs.
|
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Very possibly the intent. :D
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I know I'll never forget it. |
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
8. This is the future of journalism? |
Robb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Perhaps it's a morpheme-free nominalization. |
|
Wikileakistically clever.
|
elias49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:09 AM
Response to Original message |
6. I don't TWEET so I'm confused. |
|
Who wrote the TWEET? Is there any way to know? Is that a 'Wikileaks ad(?) at bottom, left or does this act as a signature. I don't understand!!!
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Here is their twitter: |
elias49
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
So essentially a Twitter ACCOUNT identifies where the message comes from. And as I see, there is ongoing chatter...just never bothered to learn what that medium was all about. Seems a little like online vomitting...no offense to Wiki - Tweeting appears to be just 'running off at the mouth'.(One of my Dad's fav expressions).
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:36 AM
Original message |
Running off at the mouth, but in short concise statements. |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 10:36 AM by mmonk
|
DCKit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Over the past twelve years, the NYT has gone from being an internationally touted "paper of record" to being a complete nag of a rag.
The last time they called me to subscribe, I told them only their comics and horoscope had any credibility.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
10. The NYT may be flawed, but I wouldn't want it to go away |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
11. IMHO, Judith Miller was part of the over-arching Repub plan to make ALL ESTEEMED media SUSPECT. |
|
IOW: Judith Miller was a Trojan horse.
See: CBS and the punking of Dan Rather.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |