Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Haven't we just allowed ourselves to get "framed" out of the game?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Atticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 12:07 AM
Original message
Haven't we just allowed ourselves to get "framed" out of the game?
Throw out the rules. They have been constructed by people who favor only the preservation of the current power structure.

If you are spending more than you are taking in, there are---contrary to how the nation is now behaving---three different approaches to balancing your budget.

You could cut your expenditures and simply make do with what you now earn.

You could increase your income and maintain your expenditures.

You could do some of both: trim some expenses and find a way to increse you income just enough to pay for the remaining expenses.

No one in their right mind would suggest that you reduce your income and then compensate for the shortfall by drastically slashing your spending. But, isn't this what we as a nation have just done?

Why should we accept the tax cuts for the wealthy as a given? Why increase the burden for 98% of us so that the top 2% can pocket a few hundred thousand a year more?

This is wrong. To accept it meekly and without protest is immoral.

And, though I do know how this will be received by many, until we are ready to shut down the government with a general strike---block highways, obstruct building entrances and fill the streets around centers of government and the corporate headquarters where our laws are being written, we are likely wasting our time with the pretense of democracy as we now practice it.

As Father Berrigan said, "If voting could change things, it would be illegal."

If our course is not corrected, the next few years will feature automobiles we cannot afford to operate, food that is ever more scarce and expensive and government encouragement of madmen willing to select "others" to blame for our decline. All that is necessary for this future to be made manifest is for us to continue to stay in line, wait our turn and do as we're told by the soulless businessmen who claim to have a bill of sale for our nation.

We'd better find a way to take care of ourselves because I don't think Exxon-Mobil or General Electric is at all interested in the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. to refuse to veto tax cuts for wealthy & then claim they are bad is a tad hypocritical IMO nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R

"No one in their right mind would suggest that you reduce your income and then compensate for the shortfall by drastically slashing your spending. But, isn't this what we as a nation have just done?


Yep...I would say we have. Unfortunately, many families have HAD to do this. But, it's different with the government.....which has with Congressional approval reduce the nation's income by continuing with the ridiculous tax cuts to the rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. I regret to inform both you and myself, that I agree completely
And I do regret it; I hope that you're wrong that it would require mass civil disobedience to stop these greedy mofos, but....I don't think you are. (and I also have very serious doubts enough people will snap out of their state of hypnosis to do anything )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Generic Other Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. we should at least insist
that until the tax cuts for the rich expire that none of the rest of us should have to tighten our belts either.
no, zero, programs what-so-ever (especially social security or medicare) should suffer one cent of reduction in funding.
when the legislature wants to get serious about cutting spending they can start with those who have some money to spare. the rich need to be taxed, the defense budget cut, and crooked bankers and politicians need to go to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. +1,000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. There's no law that says that we each individually couldn't take a very leisurely
drive around Capital Hill-and every major corporation's headquarters-at 5am on the exact same day. Several million of us, just taking in the sights, all at the same places and time, for seven or eight or ten hours.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. I tried to protest before the compromise was made
was sort of met with a collective yawn. Maybe people will wake up when cuts are made to social security or the Government is shut down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC