Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sheriff bans officers from having tattoos and gold teeth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 02:37 PM
Original message
Sheriff bans officers from having tattoos and gold teeth
Sheriff bans officers from having tattoos and gold teeth

Officers at a Florida police force have been told that they are not permitted to have visible tattoos or gold teeth.

The new policy at Broward Sheriff's Office also forbids piercings and 'body mutilation'.

It is believed that deputies at the Fort Lauderdale force with a gold-toothed grin will now have to pay to have the expensive dentistry removed if they are to keep their job.

Gold or platinum veneers for decorative reasons are strictly not allowed under the new rules, but officers who can prove they have caps or fillings for dental purposes will be permitted to keep them.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1351423/Sheriff-bans-officers-having-tattoos-gold-teeth.html#ixzz1CY6hhtzY

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I had a dream of becoming a wealthy agent for a up and coming music
sensation, my idea was to outfit him with a blue sapphire veneer on one of his incisors, and quite naturally his stage name would be "Bluetooth". Ahhh if only we pursued our dreams as we should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There has already been a "bluetooth" in history who made it big...
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 03:05 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is very hard to make it retroactive under the circumstances
Existing ones will be grandfathered, new ones not permitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is it okay to have diamonds in your teeth??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. You can bet this is gonna go over real good with the force
yep, instead of worrying about how clean the guns are, they're gonna be wearing long sleeves in July/August/September, you know, the coolest months of the year in sweaty Floriduh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Cops in Arizona have to wear long sleeves year round
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 03:28 PM by Confusious
In 120F. How do I know this? I asked a cop if it sucked after he gave me a speeding ticket. In July. He was going to go find shade afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Where was that? Phoenix, tucson, Maricopa County and Pima County all allow short sleeves.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 04:30 PM by blondeatlast
Edit: Pinal county as well--all of these I'm certain of.

BTW, I've lived in Arizona for 38 years; never seen a long sleeved cop in the summer except at a funeral in full dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Maybe it was the state police.
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Tucson motorcycle cop.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 05:32 PM by Confusious
I see them in long sleeves all the time, summer and winter. Of course, I speed all the time, so I look out for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So? I have to wear long sleeves in the same place - and it's heavy FR material as well.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 03:55 PM by Edweird
FR = fire retardant
Plus I get to use the thickest rubber gloves you've ever seen and they are tucked inside leather gloves.

They, at least, have air conditioned squad cars, while I am out in the sun (and rain) the whole day.

If they want to be professional law enforcement, it shouldn't be too much to ask that they maintain appearance standards appropriate for the position. I can't have body piercings at my job - I used to have quite a few all over the place. I'm also not allowed to wear jewelry. Such is life.



That's downtown Miami in the background from the South. (Yes, that's me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I bet you
wouldn't have it any other way.

I don't think the OP said anything about piercings, but what the heck, I guess you are correct. Body art from the shoulder down to the wrist would
be distracting. Gold teeth, not so much except for a compete grill with sparklies.

been here in sunny floriduh since 77, never been to Miami or the keys. Just didn't feel the desire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I lived in Palm Beach county the first 10 years I was here.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 04:12 PM by Edweird
That will always be 'home' to me.

Dress codes and appearance standards are to be expected - especially in a profession like law enforcement.

The jewelry restrictions at my job are simply because metal conducts electricity and the last thing you want is an arc. That means death or a fate worse than death. It's all about safety. They don't care if you are 'sleeved' with tattoos - nobody's gonna see them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'd recognize you anywhere!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. LOL, we all look alike :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chowhound Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. i don't get that attitude of
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 05:20 PM by chowhound
i don't get to have it therefore i don't care that you lost it. ie:
so, i dont get to wear piercings therefore i dont care that you dont
so, i dont get vacations therefore i dont care that you lost yours
so, i dont get health care therefore i dont care that you lost yours
so, i dont get a raise therefore how dare you go on strike to get one
it's this defining what others should be allowed to have based on what you settled for. it's an attitude that i hear allot of that i dont get.
it's more of that saying 1st they came for..... etc. no offense to anyone but i think we need to stop responding that way. it fuels the race to the bottom.
what you say your boss just dropped your salary to 1$ a day? so, that's all I get.. such is life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Really. Tattoos are the equal of vacation, retirement and pay

OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. No, that's not really the point.
I don't believe it's unreasonable to expect professionals to maintain a professional appearance. Do you? I brought up the fact that I have to wear what I wear in response to the 'oh they'll be HOT in the summer' statement. M<y response is
that they will learn to cope with it just like I have.

Not being allowed to have visible tattoos or piercings is the least of the restrictions on a police officer's life. There are all sorts of restrictions on what you are allowed to do and who you are allowed to associate with. In other words, they even dictate who they can and cannot be friends with. That's part of being in law enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-11 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
67. The unions representing them did not object to the new rules:
Lamberti said the two unions that represent road deputies and other workers (including jail deputies) didn't object. He said there might be some grumbling from affected workers, but he hasn't heard any formal complaints.

more: http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/columnists/mayo/blog/2011/01/broward_sheriff_bans_out_of_co.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nothing spells freedom better than non autonomy over one's own body.
"Land of the Free!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. They can still do it.
They just won't have a job with the sheriff's office.

I live down here and have never seen a cop with gold teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Telling someone they will lose their job if they use gold on their teeth or tattoo their skin
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 04:45 PM by Xicano
Is no different in principle than telling a woman she will lose her job if she gets pregnant.

In both cases the employer is restricting the right of autonomy over one's own body as a condition of employment.

Both are totally repugnant to the principle of "Land of the Free"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Tattoos and grillz = pregnancy?
Damn, I learn something new every day!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Name-calling, Xicano?
Tsk, tsk.

It's a pretty common tactic for people who use logical fallacies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. To someone who misrepresents my post? Sure why not.
I'll say it again.. What part of "restricting autonomy over one's own body as a condition of employment do you not understand"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. So you STILL equate pregnancy with tattoos and gold teeth?

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
47. I would equate it to your body, your choice - and this is a govt job (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Your body, your choice
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 06:33 PM by Confusious
It doesn't have to be someone elses choice too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. So now looking at someone not like you is a problem? Really?
And here I thought I was on a progressive board that believed in choice and not judging others on their appearance.

Do tell us all how a cop with a tattoo harms you? I would really love to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. What if it was a tattoo across his forehead that said "GOD HATES FAGS" ???
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 06:54 PM by Vickers
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. There's more then just physical harm
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 08:41 PM by Confusious
I would think you would agree.

Now how can I put this?:

My personal opinion on the matter is that if I saw a "marines" or "army" or any military tattoo on a cop, my intimidation levels would be higher.

If I saw "My little ponies" or "care bears" on his arm, or pretty much anything else, my intimidation levels would go down.

It's a matter of the respect and command that a police officer needs to be able to have to perform his job. If he can't pull it off, things can get out of hand, and almost anything can effect that.

Now you really can't say "Only military tattoos will be allowed" so banning them all is the only course of equal action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. What is wrong with you?
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 04:52 PM by cynatnite
:shrug:

alerted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. My guess: whiskey and anonymity. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Wrong guess.. .
I don't drink alcohol. Just sick of misrepresentations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Of *course* you don't drink.
There now.

*pats Xicano's back*

Feel better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Don't blame you...
:) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. No where near the same thing at all...
:eyes:

Besides, they have had the same requirements for the military for years. This is not a big deal at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "Restricting autonomy over one's own body as a condition of employment"
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 04:50 PM by Xicano
What part of that do you not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. As I said...this is nothing new at all...
The military is no different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. That's the least of the restictions on police officers.
They dictate who you can and cannot be friends with and where you can and cannot go and what you can and cannot do. It's all part of being held to a 'higher standard'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. I would like my local police officers to have tattoos and gold teeth.
Those should be prerequisites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. This is all about limiting certain groups presence in the police department
This is all about blocking anyone who is remotely counter culture from being able to be represented in the police force. This is all about creating an ideological purity in the police force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Sorry, but having tatoos and gold teeth isn't counter culture
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 05:39 PM by Confusious
It's culture.

It's counter culture to NOT have a tattoo these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. One man (or women)'s opinion
It is certainly about limiting a certain group of people from being represented in the police force. Whether or not it is counter culture (My opinion) or just a different culture (your opinion) doesn't really matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. What group of people?

Are gold teeth and tattoos an ethic group?

Are they part of a religion or a culture?

If you work with a part of the government that should be respected or asks for respect, look and dress like it. I really wouldn't take a cop, judge or president seriously that had gold teeth and a shitload of tattoos.

I would probably wonder if they were hiring from the local prisons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. The people who have tattoos and piercings
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 06:19 PM by Taitertots
What makes you think that the only relevant groups of people are races and religion? Don't forget that tattoos and piercings are without question part of the various cultural subsets within America.

40 Million people have tattoos and now they are systemically being discriminated against in hiring, in addition to having almost no representation in business and government. Not to mention the bigotry the face from people like you.
http://www.skininktoday.com/Tattoo-Designs/History/tattoo_statistics.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Expanding the use of bigot?
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 06:31 PM by Confusious
"The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing race, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, various mental disorders, or religion."


If you're stupid enough to do it to yourself, I really have little sympathy. If it's outside your control, I have all the sympathy in the world. You can remove tattoos and piercings. It does not in no way, in no universe, rise to the level of race, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, various mental disorders, or religion.

Don't forget that tattoos and piercings are without question part of the various cultural subsets within America.


Would you happen to have a recognized subset? or a list? or is it just because you say so?

40 Million people have tattoos and now they are systemically being discriminated against in hiring, in addition to having almost no representation in business and government.


Really. because someone has a tattoo they are to be afforded representation in business and government? You have to fing kidding me.

I have brown hair, brown eyes and obsessive compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder. Where's my representation in business and government? I want a representative all my own. I'm a subculture of one, and I deserve it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. You are expanding the bounds of bigotry
"big·ot noun \ˈbi-gət\
Definition of BIGOT
: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance."http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot
You are being a bigot.


"1cul·ture noun \ˈkəl-chər\
Definition of CULTURE
1: cultivation, tillage
2: the act of developing the intellectual and moral faculties especially by education
3: expert care and training <beauty culture>
4a : enlightenment and excellence of taste acquired by intellectual and aesthetic training b : acquaintance with and taste in fine arts, humanities, and broad aspects of science as distinguished from vocational and technical skills
5a : the integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon the capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations b : the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group; also : the characteristic features of everyday existence (as diversions or a way of life} shared by people in a place or time <popular culture> <southern culture> c : the set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterizes an institution or organization <a corporate culture focused on the bottom line> d : the set of values, conventions, or social practices associated with a particular field, activity, or societal characteristic <studying the effect of computers on print culture> <changing the culture of materialism will take time — Peggy O'Mara>""http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture?show=0&t=1296430442

It is by definition an aspect of the subsets of American culture. That you would even ask for a list shows that you lack a fundamental understanding of what we are discussing. You are just a bigot who will do anything to justify your own bigotry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. I think the only bigot around here is you.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 09:08 PM by Confusious
"a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices"

I think you should focus on this part.

Calling someone a bigot with no proof in the second post is quick even for DU standards.

What I had derision for were your ideas on "culture" and "representation in business and government" for people with tattoos. You are not the entire group, and the entire group is not you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. You made it clear that you have bias against people with tattoos and piercings
What group am I bigoted toward?

I don't have tattoos or piercings. I'm just able to recognize that harsh restrictions against them is biased and creates a non-representative police force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. A bias does not equal bigotry.
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 10:13 PM by Confusious
You're ridiculous. You are taking things to the extreme.

I'm just able to recognize that harsh restrictions against them is biased and creates a non-representative police force.


What about the blonde cops with blue eyes then? of course we can't forget the blonde cops with dark eyes, they have to have representation. Of course, then there's the black cops with dark eyes and the black cops with light eyes.

O, hell. We'll just get one person from every ethnic group in the department, and the divide them up. We'll have to get the campers representation, and the mountainclimbers representation, and the homebodies representation.

Of course, then we need to break it down, so we get some from every ethnic group in who are tall, some medium, and some who are short, because you can't have shortism.

And then we'll have to break it down by number and type of tattoo, and piercing, so they all have representation.

Have to have one from every group:

one piercing, no tattoo
two piercings, no tattoo
three piercings, no tattoo
etc...

so they can all have representation.

no piercing, one tattoo
no piercings, two tattoos
no piercings, three tattoos
etc...

so they can all have representation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. You have a fundamental lack of understanding regarding representation
Are there any administrative rules that prevent any of those groups from becoming a police officer? Obviously not. So your response is nothing but trash.
They ARE refusing to allow the tattooed and pieced to become police officers.


Your post shows a fundamental lack of understanding regarding representation. Representative doesn't mean every group is absolutely represented by their percentage within the population. That you would even post this shows that you have no interest in rational discussion. Otherwise you wouldn't post things that you should know are false interpretation of concepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Seem to have a misunderstanding on your part

You seem to think I don't agree because I don't understand. That's arrogance on your part.

I understand, and think it's ridiculous. So my post reflected that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Then why are you repeatedly making statements that prove that you don't? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Maybe you're the one who doesn't understand
Edited on Mon Jan-31-11 02:05 PM by Confusious
There are already different classifications that divide people: race, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, religion.

Why do you want to create more?

It's also based on something people do to themselves, not something out of their control.

That's why I think it's ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
43. I disagree. NO executives or upper management I have met with in 30 years of work.....
have had a visible Tattoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. 10 years from now, if you're still in the workforce
Edited on Sun Jan-30-11 06:19 PM by Confusious
everyone will.

Pretty much everyone I have met, girls I've dated, all have had tattoos.

You also said "visible tattoos." I bet if you took a poll of everyone under 40, they would all, or most all, would have a hidden tattoo. It doesn't have to be visible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #45
54. Well, the police said "visible" also, so maybe that is what matters. It would to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. How is this any different than a dress code which everyone understands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #45
61. As an under 40 person, I don't think that would be the case
I agree that one doesn't have to be "counter culture" to have a tattoo, as I know many people who are not even remotely "counter culture" that have one. But I doubt the vast majority have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Maybe it's just my little world

Almost everyone I meet has a tattoo or a piercing. My dad even got one (ear piercing - thought I'd make that clear).

I don't even think there is or ever was any counter culture. It all gets eaten up in the consumerism Orgasmatron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. Suicidegirls should sue.


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. My kinda women. Them and 'God's Girls'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well I think that is a good idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
41. I agree. Visible Tattoos do not look professional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
53. That's not the only place by far that has such rules. And so what?
So what of it? I hate tattoos.
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jahlove17 Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. Gold Grill
You have to be clean-cut pigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-11 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
66. maybe too many of their cops have swastika tats & the residents
Edited on Mon Jan-31-11 12:02 AM by orleans
are starting to complain?

seeing a cop with a tattoo wouldn't bother me
seeing a cop with a swastika tattoo would definitely bother me

on edit: same with the medical profession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-11 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
68. In other news, A shortage of Deputies in Broward County presists
wonder if a new Sheriff is trying to assert his dominance....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC