samsingh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:41 PM
Original message |
i've deleted MSNBC from my favorites |
|
i'm wondering if i should avoid watching NBC as well?
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Do what you need to do. |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Have you considered Sati? |
samsingh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Me? There's stuff on MSNBC I want to watch. I'm not that into cutting off my nose to spite my face.
|
dmr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Me neither. I like Rachel & still plan to watch her. n//t |
Uben
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I took FOX NEWS out of my programming years ago |
|
I didn't watch it, anyway, but I didn't want to give them a hit even by accident. I haven't watched MSNBC since Keith's departure, but I have not programmed them out....yet. I'm not big on political opinion shows, so I just don't watch them much. I have an opinion, and I consider it valid, so I'm not looking for anyone to sway it in any fashion. I'll get what information I need from the internet, where I deem it trustworthy.
|
Exultant Democracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I'm going to be watching Cenk at 6. |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I've yet to see any proof that Olbermann was fired and not a |
|
word from Olbermann himself saying he was fired. I'm more inclined to believe it was a mutual decision that has been in the works for some time. I'll stick to watching MSNBC.
|
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Why? Because Keith quit? |
nenagh
(657 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
10. My plan is about the reverse of your plan :) |
|
Leave a really old TV watching MSNBC from 6pm to 11pm on its own..
And on my better TV watch evening MSNBC and also channel flip..
The amoeba approach to supporting evening MSNBC..
|
louis-t
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 01:05 PM by louis-t
I watch a lot of TV Land and History Channel.
Oh, and I wrote MSNBC and Phil whats-his-name and told them why.
|
Kalyke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I won't be watching it, either. |
|
And anyone left who thinks CON-NBC isn't, as Buzzflash pointed out, slapping MSNBC away from being a progressive beachhead (hat tip: Will Pitt), then they're in denial.
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Why would Olbermann remain silent about MSNBC's move to |
Kalyke
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Firstly, he may not definitely know... |
|
The Buzzflash article is speculation based on some of CONCast's previous actions.
Secondly, even if he did, he's probably under a contractual gag order.
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. He was replaced by Cenk Uygur, that doesn't seem like a |
|
rightward move to me.
If Olbermann was fired for his political leanings, it seems hard to believe he'd agree to a contractual gag order.
|
delightfulstar
(402 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I agree, and I think he was forced out. |
|
I haven't touched M$NBC since Friday night, and have no plans to watch anytime soon.
|
May Hamm
(244 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
16. LOL And I'm SURE they noticed |
samsingh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. it's all a numbers game |
IcyPeas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
17. if they lose more and more viewers (such as yourself) |
|
maybe they will take Rachel, Ed and Lawrence off the air too....
I really don't want to lose them too.
think about it.
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They'll soon mend their ways after feeling the wrath of samsingh.
Use your power wisely, my friend.
:D
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |