Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Run up the score much?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:22 PM
Original message
Run up the score much?
Run up the score much?

Would you consider a 108-3 victory in a high school girls' basketball game running up the score? I say it is, no matter what the winning coach says.

No need to do a double take. That really was the score last week as Christian Heritage (Riverdale, Utah) defeated West Ridge Academy (West Jordan, Utah), a school with a motto of "We help teens with substance abuse or other difficulties."

Christian Heritage coach Rob McGill apologized but suggested slowing down or playing a bit softer would have been more insulting. "I have been on the other side of this equation," McGill told ABC 4 in Salt Lake City. "It was very insulting when teams slowed the ball down and just passed it around. That's why I'd rather have a team play me straight up, and that's why I played them straight up. Because I didn't want to taunt them, I didn't want to embarrass them, I didn't want them to think we could do whatever we want." McGill clearly believes this ideology given that some of Christian Heritage's other recent victories have been by margins of 61, 56, and 54.

Oh yeah, a score of 108-3 is not at all embarrassing. I don't know if McGill skipped the whole high school experience, but I know if my high school basketball team lost by 105 points we would have been laughingstocks (and the inspiration for many new parodies) for years to come. Honestly, this is the stuff that quitting and joining the badminton team is made of.

http://espn.go.com/espnw/blog/_/post/6054754/run-score-much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Certainly it's what I've come to expect from "Christian" institutions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. disgusting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. HOw very Christian. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. It wouldn't have been any better
if the superior team relented. when I was in HS tennis there were a few times I met up with kids from wealthy schools who had grown up playing the sport from the time they were toddlers. They invariable beat me in straight sets, but I'd have felt even worse if they had "given" me points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thank you, see my post below.
To get this concept, you would have had to play the game.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have mixed feelings on that, SS
In basketball, you can slow down the game, but I think it a somewhat condescending thing to do. Humiliation is humiliation, whether it comes from a lopsided score or a patronizing game plan.

I once coached a fearsome National Select baseball team with guys 15-18 years old. We killed everyone, with most games called due to the Skunk Rule.

There was no way I could have asked my players to run slowly, make bad throws or whiff at hamburger pitches. People would get so pissed at us but I couldn't risk injury (which is what happens when you damp down your game in baseball) to my players. It got to the point where some teams would simply forfeit as soon as the tourney schedule was announced. These were outstanding teams, too, but they knew they couldn't handle us.

That being said, I do feel sorry for those poor girls. But I will bet you that in the years to come, they will often find themselves laughing at the memories from that game.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Me, I was on the chess team, and I do recall one game our team played
I had played my first tournament in Granville, Ohio. For unrated players (not a school game). The winner got a trophy and a subscription/membership to chess life and the US chess federation. I didn't win the tournament but did pretty well. Some kid from Granville did.

Months later I ended up facing him in a school tournament (we both played second board) and I beat him so bad he looked like he was going to cry. Now in chess you can resign, but he just would not do so. I felt bad for him (while feeling good about myself) but there was no way for me to really just 'dial down' the game without it being obvious. That was almost 30 years ago and I still remember that one game more than all the others I played in high school (in professional tournaments people tend to resign, something I had done a lot of in those types of games....).

Not sure what someone is supposed to do, or how they do it in a game like basketball - you want your players to play their best, I know my coach wanted me to, but at some point you just feel bad and want it to be over and move on.

Now if we could just get the wolverines to resign before they even get on the field with the buckeyes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. The last time I played chess...
I was checkmated in four moves.

That's when I figured that chess was probably not my game.

Isn't there a term for that (King's Mate, maybe?)?

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. The term for that is
"what happens whenever I'm dumb enough to sit down at a chessboard." I'm great at all sorts of board games, but completely hopeless at chess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Four moves for white or black :) Shortest game is 2 moves white and 2 black
But yes, some have called your loss king's mate (e4, e5, bc4, bc5, qf3, nc6, qxf7 - or some variant of that).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ricochet21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Unfortunately, it's called "Fool's mate"
we learn by losing badly
but, there was to reason for them to go over 100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's it.
Did you read my reply up-post?

Winning vs Losing can all too often get to Really Winning vs Really Losing.

I am wholly competitive, maybe unhealthfully (is that a word?) so. When I was in combat, I never thought we should lighten up when we had them moving backwards. I always thought we should kill them all.

I have always thought that games were like combat, albeit with less dire results.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Close. It's called Fool's Mate (Sorry)
I've used it often. The four moves are this (I don't know chess notation so I'll just describe it).

1. Move the pawn in front of the king one or two spaces.
2. Move the Bishop on the King's side out three spaces.
3. Move the Queen out two diagonally.
4. Move the Queen across the board and take the pawn in front of the opponent King's Bishop.

If your opponent hasn't left his king an opening or done something to defend on that side, checkmate.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. What incredible insensitivity...
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 09:43 PM by catabryna
We've all heard these stories before, but now it's a girl's team. Come on ladies... don't let that coach turn you into a bunch of over-competitive boys.

Edited to add: Hey coach... lay off a little!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sports isn't about sensitivity.
And there is no reason to make girls play less hard or compete less vigorously than boys. Sports - on the competitive level - are played to win regardless of the particular combination of X and Y chromosomes on the court/field/pitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. When I was in high school...
I had a history teacher; best teacher ever. He was also a coach of a national championship high school girl's basketball team. He would have never allowed his team to compete at such a level as to demoralize another team. And, obviously, he was a great coach, in spite of his "sensitivity". His name is Brad Smith... go look him up in Sports Illustrated. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. How about a slaughter rule where at some point the game becomes a clinic?The better team teaching...
...the lesser team a little bit in the spirit of sportsmanship? Maybe even choose up new sides that are more evenly matched?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. "choose up new sides"?
Have you ever played a competitive sport? A losing team would march off the field with their battered pride before they'd pull some shit like agreeing to mix the teams up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. I agree with the coach...
It is exponentially more humiliating and degrading to have someone slow down so you can catch up...

Good lord. I understand that not everyone plays sports but everyone has to have done some sort of competition at some point in their life, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. My dad coached high school basketball
His team was competitive, often near the top of his little league in East Bumblefuck. His team had their arch rivals from another bitty town about 10 miles away. There was a team one year where all the upper-class players quit over some difference with the coach. They were left with one junior, a sophomore or two, and filled out the roster with freshmen. They were horrible.

Arch-rival played that team, and beat them by some ridiculous score, 85-15 or so, and this was in the days when a big score was 40 points or so. Dad came in to practice the next day, and of course the topic of conversation was how Arch-rival had clobbered the other school. There was a lot of big talk about doing better than Arch-rival, how they might even score a hundred, unheard-of for a high school team.

Dad listened for a few minutes, then called the team together. He said that he was making some line-up changes for Friday's game, and announced that the usual starters would be sitting out and the second-string would play. 10 mouths dropped open, but Dad had his mind made up. Even with the second string, his boys outclassed the other team, but it was at least competitive. Afterwards, the other coach came up for the post-game handshake and said, "I know what you did. Thanks." Dad pretended he didn't know what the other coach was talking about.

The horrible team hung together, and a couple of years later, with a veteran squad of varsity players, they went around the league paying everyone back. Except for one team that they still beat handily, but it wasn't the usual slaughter.

Granted, this was more than 60 years ago, and now they're probably handing out fabulous cash rewards for the best teams, enormous trophies, and heueueuege endorsement deals for the best players, so it's a totally different game nowadays, and sportsmanship is just another quaint concept for losers and those who can't keep up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. That's just one of the reasons...
I always look forward to your posts, gratuitous.

I always read 'em.

You paint great pictures and always make your point.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Why, thank you
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well, if slow ball is what you want then stick with Upwards teams...
but if it's real ball there is no slowing down for those who aren't able to keep up. When my team played a school which clearly had little talent, we never let up but typically played 2nd and 3rd string. When we played the best downtown city league they whooped our catholic asses like there was no tomorrow. None of the games was a waste, we learned a lot even while losing and I got to play against some amazing women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
24. UW Madison is known for that tactic
83-20 vs Indiana

70-3 vs Austin Peay

They should find different teams to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. That is awful.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. Even the Globetrotters allow the Washington Generals to score more than that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. Sportsmanship.
Try it sometime, Mr. McGill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC