Racing to find new lows in ghoulishness, Republicans sling lies to block bill against child marriage

[ck4829]

On Thursday, the House took up the International Protecting Girls by Preventing Child Marriage Act of 2010. The bill would ensure that child marriage is recognized as a human rights violation, and develop comprehensive strategies to prevent such marriages around the world. The legislation seemed likely to garner strong bipartisan support in Congress, and in the Senate, it did. But last night, the bill was voted down in the House by Republicans who argued the bill is too costly and could lead to increased abortions -- gripes the measure's supporters say have no basis in reality and are just excuses to kill the popular bill.

The measure, introduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), passed the Senate by unanimous consent and attracted a list of 42 cosponsors, including Sens. David Vitter (R-La.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.). It also had the support of nonpartisan groups like the YWCA. On Dec. 6, former president of Ireland Mary Robinson and Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post, praising the United States for stepping up: "This act illustrates how support for securing a just and healthy life for every woman and girl transcends politics."

The House version, introduced by Reps. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) and Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla.), had 112 cosponsors. What's interesting is that some of them -- such as Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) -- actually voted against the bill. In the end, only 12 Republicans backed the measure; nine Democrats defected to the GOP side. So what happened?

This week, a GOP whip alert went out about the child marriage legislation, saying that House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Committee on Foreign Affairs Ranking Member Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) all oppose it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/17/house-republicans-block-child-marriage-prevention-act_n_798382.html

If you REALLY think that it is acceptable to stop a bill against child marriages just so you can say you're pro-life, something that means it is OK to force girls into pregnancy as soon as they become pubescent, then there is something seriously wrong with you. So wrong that you need to see a crazed psychologist who specifically deals with monsters like you and you would probably need to be restrained Hannibal Lecter style.

[DCKit]

1. What's the legal penalty for enabling child rape? nt

[Creative]

2. International...? Unless something changed since yesterday, the US

does not make laws for the entire world.

[ck4829]

3. Except it doesn't do that

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-2103

[Creative]

4. I see...but the title of the bill is misleading.

It should be renamed to: The Preventing International Child Marriage Act of 2010.

In principle, I favor it; however, we cannot afford the "assistance" that this bill calls for. The US simply does not have the money to pay for things like this.