G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:42 PM
Original message |
US Case Against Wikileaks’ Julian Assange Collapses |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 03:44 PM by G_j
Juan Cole has been one of the most reliable reporters on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and military matters for the past decade. This report is HUGE. www.juancole.com
US Case Against Wikileaks’ Julian Assange Collapses Posted on 01/25/2011 by Juan
The US government, according to NBC correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, now admits that it cannot tie Pfc. Bradley Manning to Wikileaks leader Julian Assange.
The military also admitted that Manning was put on suicide watch improperly twice last week by the base commander at Quantico, essentially as a form of punishment and with no consultation with psychiatrists. During the watch they took his glasses from him so he could not read.
As for Assange,
‘ The officials say that while investigators have determined that Manning had allegedly unlawfully downloaded tens of thousands of documents onto his own computer and passed them to an unauthorized person, there is apparently no evidence he passed the files directly to Assange, or had any direct contact with the controversial WikiLeaks figure. ‘
The admission appears to close off the most plausible legal strategy for the US to prosecute Assange. Since there is no Official Secrets Act in the United States, it is not clear that it is illegal to possess or to pass on classified documents. Manning himself would have broken a contractual obligation as a US government employee if he leaked classified documents, but civilians who received such documents are difficult to prosecute.
..more..
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Boy, I hope he's correct. If Bushco were in power, they'd "find" the "proof" - |
|
although I've always been puzzled why they didn't discover WMD. Guess they didn't need to go that far once we were there.
|
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I think they will still "find" proof even now if they think they need to. |
|
It doesn't matter who is in the big office. We have already seen that Obama is happy to keep far too many of Bush's worst policies, and even make them worse than they were under Bush.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Frankly I was shocked and dismayed that they went after Facebook users (or was |
|
it Twitter?). I keep expecting more fairness, at least.
|
Robb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Then Assange should have no problem with returning to Sweden, eh? |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Oh! Good point! He was fearful that he'd be extradited to the US if he did, right? nt |
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
Sonoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He can't read without his glasses? |
|
How in the world did he get into the Army?
Sonoman
|
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. wearing glasses does not |
|
exclude one from joining the military.
|
Sonoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I know that. But not being able to see without them does. |
|
Maybe they are letting borderline legally blind folks in, these days.
Hell, they're letting everyone else in.
Sonoman
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It's not just Manning they want to keep from reading. It's all of us. |
|
They've become pathetic in their attempts to keep the public from finding out what our government does.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's quite clear that passing documents is NOT illegal |
|
otherwise every journalist at the WaPo would have gone to jail
|
Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Not necessarily - he still got the documents somehow |
|
Whatever he did remains the same.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |