Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Obama administration, faced with a choice of supporting the youth revolution or the camels...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
EyeofRamen Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:18 PM
Original message
The Obama administration, faced with a choice of supporting the youth revolution or the camels...
...unleashed on it, has chosen the camels.

"Obama has coddled his administration colleagues who support Mubarak, want him to stay, and support VP Omar Suleiman.

Unlike Obama, Wael Ghonim, the 28-year-old Google executive who helped instigate the Egyptian uprising, wants genuine change."



Juan Cole:
http://www.juancole.com/2011/02/wael-ghonim-vs-barack-obama-change-we-can-believe-in-yes-we-can.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, hell yes! We want another president who interferes in the politics of other countries.
Damn you, Obama! Send in tanks, troops, drones, and poison gas NOW!!!!1111one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. + a gazillion! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Well said
I'm sick of the morons who think he should have gotten involved with this. It would have been the worst thing for the protesters to have American government support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EyeofRamen Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I think the point of the article was how Obama
isn't standing up for Middle Class Americans like Ghonim is for poor Egyptians.

I somehow doubt Juan Cole, of all people, wants Obama to send in tanks, drones and troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Or, just not support the dictators, as he has chosen to do so far.
Your hyperbolic option is not the only alternative. But, strawman away...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or
Obama decided it wasn't our place to decide how the Egyptian people want to run their country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. While we fund, train and arm an army that detains, tortures and kills
Egyptians, Obama can't claim to be neutral or to have no influence in this situation. That's also true in many other countries, of course, where we arm the government for counter insurgency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Look
I grant that America buttresses dictators and despots. We've been doing so almost since our inception. I will also concede that our government does very nasty things without telling us. I will accept that president Obama is most likely upholding some of this behavior.

However, I will not agree that president Obama should have taken a public stance on the uprising in Egypt. And I am sad that Juan Cole has apparently fallen victim to hyperbole and cheap sloganeering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Robert Fisk pointed out that the tanks in Tahrir are American property.
He noticed that in addition to the Aribic characters, they also had English lettering -- reserve equipment that the Pentagon keeps there as it does in many places.

Those tanks are a very public stance, one that hasn't changed and likely won't change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Like I said
America has been making money selling our munitions to other nations for a very long time. I don't see why this should be considered to be some sort of fresh revelation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. It's not a fresh revelation, only an illustration of where the government comes down
on the Egyptian conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. And before they were American tanks they were Russian tanks.
Do you imagine there would be an absence of military equipment if the US stopped arms to foreign countries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. The topic was Obama's public stance. As it happens, Germany and France
have suspended arms sales to Egypt but we didn't and Britain didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Now wait a minute
Considering you're the one who started the veer to off topic points in this thread, what does this mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Pointing out that Obama's government has taken a position is not OT
but a direct response to your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. HaHa!
Okay. You go with that then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Exactly! It's our job to sign the aid checks and STFU!
We certainly shouldn't tell an aid recipient* whether or not we approve the way in which they're using the American taxpayer's funds.

* = Yeah, yeah, we've reduced aid payments to Egypt in recent years, but it's still > 0.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. But, we can lend monetary and vocal support for dictators?
That is some double think you want us to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. bullhockey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bullshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whattheidonot Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. huge.
this revolution is huge. If successful it will change the world. The global system will change and there will be more equitable capital movement. The alternative is US is failed and a war in the Middle East. Egypt will become radicalized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EyeofRamen Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Does the link go somewhere else or is everyone
seeing an entirely different story than I posted?

The story I posted has NOTHING to do with Obama getting involved in Egypt other than mentioning his support of Mubarak.

The story I posted has to do with the differences between how Obama is governing (to the right: supporting billionaires, the PATRIOT Act, etc.) and how Ghonim is actually effecting the very change that Obama kept telling us he was going to do.

What are you guys talking about tanks and stuff for?

I'm new here, but man! What's up?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It's not unusual for posters to leap to Obama's defense
instead of considering the material if it is critical of Obama as this piece is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whattheidonot Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. BO
Bush - Obama, the former the worst, the later most disappointing to put it mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EyeofRamen Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Ah... thank you.
While I think Obama is a far superior choice to McCain, I also think it's unAmerican to never question our leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't get this - Obama is, verbally at least, supporting the protesters.
Is this article about behind the scenes stuff? Because it doesn't line up to what Obama has been saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. "Supporting" them while advocating Egypt's chief torturer take Mubarak's place.
I imagine most Egyptians can see his "support" for exactly what it is. Thank goodness -- too many Americans here can't, or won't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. Has the "progressive movement" suddenly gone Neocon? If this was
truly, as has been advertised, "a people's revolution", then let "the people" sort out their impending new democracy. The Egyptian people chose to take to the streets to overthrow the current regime, but did they consult this adminstration about it? And if they didn't, why is it expected that this administration should sort out their revolution? They're about to learn that democracy can be messy, and Pres. Obama is POTUS, not Egypt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EyeofRamen Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Howdy neighbor!
I'm in Tennessee.

I see from your user name that you're either in North Carolina or from there!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC