Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your gut feeling... when do you think social security will run out of money?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:42 AM
Original message
Poll question: Your gut feeling... when do you think social security will run out of money?
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 02:45 AM by Luminous Animal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. uh - never. and it's not projected to "run out of money", either. not sure what the point
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 02:46 AM by Hannah Bell
of this poll is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Added never as an option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I would have voted 'never' if I had seen it. Oh well, voted too quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. me too did not see the "never"
they want you to think it will run out, such BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. This is why.
Calvin Woodward's "fact" check.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110126/ap_on_re_us/us_state_of_union_fact_check

OBAMA: "To put us on solid ground, we should also find a bipartisan solution to strengthen Social Security for future generations."

THE FACTS: With that comment, Obama missed another chance to embrace the tough medicine proposed by the commission for bringing down the deficit. For example, he ruled out slashing benefits or partially privatizing the program, and made no reference to raising the retirement age. That left listeners to guess how he plans to do anything to salvage the popular retirement program whose trust funds are expected to run out of money in 2037 without changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I want to emphasize that this is a Yahoo News "fact" checker who claims that
SS funds will run out of money in 2037.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. The "Trust Fund" isn't Social Security. The title of your OP is misleading.
As is the "fact check," as SS wasn't set up to have a massive Trust Fund that "saved" SS money for the future. That was reagan-Greenspan creation.

SS was set up pay-go. In 2037 the oldest boomers will be 92 & the youngest 76, & most will be dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I never said trust fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. my point entirely. you asked when SS will run out of money, then presented the yahoo fact checker
who said the TF will run out of money.

The TF isn't "Social Security," & SS wasn't set up as a savings plan.

I still don't understand what the point of the OP is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Actually, no. I presented the Yahoo fact checker later. Not in my OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Never
the claim that it will run out is just a myth being perpetuated by those who want to get their hands on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. For those who voted between 2030-2049, I'd like to know why you believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody wants who believes that SS will be out of money by 2037 wants to defend their position?
Facts, links, quotes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Here's a quote from my "Social Security Statement" ...
About Social Security's future...
Social Security is a compact between generations. Since 1935, America has kept the promise of security for its workers and their families. Now, however, the Social Security system is facing serious financial problems, and action is needed soon to make sure the system will be sound when today's younger workers are ready for retirement.
In 2016 we will begin paying more in benefits than we collect in taxes. Without changes, by 2037 the Social Security Trust Fund will be exhausted and there will be enough money to pay only about 76 cents for each dollar of scheduled benefits. We need to resolve these issues soon to make sure Social Security continues to provide a foundation of protection for future generations.

Vist www.socialsecurity.gov to learn more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
13. The problem with SS money is in high unemployment times like we are facing today
it means SS takes in less money then it gives out, of course congress using SS money to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy also plays into the shortage. But reality is the folks who claim SS will be broke by 2037 are using some screwed up factors to make that claim, the number of people who will be collecting SS in 2037 and using todays unemployed numbers. The problem I have with this is it is nothing more then fortune telling. The one thing about the future is there is no way to predict 2037 and what the country will be facing in the future based on information thats available today. If nothing changes between now and 2037 SS will be broke. That is what they are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Have you looked at the SSA web page? Does the government claim that SS will be broke?
And what do you mean by broke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I said the folks who predict that SS will be broke by 2037
That is fortune telling with nothing to base it on except whats going on at this moment in time. 2037 is a future event there is no way to know what is going to happen. It reminds me of my grand father who declared man would never step foot on the moon in 1967, he passed away 1 week before the moon landing in 1969. He based his prediction on what humans could do in 1967. That is what the SS dooms day folks are doing with SS and 2037.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. SS has been solvent for 75 years based on predictions. Wall Street has been solvent...
Do you have any basis in fact to show that SS will run out of money in 2037?

And I mean totally run out of money as opposed to facing a shortfall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Where did I say SS was running out of money? What I said was that the folks who make this claim
base their predictions on faulty figures, like using todays unemployed numbers to show that in 2037 SS will run out of money because the same number of workers will be unemployed in 2037 as today. As well as the number of people who are or about to be on SS, but they ignore death rates of workers instead they use the longer life expectation that benefits the rich and not the people who will be on SS to try to say that the same number of people will be on SS in 2037. In the past predictions counted in unknown factors which lowered the figures, the dooms dayers want high numbers that show SS will run out of money to push their agenda, which is either killing SS or putting SS in the hands of the private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is this a kind of "when did you stop beating your wife?" question?
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 03:14 AM by Puzzler
(in other words, it's framed from the question itself)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Nope it is more like I can tell you exactly every event that will happen to me
tomorrow and all the out comes of said events tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Que?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dammit, I goofed. Should have voted "never". The way that it's set up & providing
the government keeps the system intact & disciples itself from borrowing from it, SS should never run out of money.

If there's ever any shortage of SS funds, it's strictly the politicians' fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. the moment I become eligible to collect
I'll get an empty paper bag and a nasty look from the clerk behind the desk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. As soon as we have a large enough majority Rethuglican Congress
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 01:58 PM by Urban Prairie
And a Rethug again is occupying the Oval Office. SS has long been the proverbial socialist thorn in their conservative sides.

Rightwingers will continue to attempt to propagate the perception that it ultimately will run out of funds, and then after "successfully" doing so, create, introduce, and attempt to pass legislation to change contributions to SS to being entirely voluntary, remove its tax-exempt status, and eliminate mandatory FICA deductions/payments from earned/declared income, and last, but certainly not least, privatize payouts and contributions, by linking it instead to the stock market, investments in real estate/property and/or precious metals/gems...ect.

They whole idea behind conservatives' fervent desire for a "smaller government" that is shrunk down to a size that can be "drowned in a bathtub" is not necessarily to reduce if not completely eliminate the "federal debt", but in actuality the rightwing's true intent is to greatly reduce, if not better still, completely rid the US of liberal/progressive/leftist/Democratic influence in legislation and representation in government at ALL levels. To accomplish this goal, everything with the exception of the three branches of government and the military will need to become entirely privatized, and all social services that the government provides and funds is completely eliminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. This.
Soon as TPTB get their filthy hands on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. One day before I become eligible. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
28. The day before I become eligible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. You couldn't burn that pile of iou's in a lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. The day Democrats sneak up behind it and cut its throat
to the applause of Republicans and their corporate sponsors.

When exactly? I don't know. Keep the Ides of March open on your calendar if you want to be prepared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC