What Do You Think Free Republic's Jim Bob's I Q Is?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

[Obamanaut]

1. High enough that he's made his site attractive enough to have many

posts brought over here.

[Anakin Skywalker]

2. An IQ of less than 69 would make him a Moron!

[rasputin1952]

3. If the shoe fits...

:D

[divvy]

12. Isn't that spelled "moran"?

[AsahinaKimi]

4. Once I saw a horse stamp

4 times with its hoof, when its trainer held up a card with the number 4 on it. Jim would probably have a hard time figuring out where his foot was.

[B Calm]

5. Okay, who's Jim Bob?

[DemocratSinceBirth]

7. He's The Conservative Philosopher Who Brought Us This

"A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site."

[xor]

10. So basically he doesn't want any debating of it, because he knows his stance cannot withstand

examination, right? Is he the owner of that site? If so, that explains the shitty and barely usable 1990's style design.


*heh... I was looking at the sites markup and saw some commented out blocks, one was for CPAC, some text in the comment was "Free Republic no longer supports CPAC due to their partnership with homosexual rights activists"... I'm guessing this man has some conflicted sexual things going on if he's that scared of "teh gays". He must fear he will become gay too if he ever comes in contact with them. Seriously though, wtf? I'll never understand that.

[rpannier]

13. So then he's IN FAVOR of gays openly serving in the military???

His (ahem) logic would dictate that is his position

[xor]

16. I'm sure if we followed his "logic"(used loosely) out, it would lead to "tgays should be executed"

[Rectangle]

6. He's smarter than most of his posters, but that's not saying much!!

:eyes:

[dipsydoodle]

8. About the same a

carrot. Bit more than Palins which aproximates to that of a cabbage.

[blasto]

9. C+

nt

[burning rain]

11. I think he's between 91 & 99.

In more amusing JimRob news, in reply 332 on this DADT thread, he's told, "Damn, you really DO stink at debating." http://bit.ly/hr1MR1 And the poster isn't banned ("zotted," in Freeper-speak), at least for the time being!

[DemocratSinceBirth]

14. Most "Normal" Conservatives Have Made Peace With This Issue Long Ago

I had a fairly conservative Republican boss in the 80's ! and his staff was about one half gay. It didn't bother him a bit...

[pinboy3niner]

15. For the time being, indeed

He will be closely watched until, inevitably...

[DemocratSinceBirth]

18. We Don't Have An Open Debating Society Either

It would be interesting if both sites had a special section, cordoned off from the rest, where the right and left could debate.

[burning rain]

31. True.

But it's only reasonable to say that we're a lot more open than FR.

[terrya]

17. I'm reasonably sure he can tie his shoes and can tell time.

I don't know how that corresponds to his actual IQ.

[old mark]

19. As so many people here have stated previously, "IQ is a meaningless number"...

In Jim Bob's case, I heartily concur.

FWIW, many people on the right call us "Dumocrats" and "Lib-tards"when they do not call us worse...


mark

[DenverDad]

20. Same as my teabagger mother-in-law

A little smarter than I think he is, but not nearly as smart as HE thinks he is.

[dkofos]

21. Sub Zero

But he has found a way to make money off idiots.

[11 Bravo]

22. Room temperature.

(In an igloo.)

[Stevenmarc]

23. Can he spell I Q?

[spanone]

24. why no column with single digits?

[madokie]

25. 12

[eppur_se_muova]

26. A contradiction in terms. nt

[stevedeshazer]

27. I think he's pretty smart. After all, he's making a good living off his bullshit site.

There's a lot of good money spent by the useful tools over there to keep him going.

IQ too low? I doubt it.

Manipulative? Hell yes.

[TheKentuckian]

28. The number 78 springs to mind but I don't have enough observation to really guess.

[white_wolf]

29. Well judging by

his terrible 1990's website design he can't be too smart. I swear every time I see that site I keep expecting to hear a dial up tone.

[EstimatedProphet]

30. Doesn't matter. What matters is that he's a scumbucket.