elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:50 PM
Original message |
**Rachel discussed Keith, Said: |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 09:53 PM by elleng
No way I would have ended up with show without Keith nudging network, and for Keith to get network to make way for liberals.
Did it brilliantly.
NO EFFECT ON EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE HERE, happy to be here + you are here with us.
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. she gave him a wonderful send off |
|
but it still hurts not having him around :cry:
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Just watched -- loved it -- and waiting for Schulz? Is that tonight? |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 09:55 PM by defendandprotect
Rachel reemphasized her own show's "independence" -- certainly trust Rachel --
but not Comcast/NBC --
Trust it will all hold for a while -- !!???
Keep in mind any bit of truth is a huge risk for right wing myth/propaganda --
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I have this gnawing feeling that some on MSNBC are on borrowed time and/or will |
|
be toned down significantly from not following a strict moderate agenda.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
it has to weaken both Rachel and Schultz's shows because they don't have
Keith anymore breaking the ice for them -- and they will also have more
water to carry now. One less very important voice!
|
Poboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yes, Ed follows Rachel tonite, and regularly I think, |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-24-11 10:01 PM by elleng
but not tomorrow; different sched tomorrow w SOTU.
NOW, Ed says, 'mission stays the same. I know a lot of you are worried. Time out, nothing could be furthr from the truth.'
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. 'mission stays the same' I hope so. Just from a financial perspective I think |
|
the bean counters might tell them they would be missing a good market of viewers if they were to become a Fox-me-too.
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I'm glad he said the "mission stays the same" but |
|
I don't trust the network or comcast. Ed can't keep that promise if they don't let him.
|
socialist_n_TN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. And that's the reason they'll go to any lengths to......... |
|
silence any passionate left wing voice. Passion backed by the Truth (yes, I capitalized it on purpose) is like a stake through the heart to the capitalists.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I wonder who'll do the Keith retrospective next month. One s/b done, doncha think? nt |
jwirr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 11:49 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Larry O said basically the same thing. Ed couldn't say that as much as |
|
the other two but he also said KO would be missed. Now we will see what comes. What KO will do next and if our liberals on MSNBC are allowed to continue with their liberal viewpoint.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |