|
Although without doing the research, it's possible they got it from Europe. After the fall of Rome, the Europeans obsessed about what we now call ancient Greece. They studied Plato because of his connection to Paul and thus to Christian theology (which is probably more Plato than Jesus in some ways). They had, however, lost the works of Aristotle until the twelfth century or so, when he was re-introduced (they knew who he was, they had just lost his writings) through Arabic. I don't know the history of that word, but obviously its origins were in Athens, and both Europe and Arabic culture valued Athenian learning, so they may have both picked it up from ancient Athenian texts, or Europe could have picked it up along with science, math, and love songs, from the Muslims in Spain and Sicily, or it's possible that the Muslims picked it up later from the Europeans.
A weird parallel is zero. Rome, and thus Europe, had no concept of the zero, as you can tell by there being a 1 AD and a 1 BC, but no zero point between them. The Arabs also had no zero--they picked it up when they conquered India, who came up with it on their own or through contact with China (I'm not sure). But Arabic culture never really picked up the zero beyond their scholars and academics. When the European scholars began learning from the far superior Muslim scholars, they did learn about the zero, and its use spread quickly from academics to the populace, especially for use in trade and business. Through trade, it then began spreading from the Europeans back to the Muslim traders, and thus into common knowledge in Arabic culture, where they thought the zero was a European acquisition.
No idea how "democracy" and "dictator" spread. I'm sure it's been researched. I just dictionaried "dictator" and it has Latin origins, so they probably did learn the term from the West.
One more tidbit, just to demonstrate the complete superiority of Arabic/Persian/Muslim culture to Europe in the Middle Ages. Gerbert of Aurillac (later Pope Sylvester II) studied mathematics in northern Spain, in monasteries near the border with Muslim Spain. When he became Pope right around the first millenium, his mathematical skills and scientific knowledge were so far advanced beyond his fellow Christians that he was considered to be a wizard, and some thought he had dealings with the devil. He seems to have been able to work with Arabic numerals and zeros and the abacus (all concepts we got from Muslims), and this was incomprehensible to everyone else. A hundred years later Arabic/Muslim learning had become so commonplace that there was a backlash against it, as the Church and many Christian scholars fought the intrusion of concepts like logic and philosophy and theology into their concept of learning, which was based more on revealed texts than human reasoning. That's a little over-dramatized--a lot of Christian scholars at the time welcomed logic and used it extensively. But Muslim thought had created a revolution in European thought, and a lot of concepts we think of as Western--everything from Gothic architecture to love poetry and our whole concept of Romantic love--were heavily influenced or outright borrowed from Muslim/Arabic sources.
Oddly, we in the West commonly acknowledged this as recently as a hundred years ago, but sometime around the age of Darwin there was a Christian backlash that tried to forget all Muslim debt.
|