Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arizona GOPer: Roe v. Wade Contributed To Tucson Shootings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:08 PM
Original message
Arizona GOPer: Roe v. Wade Contributed To Tucson Shootings
Source: TalkingPointsMemo.com

Arizona State Sen. Linda Gray (R) argued over the weekend that gun control is not the way to prevent another shooting like the one in Tucson. The real answer, she said when asked about preventing such a shooting in the future, is to better "respect the life of an unborn."

"It is ironic that today is the day 38 years ago that the Supreme Court said we do not have to respect the life of an unborn and we have gone through now more then a generation of people, a large number of people who believe that it is fine to take an infant prior to it being born and to kill it. What type of respect is that for human life?"

Politico's Ben Smith reports that Gray did an interview Sunday on George Washington University Radio's "Political Pulse," and said:

So now we have this generation of people who have that idea and it continues on, that why respect life if we can kill an infant who can't defend themselves. It goes back to the value in the creation of life and the respect for that life and if your not trained and have that type of character in realizing that all human life deserves respect this is what our country has come to.

Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/01/az-goper-roe-v-wade-contributed-to-tucson-shootings.php



When asked whether she thinks "that it is a cultural issue that is leading our youth into delinquency and into committing acts like this," Gray replied: "Yes, I believe part of it is a cultural issue in the disrespect for human life."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. But killing people in Afghanistan and Iraq is A-okay...
and murdering doctors is okay. And executing people is okay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We just need to make really smart bullets that don't kill pregnant women.
And that also won't kill the tiny babies that live in our sperm.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I blame Elvis and his hip-shaking hillbilly music.
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 04:11 PM by Ian David
:sarcasm:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. The more they talk...
The more stupid they show themselves to be.

Yak it up, dumbasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Yeah, but they make their listeners into slightly bigger idiots each time they say these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. she got it exactly backwards. Roe v Wade led to the decline in crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a pile of bulls**t!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monique1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good Grief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. I have met Linda Gray at asked her questions about education
She seems like a direct disciple of Jan Brewer. Wow, is she out of touch with reality.

Where are the facts, Linda?

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Maybe the Tucson shooting was just misogyny.
Lochner wrote "Die Bitch" on the letter Giffords' office sent him.

Roe v. Wade was a decision respecting female reproductive dominion.

State Senator Gray should try to reconcile these additional pertinent facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. They make the stupid remarks;
And we dubunk them. Too bad the populace hears their sound bite and can't give a crap for our rebuttal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. If Linda Gray had been aborted we wouldn't have to listen to this insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. If X is a recent tragedy, and Y is something I don't like, then Y caused X.
That's the "reasoning".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well Ms. Gray, now y'all get to preform a retro-active abortion.
Those wingers just don't get irony, at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. No, it did not. (nm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well, given Loughner's age, Roe v Wade could have helped prevent the shooting.
If only his parents had . . .

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentauros Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Right.
Because on the other side of the coin, he lives now because they made the choice to "respect the life of the unborn." And, well, we know where that led...

They just love to second-guess stuff like this, don't they? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. the sad part is just a week ago the right formed a strong backlash
to anyone who dared 'politicize' the shootings...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. oh, for gosh sakes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. What a frickin' LUNATIC!!!
I can't IMAGINE what other contorted cause 'n effect secrets she clings to! :crazy: <- Linda Gray(R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, THAT'S a stretch if I ever hear one!
And BTW, it's not an infant before it's born. It's a fetus.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. "... that the Supreme Court said we do not have to respect the life of an unborn ..." ...
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 04:56 PM by aggiesal
This is not what the Supreme Court said.

The SCOTUS decided that each of us has a right to PRIVACY under the constitution,
and that includes with your physician.
The Gov't has no right to interfere with your personal and private medical decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. On the other hand, if Mrs Loughner had had an abortion....
None of this would have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Pfft! Roe was decided 15 years before Loughner was born, and there's no reason
to think Roe set him off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Actually...
...Statistics seem to indicate the opposite. Crime fell about 2 decades after Roe was passed.

Some believe that the termination of unwanted pregnancies leads to less crime because the children who are born on balance are wanted, so they are more likely to be raised in a more nurturing environment.

Of course I am painting with a broad brush here, but that doesn't seem to bother my ideological opponents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. What the hell do unborn children have to do with the Tucson shootings?
Oh, conservatives and their loose mouths. On the other hand, reality finds that violent talk radio rhetoric may have a bigger role. And empowering women to make their OWN reproductive choices respects life far more than forcing all pregnancies to term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. WTF?????
They really do live on a different planet in a different space-time continuum don't they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. "if we can kill an infant who can't defend themselves"
THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is called staying on message.

First, her message is about Roe and it's going to permeate whatever it is she discusses. If she's very good, or her memo of talking points is very complete, she'll be able to tie traffic tickets to Roe.

Second, did you notice the "unborn" became an infant in a rather brief period of time? Yeppers. She got that cuddly, widdle, infant right in front of your face and being shot right there in Tucson in a matter of sentences.

THAT is called staying on message and message control. That's what it looks like on their side.

You have no chance, zero, of combating or correcting that punch to the lizard brain she just delivered.

Framing the message/debate. Words matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC