This was an important--but overlooked story--in today's Chicago Tribune:
The two Appellate Court judges responsible for tossing Rahm Emanuel from the ballot in February's mayoral race both won their jobs after being anointed by a Chicago political power broker who openly supports an Emanuel opponent.
Whether or not their opinions are colored by politics, the case has recharged the debate among critics who decry a process of selecting judges that relies more heavily on political clout than merit.
Longtime Appellate Court Judges Thomas E. Hoffman and Shelvin Louise Marie Hall — who on Monday ruled that Emanuel's stay in Washington precludes him from running for mayor this year — were both judicial candidates slated for election by the Cook County Democratic Party judicial slating committee chaired by Ald. Edward Burke, 14th.
Burke, one of Chicago's most powerful politicians, holds huge sway in the election of judges at every level, including the Illinois Supreme Court, where his wife, Anne, sits as a justice and where the Emanuel ballot question is now headed for a final decision.
Burke has openly supported another candidate, Gery Chico, for mayor. A recent Tribune poll showed Chico badly trailing Emanuel.
"The real question now is whether Anne Burke must recuse herself," said Malcolm Rich, executive director of the Chicago Council of Lawyers, a group that evaluates judges and advocates reform. "Yes, there is an inherent conflict. These judges are slated by politicians. That is just the way it is.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/elections/ct-met-slated-judges-20110124,0,3891974.storySo, longtime boss Ed Burke, who has openly endorsed Gery Chico for mayor, was the one who slated both judges from the appellate court who overturned the lower court's judgement on eligibility. And his wife sits of the Supreme Court. Tricky, tricky.
You should also read the Trib's editorial today:
With startling arrogance and audaciously twisted reasoning, two appellate judges ignored more than 100 years of legal precedent, invented a new definition of "residency" and ordered Rahm Emanuel off the Feb. 22 mayoral ballot.
With the election just four weeks away, the appellate panel voted 2-1 to reverse the decisions of the Chicago Board of Elections and a Circuit Court judge. It's an adventurous, flawed ruling that has immediate and profound consequences. The case is headed to the Illinois Supreme Court, but the ballots are headed to the printer — without Emanuel's name. Early voting begins Monday.
In a blistering dissent, Appellate Justice Bertina E. Lampkin accused her colleagues, Thomas E. Hoffman and Shelvin Louise Marie Hall, of "careless disregard for the law," and harshly criticized them for refusing to ask the Supreme Court for an expedited review.
Lampkin accused the majority of ignoring case law that clearly supported Emanuel's argument —including a significant case in which Hoffman prevailed.
"The majority's new standard is ill-reasoned and unfair to the candidate, voters and those of us who are charged with applying the law," Lampkin wrote. The decision "disenfranchises not just this particular candidate but every voter in Chicago who would consider voting for him."
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-rahm-20110124,0,848590.story