Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

25 Years of Digital Vandalism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 08:02 AM
Original message
25 Years of Digital Vandalism
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/27/opinion/27Gibson.html?src=fbmain

IN January 1986, Basit and Amjad Alvi, sibling programmers living near the main train station in Lahore, Pakistan, wrote a piece of code to safeguard the latest version of their heart-monitoring software from piracy. They called it Brain, and it was basically a wheel-clamp for PCs. Computers that ran their program, plus this new bit of code, would stop working after a year, though they cheerfully provided three telephone numbers, against the day. If you were a legitimate user, and could prove it, they’d unlock you.



the author has carefully thought about this -- and brings it right up to date with stuxnet.
and the possible/probable outcome of this new age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Such code was around long before 1986
It certainly became more widespread after the IBM PC and MS-DOS, but it predates each of those products.

The most common early "safeguards" were in things like telephone switches and military communications systems which were made with secret cutoff switches or other compromises that could be activated by, for example US or UK, manufacturers in the event of a conflict involving foreign buyers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
localroger Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The difference is that the new code was a virus
It didn't just protect the writer's own program, it spread itself through other software and from computer to computer all on its own as well. That wasn't really practical until enough computers were all running intercompatible software; before the PC and DOS, programs written for one computer usually wouldn't run on another, even the next model created by the same company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC