Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama Misses the Point in Egypt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:29 PM
Original message
President Obama Misses the Point in Egypt
Edited on Fri Jan-28-11 11:44 PM by Better Believe It
Obama Misses the Point in Egypt
By: Siun
January 28, 2011

Once again, the Obama administration is unable to catch up with events in Egypt and unwilling to take a strong stand on behalf of the people who call for democracy and human rights. From Vice President Biden’s comment last night that Mubarak is not a dictator, Sec. Clinton’s weak words of “concern” and now President Obama’s statement which, while claiming to understand the “grievances” of the Egyptian people, relies still on Mubarak to bring about change and grants Mubarak a legitimacy clearly lost in the streets of Egypt today.

American officials continuing to look to Mubarak for “reform,” ignoring as we have for so many years the brutality of his regime will likely be as meaningless to the Egyptians as Mubarak’s own speech was.

Mubarak’s horrific treatment of the Egyptian people over the years is no surprise to US administrations – after all we’ve been providing him with the weapons and backing to keep it up.

Tomorrow there will be demonstrations in support of the Egyptian people around the world.

http://firedoglake.com/2011/01/28/obama-misses-the-point-in-egypt/


-------------------------------------------

U.S. Aid to Egypt: The Current Situation and Future Prospects
Ahmad Al-Sayed El-Naggar
Ahmad El-Naggar is editor-in-chief of the Economic Strategy Trends Report published by the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies.
June 2009

A question is always raised in conversations with USAID officials: Why don’t Egyptians notice the role of American aid to their country? The simple answer is that U.S. economic aid to Egypt, which amounted to $455 million in 2007, translated to only $6 per capita,<1> compared to $40.8 per capita in Jordan for the same year. Yet Jordan’s per capita income, $2,850 in 2007, is 170 percent that of Egypt.

With U.S. economic aid to Egypt cut to $200 million for 2009, the per capita share is a measly $2.60 in a country with an average gross domestic income (GDP) per capita at current prices of about $1,697 in 2007 and $2,184 in 2008 according to the World Development Report of 2009—the sharp increase is partially attributed to the high inflation rate of 11.8 percent in 2008. If calculated using Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) that adjusts for the relative purchasing power difference between the Egyptian pound and the dollar, the average per capita income in Egypt was $5,352 in 2007 and $5,400 in 2008. Therefore, in per capita terms, U.S. economic aid to Egypt is barely a drop in the bucket.

The current focus on helping businessmen, particularly powerful ones, and on U.S.-chosen infrastructure projects that create few permanent job opportunities will keep USAID unpopular in Egypt, especially in light of the aid’s small size.

As for U.S. security and military aid to Egypt, which is about $1.3 billion annually, it does not aim to strengthen Egyptian military power against any external threat, as this would be contrary to the declared U.S. objective of ensuring Israeli security and maintaining Israeli military supremacy over its Arab neighbors, including Egypt. Instead, this aid is devoted mainly to strengthening the regime’s domestic security and its ability to confront popular movements.

Read the full article at:

http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=23282

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Disagree. Obama gets the point very well. He's in a bind, IMO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Agree with you
The U.S. backs its allies, but maintains contact--even supportive ties--with opposition movements as well.

Our government doesn't want to be seen as casually throwing our allies under the bus, supposedly for fear of engendering distrust and suspicion among other allies (even though everyone knows how quickly allegiances can turn when perceptions of what is in our national interest change).

Wikileaks revealed U.S. supportive ties with the opposition in Egypt. While that's still a far cry from supporting revolution, the U.S. has turned against allies in the past--Ngô Đình Diệm in Vietnam, Noriega in Panama, Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Our "official" position can be a poor indicator of of what is actually going on in our complex international relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Very well said. And I just saw a post bout our ties with the opposition! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Good links

Thanks for posting these
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-28-11 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. ty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. The same principle from the Iranian protests obtains. Any American influence is poisonous.
America is perceptibly inseparable from Israel. Hands off quiet diplomacy is the only option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep, but FDL will never understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC