boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:41 PM
Original message |
Is the Tea Party getting prime time time to give a mini SOTU?? |
|
please tell me that is not the case.....
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. what the hell is bachman doing?? |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Attention whoring would be my guess. nt |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. why is she getting so much attention if she isn't gonna be on after the prez? |
blaze
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That's my understanding. Michelle Blech!! nt |
RagAss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. what is it bachman is doing? do you know? nt |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. I think she's going to giver HER/Tea Party response to the SOTU, and I believe |
|
it's an online thing.
She's really pissing off the Republicans. I hope she is, anyway. Another loose cannon.
|
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. I know it's hard to get a straight answer sometimes. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 07:07 PM by gateley
:7
ETA: But attention whoring is accurate, too!
|
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
on NPR about 3 hours ago, CNN would be covering her response.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Is she too whack for even Fox? nt |
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. I'm sure they will cover her as well, but I refuse to even check |
|
to see if they will. Found this though: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/bachmanns-speech-will-push-tea-party-goals/?partner=rss&emc=rssOnly CNN has said will carry the congresswoman’s remarks live and in their entirety; however, the Tea Party Express plans to live-stream her speech on its Web site.
|
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
23. I wouldn't click on CNN tonight if it was the only station broadcasting. |
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
24. It will be interesting to hear how much of an audience she gets, although |
|
some may just tune in to watch the train wreck.
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
8. If the Tea Party were to get it (I don't think so), then all political parties in the US should have |
|
air time too - let's see, that could go on a few days!
|
Kennah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Obama isn't quite ready to start quoting Lincoln ... |
|
... but I think Bachmann will be channeling Jefferson Davis.
|
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
13. CNN will be covering the tea nut. nt |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. Maybe they feel a need to fill the Palin void? |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. good point, Palins hasn't tweeted for 2 days..... |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. that just isn't right. will she be "armed and dangerous"? |
obxhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-25-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Carrying a firearm? Possibly |
|
Dangerous? Yes, but that will mostly only be inflicted on her constituents at a future date.
Armed with insulting rhetoric, false "facts", and outright lies? You betcha!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message |