Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charming letter to the editor posted this morning;

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:11 AM
Original message
Charming letter to the editor posted this morning;
Check out this :sarcasm: charming :sarcasm: letter to the editor that was in the local paper this morning;

First, Sarah Palin reacted as any Mamma Grizzly would, being so unfairly and so cruelly linked in the national media to the cold-blooded murder of a 9-year-old child.

Second, had there been a good guy or gal with a gun at the shooting site, lives would have been saved, injuries reduced and a mass murderer quickly dealt with.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. The guy with the gun almost shot the wrong person...
It was actually brave people without weapons who jumped the shooter and held him down until the police arrived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't let facts spoil a perfectly good argument
And indeed, no amount of facts will ever penetrate some skulls. At least not like a good hollow-point or black talon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, I know that
I said as much in the comments section. It's still early so the local right wing keyboard commando brigade hasn't written any responses yet, but I imagine they'll all be defending the guy and his letter and dismissing that the wrong guy almost got shot as some sort of liberal nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Not really
The two you refer to used their shoot/no shoot judgment and did not shoot each other or anyone else. They were responsible. Also, not all of the people who restrained the shooter were unarmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yupp!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. It isn't the duty or the purpose
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 11:34 AM by pipoman
of concealed carry laws to arm the public for protection of others. The purpose is to afford personal protection/self defense for the person carrying the firearm and nothing else. If during the coarse of legally carrying a firearm, a citizen is able to positively effect a criminal act...that is good.

Maybe if there had been a law enforcement presence at this meeting injuries and death could have been averted...as it is it took 15 minutes for law enforcement to get on scene and 30 minutes for EMS...and these are our paid protectors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then we could have called it...
The Second Shootout at the OK Corrall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC