Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Case Against Wikileaks’ Julian Assange Collapses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 03:42 PM
Original message
US Case Against Wikileaks’ Julian Assange Collapses
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 03:44 PM by G_j
Juan Cole has been one of the most reliable reporters on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and military matters for the past decade. This report is HUGE.

www.juancole.com


US Case Against Wikileaks’ Julian Assange Collapses
Posted on 01/25/2011 by Juan

The US government, according to NBC correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, now admits that it cannot tie Pfc. Bradley Manning to Wikileaks leader Julian Assange.

The military also admitted that Manning was put on suicide watch improperly twice last week by the base commander at Quantico, essentially as a form of punishment and with no consultation with psychiatrists. During the watch they took his glasses from him so he could not read.

As for Assange,

‘ The officials say that while investigators have determined that Manning had allegedly unlawfully downloaded tens of thousands of documents onto his own computer and passed them to an unauthorized person, there is apparently no evidence he passed the files directly to Assange, or had any direct contact with the controversial WikiLeaks figure. ‘

The admission appears to close off the most plausible legal strategy for the US to prosecute Assange. Since there is no Official Secrets Act in the United States, it is not clear that it is illegal to possess or to pass on classified documents. Manning himself would have broken a contractual obligation as a US government employee if he leaked classified documents, but civilians who received such documents are difficult to prosecute.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy, I hope he's correct. If Bushco were in power, they'd "find" the "proof" -
although I've always been puzzled why they didn't discover WMD. Guess they didn't need to go that far once we were there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think they will still "find" proof even now if they think they need to.
It doesn't matter who is in the big office. We have already seen that Obama is happy to keep far too many of Bush's worst policies, and even make them worse than they were under Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Frankly I was shocked and dismayed that they went after Facebook users (or was
it Twitter?). I keep expecting more fairness, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Then Assange should have no problem with returning to Sweden, eh?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Oh! Good point! He was fearful that he'd be extradited to the US if he did, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. He can't read without his glasses?
How in the world did he get into the Army?

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. wearing glasses does not
exclude one from joining the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know that. But not being able to see without them does.
Maybe they are letting borderline legally blind folks in, these days.

Hell, they're letting everyone else in.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's not just Manning they want to keep from reading. It's all of us.
They've become pathetic in their attempts to keep the public from finding out what our government does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's quite clear that passing documents is NOT illegal
otherwise every journalist at the WaPo would have gone to jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not necessarily - he still got the documents somehow
Whatever he did remains the same.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC