stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:16 PM
Original message |
The Extreme Lefties In Our Party Should Be Kissing Obama's Ass Over The Tax Compromise |
|
One fact says it all: 80 votes in the Senate for cloture to move this bill forward.
What does that tell you?
It tells you that for all the screaming and whining and name calling, the fact is that the Ds in the Senate wanted this bill and they wanted Obama to take the bullet for it. The fact is that he's a big enough man that he did.
The Senate could have fashioned their own bill YEARS ago. They passed on that. They knew something had to be done, and they did nothing. They knew that the only way a bill on the bush tax cuts was going to be passed in the Senate was if the upper-income cuts were extended in some form.
But they didn't have the guts to do it because there was an election afoot.
So Obama - bless his heart - has actually come to the rescue of the Ds and the progressive wing of the Party by making the same deal the Senate Ds would have had to have made in the end. But by doing it himself, by taking the onus of holding his nose and making extending the bush tax cuts HIS decision, rather than that of the Reid and the other Senate Ds, he allows himself to be the target of liberal scorn while providing them with, 1. the basic legislation they would have done themselves and, 2. cover for their own inaction and cowardice.
This is a measure of the greatness of this man. That most DUers don't get this is sad, but it doesn't make it any less true.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
59. Me, too. Not that it seems to make any difference in that 0 figure. |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #59 |
127. Likewise, and posting this: Obama plan will raise taxes on 150,000,000 Americans |
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
121. Kanzen Jisatsu Manyuaru |
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #121 |
129. Are you suggesting I kill myself? |
|
That's a pretty weird post dude.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #129 |
|
wrong area, didn't mean to respond to you.
Well, I thought the liberal attack by the OP sucked.
|
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #134 |
135. Either way, you might want to reconsider. |
|
I've seen what that does to people, my friend.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #135 |
136. 'The Extreme Lefties In Our Party Should Be Kissing Obama's Ass" |
|
Sorry..... I would rather kill myself.
|
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #136 |
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #139 |
148. I kiss no politicians ASS |
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #148 |
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #149 |
150. Yet you accepted the OP's shit. |
|
for a moment in order to respond to me.
|
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #150 |
152. No, I did not accept anything. |
|
And really, what good is an argument between us going to do? I don't seek one, and I would encourage you to not seek one as well.
I wish you no ill, and my hopes are that you have a good day.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #152 |
153. Well at least you understand my Japanese |
|
But not culturally in its context.
|
asdjrocky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #153 |
154. Lol, no, I'm not Japanese. |
|
And it is to my regret that I'm born immersed in American culture. You know, Santa, the Easter Bunny and working til you die. It's true, I have a uniquely American view and it often shows when talking with my friends from Palistine, or Jordan, even Mexico and yes, Japan.
I am, however, always willing to listen and learn, I find it's my own sneaky way of being un-American.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #154 |
155. I'm Past the Point of being 'UNAMERICAN' |
|
Nationalism is what they use to corrupt you.
|
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
bajamary
(427 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I gather that standing for real financial reform, for the middle class, for the poor, for the unemployed and keeping social security safely away from those that wish to destroy it (aka being sanctimonious) will stop me from ever supporting Mr Obama ever again. Then so be it.
As a child of FDR Democrat parents, I will not stand by as Mr Obama and his uber-wealthy friends in both parties, destroy the American middle class and the great upward mobility that this nation has given my great grandparents, and all those who still come to our shores for the opportunity to build a better life with the freedoms guaranteed by the laws of this great nation.
No, I will never vote for Mr Obama again. Let alone kiss his a**
I am looking forward to supporting a FDR Democrat in the 2012 primary race for president, and one who understands that this great country is only great because of the opportunity it gives all citizens.
These tax laws will actually increase the taxes paid by family who make $40,000 or less and by those of us individuals who make $20,000 of less.
Yet the very top percent of the wealthy will continue to pay far less than they ever have paid, and as a direct result, our national deficit will be increased by another $850 Billion dollars.
Shame on those who vote for this monstrosity.
May the Ghosts of the New Deal haunt them, their children and their grandchildren forever.
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
42. There will be no serious primary challenge for Obama in 2012. |
|
Plenty of time for you to make other plans.
|
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
101. Not now there isn't... |
|
and by serious do you mean, anyone?
Right now, as the saying goes, I would vote for a yellow dog before I would vote again for Obama.
Please insert your favorite anti-Obama epithet toward me.
|
The Gunslinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
114. You support Democratic Party ideals that help the middle class... |
|
How EXTREME you are. That's just far left commie talk. You should just vote for Democrats and follow blindly when they act like republicans. (end sarcasm)
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Who would have thought that anyone on this board would claim "greatness" |
|
for a president willing to undermine Social Security?
|
Foo Fighter
(621 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
56. You must be new here. |
|
Everything Obama does is great. Even when it's the same thing Bush would have done (like passing a bill that gives tax cuts for the rich, for instance).
Bush advocated for the privatizing of SS and was rightly excoriated for it as that would have been the beginning of the end for the program. Obama did an end-run around and came up with a bill that will lead to the eventual dismantling of SS but that's OK because Obama has a "D" behind his name. Get with the program here.
|
Goldstein1984
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
60. Probably using the same measuring stick... |
|
used to award the Nobel Peace Prize.
|
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If that bill is a measure of greatness, there is truly NO HOPE. |
|
Since I know it isn't anything resembling "greatness", I can thank you for a good laugh!
|
bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Yeah, Bernie Sanders should be ashamed of himself. |
|
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
40. 8 hours on the floor of the Senate earns Bernie the support of a measly NINE Ds and 5 Rs. |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 10:47 PM by stopbush
45 Ds voted against Bernie. 83% of Ds voted with Obama and against Bernie.
There's not many Senatorial Ds left for the extremists to like, are there?
Al Franken. Sheldon Whitehouse. Robert Menedez. Chuck Schumer. Debbie Stabenow. Bob Casey. Byron Dorgan. Dick Durbin. Amy Klobuchar. Barbara Milkulski. Harry Reid. Barbara Boxer. Traitors all, right?
:nopity:
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
41. Then the problem is with the Democratic establishment |
|
The DINOs all need progressive challengers.
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
|
YES - the problem was with the spineless Senate Ds who wouldn't make this a campaign issue. Wouldn't bring forward their own version of the legislation.
That's my point.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
55. We differ in that I think Obama failed to show leadership |
|
(if he indeed is concerned about ordinary people instead of sucking up to the rich and powerful).
He should have announced that he would veto any bill that extended the tax cuts. And then done it. And sent every Dem home to go on their local radio and TV stations and give newspaper interviews and put stuff up on their websites and tell their staffers to post in online forums that the Republicans were acting like 2-year-olds and not willing to help desperate Americans because they thought it was more important to give a gold-plated Christmas present to the billionaires.
I swear, the Dem establishment either has the worst PR team in the world or it is complicit with the Republicans.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
76. He should have pumeled them over the head with it |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 12:41 AM by Confusious
The republicans have no heart. The republicans don't care about children. The republicans don't care about working families. the republicans....
He just let it go.....
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
108. Yes, that worked so well in the midterms. |
|
Some people around here have problems with short-term memory.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #108 |
|
As far as I remember, he didn't do shit during the midterms.
The "Democrats" ran away from everything he did.
|
Hawkowl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
|
They are complicit. Nobody is that stupid. They are virtually all millionaires and plan on getting richer. They really don't give a shit about the average person IF it goes against there own interests.
|
MH1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
94. No, they don't. They need progressive challengers WHO CAN WIN IN THEIR DISTRICTS. |
|
And we showed how that was done in the 2010 mid-terms right!! Oh wait ...
|
creon
(723 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
|
Most of the elected Democrats need to be replaced by people with a greater sense of urgency and commitment than the current ones.
|
upi402
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
74. All Hail the UNIPARTY |
|
Do not struggle, it will only be worse for you.
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. YOU'VE discovered Acronym Tourette's. |
HughBeaumont
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
96. OK, I got everything but the "A" . . . |
|
:rofl:
Yes, we should be applauding the blasting of yet another canyon hole in the debt to appease the rich (who we should be dragging through the streets, not placating)!
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #96 |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 12:29 PM by Commie Pinko Dirtbag
Edit: I forgot to add "IAF".
|
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
9. wow, we should kiss the ass of Obama for continuing Bush tax cuts |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 10:22 PM by quinnox
for rich and proving his words on this that he repeated a million times to get elected were worthless or a lie. Mind boggling.
|
Foo Fighter
(621 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 11:09 PM by Foo Fighter
Just like we should kiss Bush's ass for passing them in the first place because if they're a good thing now, they must have been a good thing back then, right? After all, just look at how many jobs those tax cuts created.:sarcasm:
Mind boggling indeed.
|
Octafish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
93. You're not looking ahead. |
Raksha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #93 |
137. Great cartoon, Octafish! 19th century style, 21st century relevance. |
|
Wish I could recommend just the cartoon, because I'm sure as hell not recommending this topic.
|
Toucano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 10:22 PM by Toucano
wrong response.
:-)
|
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Do you really believe what you are shoveling? |
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
45. Yes I do. Think about it. |
Scurrilous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Epic subject line! :thumbsup:
|
JackDragna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
My god, you're a comedian. Let's see..hundreds of billions for the wealthy, a fraction of that for unemployment benefits. Then he goes on TV and scolds us for clinging to principle. My god, if we get any more "greatness" from this charlatan, we'll all go under.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
15. What does it tell me? |
|
It tells me that we need some new Senators.
But by all means, crow about this legislative "victory." I'm not sure if I want to keep a log of folks who are happy and excited about this, as I think it is one of the most disastrous pieces of legislation to come down the pike in a long time, and I'm including NAFTA and the hideously misnamed USA PATRIOT Act in that estimation. It's not kind to kick people when they're down, and the misery that's coming thanks to this horror is going to make a lot of paupers out of today's applauders. They just refuse to believe it.
|
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Uh, he BROKE a campaign pledge... |
|
And we're supposed to kiss his ass for doing so? Sounds like bait-and-switch to me...
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
67. He would have broke a campaign pledge if he let taxes go up on 98% of the American public but people |
|
here seem to cheer that idea.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
17. More a measure of how much a sucker he is |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 10:26 PM by Confusious
A "great man" or "great person" would have never been in the position in the first place.
2 years from now, we'll be back in the same spot, hell, one year from now when extended unemployment expires ( 1 year is all he could get? ppppffffttt.)
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. I fear we're the suckers |
|
We're the ones who voted for him.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
27. Feels like it, don't it. nt |
Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I take it you accept the attack on Social Security included in the bill as a necessary "compromise". |
|
Please explain why it was necessary and unavoidable.
Thank you.
|
Indydem
(866 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
OBAMA wanted the 2%, not the Repukes. He GOT that. Thats part of the awesomeness that he got out of extending the fucking tax cuts for those rich bastards.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Chan790
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Unrec for being delusional. |
|
That might be the most logically-contorted thing I read all day.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
You all just don't see what a great man Nevil chamberlain was. He set the entire thing up so he could take the bullet and Churchill could take over.
Someday you will all see.
|
Chan790
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
51. You might be my hero for that one. |
|
So many here are so unwilling to see how very like Chamberlain President Obama is.
I'm not one of them.
|
Andy823
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I totally agree! Congress had their chance, and they were to damned scared to come up with a bill and take a vote "BEFORE" the elections! They were cowards and now they are taking credit for "standing" up for the people while the president gets all the BS from those who should be pissed off at congress!
All I see going are democrats buying into the right wing BS from the trolls that keep on posting so much BS here! Every time I read a post from someone trying to get democrats to "stay" home and not vote, or to find someone to run against the president, I see either a troll trying to divide the board, or one of the long time "Obama" haters spewing the same old BS, or those who are gullible enough to believe that the man who has done more in less than two years than most presidents do in two terms, the man who's administration has created more jobs in less than two years than Bush did in 8, and the man who has a very long list of accomplishments is a bum!
Thank you for posting some reality!
|
butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
JoseGaspar
(391 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Lemme get this straight...
According to you, almost all of the Democrats in the Senate are sell-out tools who wanted to support upper-income tax cuts to begin with, but didn't want to get caught doing it...
Sooooo...
Obama stepped up and played the grand master tool all on his lonesome because he is a "great man"?
And this post is supposed to be in support of whom?
|
scarletwoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
24. I'll kiss NO politician's ass, thank you very much. |
|
They're supposed to be public SERVANTS, not our fucking rulers.
Obama is the sorriest excuse for a Democrat that I've ever seen in my 61 years. Same goes for most of the Senate so-called "Democrats".
They work for the wealthy elite, they don't work for us. I'll be damned if I'll EVER kiss the asses of millionaire politicians who think we should be grateful for the pathetic crumbs they drop from the table of the plutocrats while they stab us in the back.
Fuck ALL of them!
|
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
28. I'll kiss the ass of the top 1 % that own him and them |
|
kissing the ass of the middlemen is beneath me.
|
BulletproofLandshark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |
29. You people are as lost as our esteemed "leadership" in the Senate is. |
|
Obama deserves every bit of scorn from the left that comes his way. He abandoned us long before we abandoned him.
|
Autumn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
30. I'm sorry you have such low standards |
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
31. I will watch to see what develops. Opening social security |
|
for attacks from the right for the first time greatly disturbs me. Getting maneuvered into an all or nothing position greatly disturbs me. Harry Reid gets a lot of blame on that score. Losing the build America bonds greatly disturbs me. Kicking the can down the road yet again greatly disturbs me.
I think some may see a great victory here. I see the Republicans getting so much of what they wanted once again by simply standing up to Obama that I believe his and the Democratic bargaining positions are now gone. Let us see where this leads. We are still waiting on health insurance (nee health care reform), the bank bill was weak, the stimulus tepid. There has been little real world change from these except college kids getting extended coverage so far. I expect the health insurance to be greatly changed by the time it is implemented. I also expect that social security and medicare will be on the firing line, thanks in some measure to this great addition to the deficit.
But I am tired of arguing this. I will no more persuade you than vice-versa. I have been invited off this board several times today. I am not a wild eyed lefty. But today I am being branded. I do know that give a republican a small hole and they will rip the dome open.
|
KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
32. So trust the senate? LOL |
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
hulka38
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
34. The Senate sucks too. |
|
I guess our tent is so huge that people can't help but stray into it every once in a while.
|
DontTreadOnMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
35. When the Repugs take over all 3 branches in 2012... |
|
they will overturn all of Obama's "accomplishments".
Obama will be left with the legacy that he was the first Dem to take a strike on Social Security. That is ALL he will be remembered for...
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
43. No one will be able to tell the difference |
|
and the DLCers will run around whining, "We can't do anything because we don't have a majority."
But when they DID have a majority, they let the Republicanites stop them with imaginary filibusters.
|
scarletwoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
|
Love the "imaginary filibusters" bit. :yourock:
|
Major Hogwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
63. And you'll still be here at DU then blaming the Democrats, as per the norm. |
|
And that is the problem with this forum. They can't get behind the President even when he is a Democrat.
Who was going to be the one who was going to tell the 2 million Americans whose unemployment benefits run out at the end of the month, sorry, we couldn't agree to renew your benefits IN SPITE OF THE FACT that we have a majority in BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS!?!?!
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #63 |
75. I could get behind him |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 12:23 AM by Confusious
If he:
Made a single payer system. Made meaningful reforms to wall street and the banks. Upheld the laws of the country. Didn't give tax breaks to the rich.
Everyone talks about ALL the GREAT things he's done. These things are what he will be remembered for, for GOOD or BAD, mostly bad IMO, the rest are small fry.
Of course, when these things go through the system, if it passes, it's because of Obama, if it fails, it's because of congress.
If you want me to get behind this guy now, you might as well place me behind boner.
|
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #75 |
EmeraldCityGrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
36. My how Democratic of you. |
|
Kissing the ass of greatness being such a Democratic tendency and all.
:sarcasm:
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message |
Ozymanithrax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
38. A college professor defined greatness in a president this way... |
|
A great President is one who sees something that needs to be done, that nobody wants to do, and does it anyway.
If this turns out all right, and ten or twenty years we are saying, we were wrong about Obama, we might consider him great.
But we are, at least, a decade away from any claim to greatness or abysmal suckitude.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
88. In this particular case, he's extending a ten year old policy that's brought nothing but |
|
disaster. You can pretty well bet that the critics won't be proven wrong on this one.
|
somone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Yeah, I bow before the supreme greatness of Obama |
|
I can't wait to make a special trip to Mount Rushmore to venerate his statue
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
46. So let me understand your logic. If he pushes a bill that will hurt social security, we should all |
|
be relieved because he is taking the heat for it, and somehow in your imaginination protecting the Senate Democrats from taking the blame?
He pushed this compromise, NOT the Senate, but even if the Senate did want this compromise if he felt the compromise was wrong, it would make him LESS not more of a person. I suggest he signed it because he didn't have a problem signing it.
If there are Democrats in the Senate who are for it, in two years when the deficiet is a trillion more, essentially no new jobs are created from it, and they need to cut social security because of it, I suspect there won't be too many progressives ready to congratulate him
|
dana_b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
|
I'm also not too happy with my Senators and I'm pretty sure my congressman will follow suit. People who are all for this today are going to be pretty dismayed in a few years when they are gutting SS.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
69. But WWHHHHOOOO could have seen that happen? |
|
I mean, it just popped out of nowhere. How could we have known?
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
47. DLC talking points. No sale! |
newspeak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
49. wait-I'm having a hard time just getting pass "extreme lefties" |
|
Did ya'll know that FDR was nothing but a damn communist. A communist, I tell ya. And Eisenhower who stated that a politician who messes with SS, it's political suicide. Another damn commie.
I stated before the midterm elections, that I wanted to see the house and senate filled with democrats--I wanted to see if any major progressive economic policies would be realized (another words "put your money where your mouth is"). But, if the repukes gained the majority in one or both houses, it would be cover to implement some very nasty policies. Ahh, the great american stage and most politicians missed their acting call. I just love some of that faux concern and crying--Boner especially does it so well. Sob Sob, those poor billionaires (sniff) (sniff) you can't expect children of billionaires to pay taxes-think of the children.
We can argue back and forth, but in two years, let's see where we, the people, really stand. In two years, let's see if we lose even more ground because of this obnoxious bill-and, let's see if the repukes are still going to be crying over the deficit (a deficit that they clearly are responsible for under Little Boot's reign). And then we can look at which way the winds blow for SS. Watch the theater and drama brought to you by our own greedy, self-serving supposed to be representatives of the people.
|
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
70. HA! little boots That's a good name for him |
|
He matches the roman too!
|
Art_from_Ark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
82. Apparently, "extreme lefties" today are people who are to the left of |
theophilus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
50. This is actually an indication that government of the people, for the people |
|
and by the people has just perished from the earth. No reason for celebration, imo.
|
meow mix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
52. i hope his new base does well for him. |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |
53. another liberals and progressives are &^%(%^ post. whatta surprise tonight nt |
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
54. Do you know anything about politics at all? |
|
Your post gives us no clue.
|
hay rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If you were going for over-the-top delusional, you nailed it.
|
neverforget
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message |
AnnieBW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
64. THe D's didn't WANT it |
|
They held their nose and voted for it.
|
MH1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
95. Then why did they let it come to this? |
|
If they delivered a better bill to Obama before he made this deal, he would have signed it. But they chose not to do that. Or they were incompetent to do that. Take your pick.
|
NoodleyAppendage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
Hannah Bell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |
66. It tells me there are a lot of whores in Congress. what does it tell you? |
ProudDad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
72. There are a lot of eunuchs in congress |
|
Most of who couldn't fight their way out of a tissue paper bag.
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
Gold Metal Flake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:16 AM
Response to Original message |
71. Thank God the dismantling of Social security is finally under way. |
|
It will be Obama's greatest legacy!
|
Lucian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
73. This is the most idiotic thing I've ever read here on DU. |
|
Congratulations. You've outdone the other stupid stuff I've read.
Unrec.
|
quaker bill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #73 |
90. Give it another look, or wait a day. |
|
competition is not that hard to find. It is at least accurate in that it calls out the Senate as the place where the votes could not be found. Many postings here are not even this constrained to fact.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message |
78. Anything IS possible! Caving to the Republicans is now an act of martyrdom! |
|
I can't wait to see the nobility he will present us with when he caves..er...sacrifices himself...on Social Security.
|
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
Dappleganger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |
80. Please stop playing Bill and Ted with a past which never happened. |
|
But you go ahead and continue to believe that garbage.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:02 AM
Response to Original message |
84. You gotta share smokey treats with the entire class. |
|
and should want to. No mind can withstand a buzz of this magnitude.
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:16 AM
Response to Original message |
85. The corporations and billionaires can kiss his ass |
|
it's the least they can do after all he's done for them. :*
|
Norrin Radd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:20 AM
Response to Original message |
86. "Extreme" left is actually true left. eom |
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
87. Extreme left is apparently in the neighborhood of Nixon or so. |
|
The extreme left are ex pats, off the grid, or passed on for the most part.
When anyone uses the phrase "extreme left" in relation to present day American politics, you have a righty and not to close to any objective center.
The "extreme left" of today may well have been not too far off center of the Republican party 40 years ago. John Paul Stevens (or former most liberal Supreme Court Justice) didn't curveball and he was a moderate Republican (this was when they had liberals still), stayed pretty much the same and the country shifted so far that he went from middle of the Republicans to the "extreme left" of the Democratic party ideologically.
|
creon
(723 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #86 |
|
The USA, basically, has no extreme left.
"Extreme" is a mere insult.
|
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message |
89. In two years, you'll be stomping your feet and demanding "the left" come out and support this fraud. |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 02:40 AM by Marr
That's the really funny part.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:58 AM
Response to Original message |
91. What extreme lefties and if there were any, why would they kiss his ass? |
Karmadillo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 06:03 AM
Response to Original message |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
98. LOL....I thought this was The Onion for a second. |
Zhade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
99. You want Maoists and Stalinists to kiss that fucker's ass? Odd. |
|
As others have pointed out, you've gone completely around the bend. All that was needed was a middle-class-only tax cut bill. Make the Repubs vote against that -- it's a win. But instead, they extend the free money for the undeserving rich, a policy that created all the unemployment in the first place.
And like a fool, you cheer for the continuation of a b*s* policy that helped destroy our economy. Fuck that, and fuck EVER kissing the ass of any liar who betrays his campaign promises to do the opposite. You're insane if you think that should be applauded.
|
Iggo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #99 |
|
:applause: :fistbump: :toast:
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
100. I can't limbo no more! The bar's been set too low. |
|
But it is roughly at Obama's ass level.
|
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
103. This thread crashed and burned. |
butterfly77
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
104. The President knows.. |
|
the games they play they did the same on the health care bill...He know once we got to January and the Repubs would vote in there own bill he would be blamed again..
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
105. that's the way I see it, sans the 'lefties should be grateful' stuff |
|
He took the hit for them and it will benefit them politically. That doesn't make the entire mess correct, though. Congress was negligent in not resolving this until the last minute. The President begged them to move forward, but they refused. They're more satisfied acting as if he wrote the bills they're voting on.
|
blindpig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #105 |
109. He took a political hit for the ruling class.... |
|
and appears ready to take more, a true and faithful servant.
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
116. Is there some other U.S. government that I'm not aware of? |
|
Pointing out that they're the 'ruling class' is hardly jolting. Are we getting any closer to holding them accountable? Silly, really, to allow them to hide their intransigence and negligence behind the initiative of this quarter-term president.
|
blindpig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #116 |
122. 'We' will not 'hold them acountable' by asking their servants |
|
to do it for us.
And that goes for both parties.
|
bushisanidiot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
106. Yep. He provided a hell of a lot of political cover for many dems |
|
who will be voting against. I hope not many do vote against though, as those on unemployment are waiting, desperately, for help from us.
|
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
if it wasn't so sad
stopbush - except his tax policies once Obama supports them.
Amazing, isn't it. There was only 1 Republican who voted against it. We can always be bipartisan when we vote for things that every Republican wants.
I lost a little bit more respect for Kerry, Harkin and Franken today.
|
Vinnie From Indy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message |
111. I think the answer is quite simple actually |
|
Many of the Senators simply got outmanuevered and boxed in. They are forced for a variety of reasons to support this monstrosity of a bill.
The fact is that it was the Obama folks that put off this fight after taking office. YOu can bet that had the Obama Administration actually fought publicly for sensible tax reeform and took their case to the American public, we might have won this debate. What happened instead was a backroom deal that was sprung on Democrats in the House and Senate.
I think the Senate tally of Dems voting for this bill is more a reflection of choosing which battle to fight and when to fight it. I secretly hope and do believe that many Dem Senators feel snookered by the Obama White House.
|
Bandit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
112. "Main Street not Wall Street" |
|
Yep I believe everything Obama has to say about anything.. He is the equivelent of God...
|
Iggo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
113. It tells me that 80 millionaires want their tax-cuts? |
pgodbold
(953 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
117. Someone please call idiot removal services. Thank you. |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message |
118. You're pointing out that a right wing Democratic Party and a right wing Dem president .... |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 02:53 PM by defendandprotect
have now done what Repugs were unable to do for decades --
This is the "measure of this man" -- but it is certainly not of greatness --
Rather as we understood when Repugs did things like this it is the strong attacking the weak.
:puke:
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Saw it already with Al Franken's cute little email. He disses the President and then goes on to say he's voting for it.
Hiding behind obama.
And yet most Americans are in favor of it. It's not even needed.
|
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message |
Xicano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
125. Answer me this: How does continuing a policy which caused this mess help? |
|
You act as if the logic of this bill is the solution to get us out of the mess it created. Have you been asleep for the last 20-30yrs? You do realize that the delusional mind believes if you keep trying something that's a proven failure it will somehow one day work.
|
True_Blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
126. Unrec for calling Democrats 'extreme lefties' because we're not kissing ass |
|
Is believing in the Democratic core values an extreme leftie position now? I've always considered myself a moderate, and I have extreme concerns with the urgency that a right-winged agenda is being pushed through that will end up probably being the final nail in the coffin for this Country. Is he afraid the GOP won't pass it when they get in?
I feel like I'm having a nightmare where Enron execs are plotting to steal our retirement right before everything collapses.
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
Raksha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
130. One of my very few unrecommends--maybe my second one. |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
131. Yes, one can see how giving billions to billionaires would be the position of the "Extreme Lefties" |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 03:43 PM by WinkyDink
YOUR CLAIM CONCERNS A NON-REALITY.
But hey, if you know who's going to win the Kentucky Derby next year,.....
|
Goblinmonger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't think most people got it. It seemed to me like "extreme lefties" was a good shock of recognition early on, but nice jab at the spineless Dems in Congress.
|
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
133. Ahhh, but how irrefutable facts grind hard on unwilling ears! Excellent OP; Kick, Rec. n/t. |
Xicano
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #133 |
141. Hearsay = "irrefutable facts" ? LOL |
|
The entire OP is presumptuous at best.
|
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
138. All this explains is that our Congress is full of elites who care nothing for the working |
|
people of this country. That you buy into it is just complicity on your part.
|
creon
(723 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There is a lot of truth in that post. except for 'extreme lefties". There are not very many of those at DU, and not very many of those outside DU.
Obama did what he thought that he had to do.
It is unfortunate that it came to that; but, it did.
It, also, follows logically from the conduct of this Congress over the previous two years.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
143. "by making the same deal the Senate Ds would have had to have made in the end" |
|
What is your argument for this?
|
The Midway Rebel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Points for a succinct and descriptive post of the real politik of how the elites are f*cking the middle class out of their money.
k&u for supporting it.
|
walldude
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
146. Well ignoring the fact that what you posted was an opinion |
|
and has no basis in reality, ignoring that, why would the extreme left do anything for you or Obama? Whenever the "extreme left" asked for support we were shot down at best and made fun of at worst. HAHA YOU DIDN"T GET YOUR PONY...
Yeah.... we'll get right on supporting you and Obama and the Democrats...
|
Uncle Joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
151. When was the last time that the "extreme left" controlled the Senate? |
|
Thanks for the thread, stopbush.
|
coalition_unwilling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-14-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
157. unrec. If they had done nothing, the tax cuts would have expired on their own! - n/t |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-14-10 05:07 PM by coalition_unwilling
|
Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-15-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |
158. That's a very funny tall tale you tell on why Obama has an alliance with Republicans on the tax bill |
|
Taking a bullet for congressonal Democrats.
Yes indeed, that's Obama's style.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |