Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did NBC just report Social Security has a 45 billion dollar deficit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:52 PM
Original message
Why did NBC just report Social Security has a 45 billion dollar deficit.
Do they just make stuff up now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. They've been making up stuff all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. the BIG lie
Despite the chattering of the elites who are desperate to pay for their tax cuts on the backs of the elderly and the disabled, SS has nothing to do with the deficit and has over TWO TRILLION DOLLARS in their account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because they are full of shit. Who presented that "fact"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. scare people
into thinking SS is in it's death throes and we should all "invest" in 401K and the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. That means that current outgo is more than current income. It draws from the surplus.
That's why we built up the surplus, so that we couldn't have to increase Social Security taxes or cut Social Security benefits when we Baby Boomers retired.

It's working just like it's supposed to.

Of course, they could've reported that Social Security has begun drawing on its enormous surplus. But then they'd have to explain that it has a $2.6 trillion surplus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And using that logic, my IRA is now running a deficit since I'm beginning to withdraw
from the money I saved for my retirmeent.

Silly me. I thought it was supposed to work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. except current outgo *isn't" more than income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. The CBO has put out some data that doesn't really mean what NBC and others say it means.
This is understandable due to the economic conditions and can be readily fixed. Those who know more about this will make it clear, I'm sure. I saw this on Yahoo and it is negatively spun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. So their corporate paymasters can move forward with their agenda
of killing off the middle class? Just my 2cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. That left wing media at it again :) .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. The wealthy owners at GE
want to get their hands on the SS trust fund because it's one of the only places Americans have any money left.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think they are talking about current receipts vs, current outlays....
It's because we are at least at 9.4% employment and all those people that are on Social Security is increasing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. gee, you mean our leaders got their fingers in the lockbox?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Now? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because it's time to stop warrin' and pony up for the "lockbox", muthafukkahs!!1!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. NBC = 'Nother Bullshit Corporation nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a real shitty way of saying that SS will take in $45billion less this year,
because of the payroll tax deduction.

Teh stupid never stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Less people getting paychecks means less people paying FICA
sounds like a no-brainer to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Has that payroll tax holiday started cause I can't tell.
maybe employers have adjusted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. That report ignores the interest on trillion dollar + surplus built up over the years
Focusing just on the current year projected deficit not only ignores the huge surplus but the interest due this year on the trillion plus trust fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Do you have an authoritative source on that?
I also noticed they only say that payroll taxes won't keep up, but the conclusion makes it sound like interest is taken into account. I wouldn't be surprised if the people who write these articles aren't aware of the difference, so it's kind of ambiguous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. You're right.
I posted a new thread about this. Journalistic malpractice of the first order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. What the articles say is that
starting this year, payroll taxes will not be enough to pay for SS benefits. This wasn't supposed to happen until 2016. This is independent of the payroll tax holiday.

As with much reporting these days, it is ambiguous--SS currently takes in not just payroll taxes, but also interest on the trust fund. I'm guessing that the interest is taken into account too, though none of the articles I've read mention that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCheese Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Correcting myself.
It looks like that interest is NOT taken into account, which is of course silly. I'll post on that downthread. Sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. I figured it out.
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 07:54 PM by Skink
I took a loan against my 401k. I am now paying it back with interest. I got like 2 months before starting to pay it back. Our politicians keep taking loans from social security but haven't started paying them back cause they think they won't have to.


Uh Uh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. We know its a lie!!!!!
Edited on Wed Jan-26-11 08:04 PM by mstinamotorcity
But there are those who believe it to be true. We must make sure that we always say the truth. Social Security is fine!!!!Social Security has a 2.6 Trillion dollar trust. They see the money sitting there and Wall Street wants a part of it. They want to get there Grubby little hands on your Social Security. Social Security Can pay out a 100% until 2037 and adjust to 75% after that. Given that the economy stays at its current rate . But if more people work the more people who pay into Social Security which will prolong its life. One reason for holding out on the jobs to force the issue. So Wall Street can get paid off taxpayers AGAIN (TARP).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC