Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 01:00 PM
Original message |
| Will those discharged during the "DADT" era now be reinstated? |
|
It would be a major injustice if THAT was bargained away as part of some "deal".
|
| WonderGrunion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I believe they have to re-enlist |
|
They will not be forced to return.
|
| Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. I didn't think they'd ever be FORCED to re-enlist if they didn't want to. |
|
It was more a question of whether they'd remain militarily blacklisted.
|
| WonderGrunion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Everything I've read is that their dishonaorable discharges wiil be |
|
removed upon signing this bill and they will have the opportunity to return to service if they choose.
|
| Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Just wanted to make sure permanent proscription of the DADT dischargees wasn't another "brilliant compromise" that somebody threw in. You can understand why a person would wonder.
|
| jdadd
(950 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-19-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. There's no reason they shouldn't be. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:14 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
