Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago Tribune: RTA to weigh cost, practicality of switching diesel locomotives to electric

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 08:21 PM
Original message
Chicago Tribune: RTA to weigh cost, practicality of switching diesel locomotives to electric



RTA to weigh cost, practicality of switching diesel locomotives to electric
Concern over soot, emissions prompts officials to study issue

By Richard Wronski, Tribune reporter
7:57 p.m. CST, January 18, 2011


Of Metra's 11 routes, the Electric Line is the only one whose trains are powered by electricity. But with heightened concerns over toxic locomotive fumes, some officials wonder if dumping diesel power on Metra's other lines isn't such a bad idea.

Representatives from some of the nation's largest transit agencies will meet in Chicago in March to discuss the pros and cons of electrifying more commuter rail lines here and elsewhere.

Regional Transportation Authority Executive Director Joe Costello said Tuesday that a recent Tribune investigation has focused attention on high levels of soot emitted by diesel locomotives.

No one is proposing that Metra stop running diesel, Costello said, but the RTA and the Transit Finance Learning Exchange are co-hosting a March 22 discussion of the costs and issues involved in converting to electric commuter rail lines. ........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-metra-electric-0119-20110118,0,1044994.story



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Add some water to the diesel.
Added water lets you get up to igniton pressures with a much leaner fuel mixture and leaner fuel produces far fewer particulates. Other polutant levels are alose significantly reduced.

Smaller motors and a battery or big capacitor bank for starting power could also make a huge difference.

As would a move from pistons to turbines.

Even going nuclear is an option.

Electrification does have one huge negative, a million or so tons of copper needed for the third rail/overhead catenary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC