Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oklahoma Board of Education Member Says Pregnant Hire Could Be "Worthless"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:42 PM
Original message
Oklahoma Board of Education Member Says Pregnant Hire Could Be "Worthless"
The Associated Press reports that an Oklahoma Board of Education official is under fire after questioning the hiring of a pregnant woman. Upon hearing that the school board opted to hire Jessica Russell, who is set to give birth in April, former State Senator Herb Rozell remarked “If she has that baby in April and takes off six weeks, she's worthless to us. She won’t be able to keep up.” The remark, made in front of the Board of Education and Ms. Russell, garnered some awkward laughter. Superintendent Janet Barresi quickly ordered a 10 minute recess and told Mr. Rozell “Your comment is inappropriate and not worthy of this board and this department.” Ms. Russell left the room in tears.

After the meeting Mr. Rozell claimed, “I didn't mean to interfere. I was just hoping we could have her in April and May, because that's when everything gets tied up.” Ms. Russell is to represent the Department of Education at the Capitol. According to the Associated Press “The Oklahoma Legislature reconvenes Feb. 7 and must end its business by May 27.” Ms. Russell was shocked by the comment and said she “felt humiliated and insulted. couldn't believe something like that would be said at a public meeting.” Mr. Rozell’s remark has caused numerous people to call for his resignation, including Senator Clark Jolley and Senator John Ford. Mr. Rozell has publicly stated that he would like to apologize to Ms. Russell in person, which she says is a “possibility.”

http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/okla-boe-member-questions-if-pregnant-owman/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was an assholish comment
but I don't think he should resign. I believe everyone gets one assholery mulligan at their job.

Assuming this isn't a pattern, make him apologize and make sure he keeps his trap shut for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The problem is most people like this filter out their worst thoughts and say what they think
they can get away with. So, if this is what he thinks others will accept, what is he filtering out and not saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If he is in fact a "person like this". Unguarded uttering of the end result...
...of a freewheeling train of thought is NOT an uncommon faux pas.

Assuming he was playing with numbers on his "blotter", he might have found himself figuring the cost to the district, and when someone mentioned her due date he lifted his head and said: "Yes and this means...." <insert foot in mouth here>

Anyone can say stupid and insensitive things when they are distracted. Was he? I have no idea. But he could have been.

If it IS part of a pattern of behaviour then certainly more serious sanctions should be in order. If not, a public censuring and appology is appropriate and sufficient.

Listen for the diference between "I'm sorry if you found offense in my words.", and "I'm sorry if my words caused offense."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. So you think it's OK to have female teachers suffer under this misogynist ASSHOLE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. My grad school advisor tells a story about the birth of her child -- her esteemed colleagues wanted
to know when she'd be back to work. Would it be one day or two?

That's the America the Teabaggers want back....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Most men think pregnancy and childbirth are a fucking picnic.
Just a walk in the park.
They don't realize that pregnancy and delivery can be life threatening. They are often disabling.

When I was pregnant, I had to stop working at 24 weeks. I was so big I could not sit up without the baby's pressure on my ribs killing me. So I laid around the house trying to eat and sleep and breathe. Yet my jerkwad husband said that I got big because I was "lazy and didn't exercise". He thought he was an expert on women and childbirth. I could barely walk by the time I delivered.

after delivery it took me two months before I went back to work. So I basically lost six months due to disability from pregnancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. My now ex-husband wanted me to get pregnant a 2nd time in college
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 01:10 AM by rainbow4321
We had been married a few months when I found out that I was pregnant with our first (unexpected) baby...fortunately, I made it thru the two semesters and had the baby a week after school let out. Whew, did I cut that close!

My last year in nursing school and he tried to convince me to get pregnant a second time. Never mind that I was in clinicals (aka free labor) for 24 hours a week and class time the rest of the week, getting up at 4 am to go study at Denny's, and if I was lucky, getting to spend an hour or two a day with our then-2 yr old....I had a WTF moment the night he asked me. Took me a while to get that thru his head, he pouted a while over my refusal.
But it was then that I knew he had no clue what I had gone thru or the mental and physical exhaustion I had been thru being pregnant the first time while taking classes/studying and then having a newborn when classes resumed that Fall semester. Not a damn clue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's a tough call.
It sounds easy: You can't discriminate.

On the other hand, if she does take off 6 weeks and the real crunch time for her job is during those 6 weeks, they really should have hired another person. Her replacement will have a hell of a time coming up to speed on representing the OK education department's needs and wants to the legislators and may not have any personal rapport with any legislators.

It's like hiring a salesperson who'll specialize in holiday catering, only to find out that she'll be off from a few days before Thanksgiving until just after New Year's. Maybe it's a good hire and maybe things will work out nicely next year. But this year, you're screwed.

Which is precisely why some accommodations are required by law and some aren't.

Still, it shouldn't have been said in public. Public is never the right place for discussing personnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. You're ignorant of the law and if offered you should recuse yourself from such decisions
Title VII's pregnancy-related protections include:

* Hiring

An employer cannot refuse to hire a pregnant woman because of her pregnancy, because of a pregnancy-related condition, or because of the prejudices of co-workers, clients, or customers.

http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-preg.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ehrnst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. But anyone could have gotten ill at that time, or their spouse could die.
If that had happened, and the employee took time off, would they say that they hired the wrong person?

This woman is giving them time to deal with the issue, and find someone.

Screwing over women, and making it easier for employers to say, "if we hire a woman, she could get pregnant, and we'll be screwed" is the type of putting "bottom line" over every other consideration is part of the decay of this country.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Foo Fighter Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. So, what if instead of hiring a pregnant woman, they had hired a father-to-be?
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 03:15 AM by Foo Fighter
Would that be any different? After all, the woman only get two weeks medical leave, same as the guy, so what's the diff?

I have never held a job where the woman gets 6 weeks medical leave after having a baby. Two weeks is the norm for the woman and for some reason, the father gets those same two weeks. Sure, those "two weeks" for the father are meant for them helping out the new mom but every single new dad I have known has used them to drop off the wife and newborn at home and immediatly leave on a two-week hunting or fishing junket. I have yet to see one single father use those two weeks as intended.

That said, I disagree the that woman should only be allowed 2 weeks off. Medical experts say it takes 6 weeks to recover from childbirth and I'd put my stock in their word over that of those that are interested solely in corporate profits any day of the week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems2002 Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Are you serious?
Wow. I'm a woman in my 30s without kids, but ALL of my friends' husbands help with the kids. They've all taken family leave to be home with the kids, not to go out of town. I cannot imagine any of my girlfriends putting up with that crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Then you don't know many fathers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherish44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. What an insensitve thing to say
I'm sure that's how he feels. There are a lot of people who look at employees as pieces of meat not human beings. and the $$ bottom line is almighty to them....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
15. there's more to this story...
http://www.newsok.com/gun-threat-made-by-telephone-to-janet-barresis-office/article/3536221
apparently, the day after idiot Rozell's comments were broadcast, someone called the Superintendent's office and said the problem should be handled with a gun.

there's much turmoil regarding Ms. Barresi and her administration. She's tried to get her campaign manager a nice cushy job, despite the fact that the person in question doesn't have the qualifications to hold such a position. that's the last thing Oklahoma needs, more political cronies screwing around with education.

(note: none of this means that I support Rozell's disgusting comments. i'm just pointing out the hostility that has emerged in the last few days).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. State school boards
This Kansan sends you sympathy. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I have to say...
I'm happy I don't have kids yet. I don't have to deal with things like this on too-personal a level at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. That's not very fetus-friendly of him
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC