Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do we call it "DADT repeal"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 01:58 PM
Original message
Why do we call it "DADT repeal"?

Aside from the Clinton/Obama infighting, this is not "DADT repeal".

Prior to DADT, it was unlawful for gay folks to serve in the military.

The package that was DADT ended the ban on gays in the military, and it was as far a compromise as politics would allow at that time.

A "DADT repeal" would literally mean a return to a ban on gays in the military.

While I realize that some use the DADT acronym to refer to that PART of the package which has the bizarre free speech limitation, there is a tinge of "Clinton did something awful and now it is being fixed" to some commentary. Clinton got what he could get, and Obama finished the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because DADT is a statute, and they're repealing it.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It part of a larger package that legalized gay service in the first place /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Not exactly.
According to the law, being gay was still directly contrary to the goals of military service, based on the rules established by Congress. DADT was simply a set of guidelines to try and prevent gay individuals from being directly questioned about their sexuality, and to head off witch hunts for gay servicemembers. But being gay and serving in the military was not "legal" before the passage of this current bill, it was just in some ways protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. A very good point.
Without that first painful shot at the issue we might not have made it this far yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Many forget that Clinton actually had many Dem Senators and Reps that were against even DADT.
I honestly think Clinton was naive about the whole thing...with the military and those in his own party. Obama learned from that experience and also in benefiting from 18 years of some attitudes changing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because Congress' bill will repeal DADT, making it null and void.
Edited on Sat Dec-18-10 02:05 PM by Tx4obama
Then after that Obama will have to issue an executive order to change the old military rules (prior to DADT) to enact new rules regarding the enlistment of folks to serve without sexual discrimination.
Or perhaps there is something in the new bill that states folks can't be discriminated do to sexual preference in the new bill, I haven't heard anything about that yet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No.. It's a different bill

It's like the "repeal the Patriot Act" thing.

Any bill amends the US Code by adding or deleting specific language.

There is never a bill that says "undo that other one".

Strictly speaking, "repeal of DADT" would restore the ban in gays. That's not what's being done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What is happening today gets rid of DADT, that's what matters :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. You're right about one thing. Obama certainly finished the job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jeez
Can we just be happy for something good for once. Instead of trying to rehash primary rubbish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hell, you've been here longer than I have. You know the answer to that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhillySane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Typical Doublespeak
Used by the government. As if they are repealing something, truly. I'm with you. They had a chance to repeal lower taxes on the rich, and then sold it as some big stimulus package they had passed. They are constantly mindfucking us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because it's repealing the part of the statute...
...that's about don't-asking and don't-telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC