Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I get nervous when the media start talking about "Obama victories"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:35 PM
Original message
I get nervous when the media start talking about "Obama victories"?
Such as the taxcuts extension.

They really don't care that Obama gets the credit if they get what they want. Repubs always "want" in the short term. They will worry about the other bridge when they get to it.

Because they know the media will support the Repub position because they support the position of the mainstream media and their profit motivations.

I wonder more and more just how much opposition is within the Democratic Party? Are they capable of opposing the Repubs and the MSM anymore? Are they even relevant in this new political world?

I wonder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how many times people are going to ignore the President
saying he didn't support the tax cuts for the rich either? But he supported unemployment extensions and the tax breaks for the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And half of America did not even know he was fighting for it.
The cartoon of the card game: "I fold".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That was an unforgettable cartoon.
Too bad it had to be negative about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Are you kidding, the unemployed knew.
They knew their lives depended on it getting extended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The president has 'said' a lot of things.
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 09:49 PM by Edweird
I can't imagine very many people taking him at his word these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I can't imagine them not.
He gets things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Republican things for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ha Ha Ha.
One republican thing and now they all are. Oh save us all from the bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I see. Which, in your mind, was the 'one republican thing'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Extending the tax cuts for 2 years for the rich.
The pubs wanted it forever, but 2 years made them happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I suppose you're blissfully unaware of the history of the 'individual mandate'
and the 'cadillac tax'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm aware of them both.
Are you saying they're republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Are you saying they aren't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The mandate is to get people insured.
The cadillac plans are from the ins co's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Republicans have been pushing that since around Nixon.
It was John McCain's campaign position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Mass. has it in their health care plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Right. Brought to you by Mitt Romney (R). Which is exactly my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. If I remember right Mitt is now saying he isn't for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. So he admits that it's shitty RW policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. No, he knows it works but he wants to run for prez and the teabaggers
won't love him if he tells the truth. Mitt is rather flip-floppy ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. You mean like promising not to sign a bill that doesn't contain a public option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
34. Here's your Progressive Liberal hero, Newt Gingrich talking about how great it is. June 18, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Here's your Progressive Liberal hero, Newt Gingrich talking about how great it is. June 18, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Is there some reason you are deliberately choosing to call Newt my hero?
Because it looks to me like you've lost the argument and are now resorting to personal attacks.

Which means it's time to tell you good-bye before it gets out of hand.

Have a good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. You. Got. Nothin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Wait, let me guess: You think McCain, Hatch, Romney and Newt Gingrich are all sercret liberals....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I must say that nonsense was expected.
Really, I think they're assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. You're right. They are RW republican assholes that supported the RW individual mandate.
Edited on Sun Dec-19-10 11:33 PM by Edweird
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Did you support it in 1993 when Orrin Hatch sponsored it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I've been for some sort of universal health care plan since I was
old enough to know what it means to pay up when you leave the hospital. I'd have to look up Hatch, that was awhile back. But I supported Hillary Clinton going for health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Insurance is NOT health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. It's more like a socialist Ponzi scheme...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Oh spare me the ponzi stuff.
To read here half the money in this country is ponzi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. It's the means to pay for it, and the means by which most
care is done. Until Medicare gets a huge infusion of money for the next 50 years we are stuck with insurance. Make the most of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. It's RW policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Whatever.
It is also subsidized in 2014.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. So it's 'subsidized' RW policy. Well hell, that changes EVERYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. BTW, you've not ONCE addressed the issue - you've simply been spouting talking points.,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. That's funny. I have a lot of posts in this and a lot of answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Oh ok. So remind me again where you showed the individual mandate isn't RW policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's pretty dark right now but within a few years, I see the MSM being more
and more irrelevant as the younger generations look for news elsewhere.

The demographics for the old style news media is skewed toward the older voters and they will start to drop off.

I don't know for sure but I would imagine that the demographics for Rush and Beck and Hannity are real heavy in the white male 50 and older area which is a static demo that has no chance of growing.

I think the generation that started to come of age in 2004 will be one that is more interested in getting things done instead of the paralysis that is ruining the country they will inherit.

I have a great deal of confidence that this contentious political discourse is a symptom of Boomer self examination, that they were raised to put themselves before anything. Look at th protests against the war. It wasn't because they were against the war it was because they might have to go and fight....

Think about it. Look at how they have behaved since they have been in power.

I'm at the ass end of the Boomer generation and I am disgusted with how things have turned out.

I have been around so many younger people that I am at least cautiously optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Youth will be served.
I have no doubt. It always is.

Obama is a fairly young dude himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Younger than me....
It's the older guys in the Senate that are causing all the problems, the guys 55 and older.

What cracks me up is this lament by the boomer's who are wondering what went wrong with the Utopian dreams that had in the late 60's.

The minute this generation came into power we enacted NAFTA...

Think about it, selling off the manufacturing base for the promise of cheap trinkets.

I was so upset about NAFTA but I felt that the self absorbed nature of the GOP was worse.

With the GOP you at least know they are going to fuck you over.

With the smooth talking democrats you have a knife sliding in while you are talking to them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC