Probe: Army was warned not to deploy WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning

[Amerigo Vespucci]

Posted on Thursday, 01.27.11

Probe: Army was warned not to deploy WikiLeaks suspect

By NANCY A. YOUSSEF
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON -- Investigators have concluded that Army commanders ignored advice not to send to Iraq an Army private who is now accused of downloading hundreds of thousands of sensitive reports and diplomatic cables that ended up on the WikiLeaks website in the largest single security breach in American history, McClatchy Newspapers has learned.

Pfc. Bradley Manning's direct supervisor warned that Manning had thrown chairs at colleagues and shouted at higher-ranking soldiers in the year he was stationed at Fort Drum, N.Y., and advised that Manning shouldn't be sent to Iraq, where his job would entail accessing classified documents through the Defense Department's computer system.

But superior officers decided to ignore the advice because the unit was short of intelligence analysts and needed Manning's skills, two military officials familiar with the investigation told McClatchy Newspapers.

The commanders hoped they could address Manning's discipline problems in Iraq, the officials told McClatchy Newspapers, but then never properly monitored him. The result was a "comedy of errors" as one commander after another assumed someone else was addressing Manning's problems, one official said. Both officials spoke anonymously because they weren't authorized to discuss the investigation.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/01/27/2037978/probe-army-was-warned-not-to-deploy.html#ixzz1CI8GLciv

[ananda]

1. hmm

Doesn't this sound a bit convenient revisionism since there is no one
to rebut it?

[EFerrari]

2. A bit. To my too cynical mind, it sounds as if someone "normal"

wouldn't have objected to processing prisoners out into the hands of Iraqi torturers but, that's me for ya.

[DCKit]

3. +1 Now I'm wondering if Manning is simply a convenient patsy. nt

[elias49]

4. Oh snap! nt