Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New study finds baby boomers are in a funk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:07 PM
Original message
New study finds baby boomers are in a funk
(CNN) -- Eighty percent of baby boomers are pessimistic about the current direction of the United States, according to the Pew Research Center's Social & Demographic Trends study released Monday.

Who can blame them, with retirement and pension funds shrinking and with the unemployment rate near 10%?

The boomer generation consists of adults between the ages of 45 and 64, according to the The Pew Research Center, a nonpartisan think tank.

"Most Americans are pretty glum three years into a Great Recession and a jobless recovery, but even in that context, the baby boomers stand out," said Paul Taylor, co-author of the study and vice president of the center.

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/12/17/pew.baby.boomer.gloomy.outlook/?hpt=C2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. No shit. Pile all that on top of politicians gunning to cut Social Security and Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. They should have never voted for Reagan, especially twice.
Then they voted for Bush and Bush*.

All against their own best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There's a big chunk of they who didn't
:hi: :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. A lot fewer voted for Reagan than their elders did
I looked up the figures the last time this smear came round. About half of people in their 20's to early 30's voted for Reagan -- but 60% or better of all the older generations.

The Boomers were never uniformly liberal -- especially those in the South and Midwest -- but they were a hell of a lot more liberal than anybody else at the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I didn't mean it as a smear, sorry..
I'm just thinking about my boomer parents and 95% of their friends. They still think Reagan is gawd, and they all watch Faux newz today.

But you're right, I shouldn't have lumped everyone together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. I didn't vote for Reagan, and neither did anyone I knew at the time
In fact, we were all amazed and heartsick when he won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
73. I've seen people blame Gen X for Reagan! Most of us weren't old enough to vote in 80 or 84.
Sadly, there's a lot admiration for him among my cohort but you can't blame us for him getting elected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No this one of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Some did. *puke* Don't blame me!
But the politicians of both parties have been acquiescent in shippinmg many jobs overseas.

It's hard, seemingly impossible, for a 50 or 60 year old to get a full time good paying job these days. And good Democrats here are among those who suffer from underemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Yes...Me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I didn't vote for Reagan or either Bush and I'm a boomer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Me too.
My husband and I think we'll probably have to work until we phisically can't. We are both blessed to have good jobs and moderate 401k's, but we were counting on SS for some of our retirement. We're not counting on it at all now. If we do collect it, we will put it aside for the near future when we think SS will be discontinued. Such a shame that something that worked so well is so despised by those who will never need it. Why do they hold so much control?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Because money can buy power
and they have the money to buy power - and the control. They aim to keep it that way too....and they have a lot of help from people who enable their own oppression (by supporting those who do screw over 'the people')


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Agreed (with the help of the "greatest generation")
I've been screaming this from the rooftops. They squandered the American dream for their selfish gain. Remember "Greed is Good"? Saint Reagan loved that one. Of course not all the baby boomers are responsible. But you nailed it right one the head.


Peace
Max

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. none of my "Greatest Generation" relatives ever
voted for any Repuke ever. They learned a long time ago that these pukes are crooks!

Don't lump all of your corrupt eggs in to one basket.

It is not right to categorize people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Carter, Clinton, Gore,Kerry, Obama...
...here. Generalizing is not helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. never voted for ONE of these SOBS you name
did you? :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. This boomer never voted for either of them...Even once.
..and I don't know any others who did either, although some surely did...Especially the "younger" boomers who IMO, were too young to have ever been put
in that demographic in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. NEVER voted for Reagan or any Bush, and I'm a boomer.
Generalizations are always false, including this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Paint with a broad brush much? Giving GOP THEIVES a free pass?
tridim, I have some big news to share with you:, two of those elections were stolen. Yes! Stolen! I know it may come as a shock since the MSM didn't tell you as much, but it's true. Sorry to burst your baby boomer hating bubble.

And NO, some of us worked for the Democratic party during Reagan's reign. You, however, back Reagan's legacy 100% with your cheering of Obama's Reagan era policies. If you want someone to blame for our times then just look in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. I've already apoligized, and never said all baby boomers were Republicans.
I'm basing this observation on my baby boomer parents and their friends.

Sorry if you took it wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
53. Okay. I forgive...
...you...this time. ;) But don't let it happen again. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. 'they' is a great big false net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
62. Broad brush much?
I wasn't even old enough to vote the first time Reagan was elected. Voted for Mondale the second time. And I've never voted for a Bush in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
69. I did? I voted for Reagan, Bush, and Bush? Dang!
I thought I voted for somebody else. Now I can't remember ...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
72. who is "they"??
i know i didn't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. 45 years ago = 1965. These are NOT Baby Boomers, who are the children of returning WWII Vets!
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 01:25 PM by WinkyDink
Good grief; one born in 1965 could be the 1945 Boomer's CHILD.
GMAB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Agreed....I always thought that was absurd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Not necessarily just the children of WWll vets

The United States Census Bureau considers a baby boomer to be someone born during the demographic birth boom between 1946 and 1964.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. I don't give a rat's arse what the revisionists claim!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Those born between 1945/46 and 1964/65 had always been considered Boomers
Until Jonathan Pontell divided out those born after 1953/1954 into "Generation Jones" (me). Sometimes the two groups are defined as "Boomer l" or Boomer ll".

The revision was in the separation of the original group into those sub-groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
77. Interesting, I always thought the cut-off date was 1959. I heard there was a substantial dropoff in
births in 1960. Maybe that info was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Exactly! I see the post above you says the same too.
I'm 45 (just turned a couple of weeks ago) and I've NEVER been called a boomer before. Nor would I want to be. :P... :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Born in 1962. Dad was a Battle of the Bulge vet.
:shrug:

That said, my oldest sister was pregnant with her daughter while mom was pregnant with me. She's my niece, but just a few months younger than me.

So yes, it's an arbitrarily large demographic, and I don't have much in common with my older siblings born in the 40's. I think that a better demographic is 1955-1965 "Generation Jones".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Actually, Dad doesn't have to be a vet for you to qualify.
All that is required is being born during the burst of births following the return of troops. They settled down and had babies year after year after year after year. But not all the people procreating had been soldiers. NONETHELESS their children are included by dob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. True that. But a DOB of 1965
falls into the Generation X category in everything I've read about this subject. Except this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. That's a bit old for Gen X, too, though.
I think mid sixties is called Generation Jones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. No, It's Core Gen-X
Generation Jones is just the latest name for people who were initially called Gen-X and then "Baby Busters."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. Gen-X is folks born from 1961 to 1981, Boomers are 1943 to 1960.
According to the late social historian William Strauss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. That's the time lines I've always heard.........
And this boomer has ALWAYS been a socialist and NEVER voted for a single Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #60
79. Same here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. It IS the origin of the term, but okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Yep. The reporter is more than a wee bit off there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
63. These generational labels are completely arbitrary anyway.
I was born in 1963 and have never thought of myself as a baby boomer, but I still get labeled as such. I don't place much stock in these labels myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jokerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
66. Wrong.
My dad joined the navy in 1940 and didn't start a family until he retired 20 years later. He was 45 years old when his youngest child (me) was born.

Not everyone fits into a neat little mold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. another boomer here
I have been voting for democrats since the early 1970's. I can assure you, I voted against Reagan and every other ones of those GOP bums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. I've been in a funk since funkin Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. Don't say Recession, say Banana!
Yes, we have no Great Banana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. All right, already! I admitted I'm in a funk. Enough with the intervention!
Did my family tell you to do this, huh? ;-)
They've ordered me a light box for Xmas, which will be here Wednesday, and they've already insisted that I begin using it immediately. My GP recommended it, my retinologist agreed as long as I keep my eyes closed while using it, and an associate of his agreed but said I needed to wear my special sunglasses while using it.

Oh, and by the way - I didn't vote for Ronnie The Aged, either. I've been funked out since 12/12/2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. Well of course they are - their 401Ks were looted and they
are starting to retire - of course they are "in a funk" or even pissed off.

I'm in my 40s and still have foolish optimism that there is time to recover, but for someone who is 65 what are they supposed to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deja' vu for real ain't fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. hateful and ignorant comment.
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 06:29 PM by bettyellen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
41. Attention Baby Boomers:
Things may be bad now, but we've got to look on the bright side.

At least we'll have the sweet release of death sooner than all those young punks out there.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
43. And now it looks like we'll be losing the internet to big business and marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. This talk about different 'generations' is horseshit.
It's a ploy used by people in marketing to get people of a certain age to buy their crap. They're telling you that you have to jump on their bandwagon and buy their junk or you'll get left behind by the other Boomers or Gen Xers or whatever. Just because you share memories of the Ed Sullivan Show or Family Ties with some other guy doesn't mean the two of you have anything in common and it doesn't say shit about who you are as a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
45. It all depends on what sort of funk.
Doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #45
68. word!!
Waitin' on the mothership can sho nuff get ya down! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
46. I think boomers and millenials were hit hardest by the recession
Boomers want to retire and can't, their investments/home equity/jobs aren't stable. So they have to work until 70. Millennials can't break into the workforce since the boomers can't retire and the last 10 years have seen literally negative job growth (normally we'd create 20-30 million jobs over a decade. We created about 0 net jobs over the last 10 years. And tons of higher paying jobs were replaced with contract/temp work).

We are all fucked. I don't see 400k jobs a month coming anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Two and part of a third generation are now suffering...
as a result of this 'depression.' Those of us over 60 and on up into their mid to late 70s have almost no chance of finding work...even the part time jobs that older seniors used to have to supplement their pensions are now gone.

If you are in your 40s, you have a chance at recovery...those older are pretty much screwed.

And, no, most of the older seniors did not vote for Reagan but it sure looks like Obama might have given the chance. Reagan was the guy who set up a national office to help US Corporations move offshore. As we all know, this was a successful move that has resulted in major loss of manufacturing jobs...the kind that raised the rest of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
76. great assessment and I totally agree (I'm a millennial for the record)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. Hey Uh Kids? You're the BIGGEST FRIGGING VOTING BLOCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. LOL! + 1000! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
49. They needed a study to figure that out?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
51. everyone's in a funk....
....when the power of the economy resides in the hands of unelected officials, the result is we have no control over our economic future, unemployment, poverty or funk....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
54. You mean the boomers who took away all the social programs they enjoyed when they were young?
Then just left their kids fucked cause they fell for bullshit conservative talking points? Cry me a fucking river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Think much? Or do you always shoot from the lip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. I've thought about this quite a bit, so ask yourself the question you've just asked me
Edited on Mon Dec-20-10 10:55 PM by HEyHEY
The amount of government assistance for post secondary school, family allowance, healthcare, even elementary education has all been reduced greatly in the last 30 years. Meanwhile real estate prices have been allowed to skyrocket, low-cost rental housing has been allowed to be purchased and sold as condos... all this because of the boomers going on their overly capitalistic, conservative kick.

Now, my generation works twice as hard for half as much. Thanks guys. I suppose you'll want all the governments money to make your lives easier again when you retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
55. If I were a Boomer I would be in a funk, too.
If my retirement were being destroyed, SS being attacked, and my kids being stuck in a shitty job market with huge student debts I would be in a funk, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Do you think Odin
that President Obama could be the Gen X crisis leader that was predicted in The 4rth Turning by H & S?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. Not unless he quits acting like Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crystal Clarity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. I'm not referring to whether he's been a good or bad leader
S & H left that for history, not their prophecies to judge whether a crisis period leader is, or is not, a good one.

IMHO, they simply say that crisis periods often end up w/lost gen (or in this case, gen x) leaders and hero gens (in this case millennials) as their foot soldiers in whatever action is needed to deal w/a crisis period. The ultimate outcome, they say, can be good OR bad. As too, can be the leaders.

So my original Q was regarding your opinion as to whether or not President Obama may be that gen x crisis leader. I'm assuming by this Q that we definitely ARE in one right now btw.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
65. "Baby Boomers" is an it, not a them
If we are to be thinking people then one must generalize about a generation and determine what it wants. IN that way we can determine what is best for everyone in this country and the world. Each baby boomer is an individual who must be judged on their own merits. However, it is clear from all reasonable measurements the "Baby Boomers" are a malicious force in this world and must be dealt with to try to curb it's unending appetite for pleasure and wealth given to it by other people. They create little and demand all. And we have to control it before it destroys us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
67. I've been in the funk for a long time
Personally, I blame Clinton for it....this video explains it better than I ever could

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjKFCYzqq-A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
70. Lots of people focus on the good things Boomers experienced, but forget
we have been and will be till we are all dead, the targets of greedy schemes and plots to take us for every possible dime they could steal. We were told we would have a golden future ever since we were in high school...we have made tons of money for the bankers and politicians of every possible stripe, and we got nothing in return, and have left little as a legacy.
We have been conned and lied to and manipulated for all our lives and it is getting worse every day.

And, no, I have never voted for a republican in my life.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
74. Of course they are. Boomers were sold bogus hope & change and now Social Security
is on the chopping block.

Anyone who isn't mad as hell isn't paying attention or is so rich it doesn't matter. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
75. I imagine they are, especially the back end that has worked their lives away
under the diminishing returns of Reagonomics.

I'm in a funk myself, a few years younger. Every thing I have earned has been stripped away by unending waves of buy outs, shut downs, mergers, and outsourcing.

The 15 years since college has all been about building and crashing over and over and each time with less building space in between collapses.
A lot of boomers have lived the same crap for longer and they must be spent and disgusted at the wear on their minds, souls, and bodies and how little there is to show for it as well as how little room there is for playing catch up in a horrible environment of declining wages in real dollars and hemorrhaging opportunity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
78. Funk is putting it mildly.
It gets better after you accept the fact you've been screwed over and plan how to make enough money to exist in something better than a cardboard box. If . . . IF . . . you remain healthy. There's always the chance we'll find ourselves on a park bench reading "Final Exit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
80. Reality is a Bitch!
I'm older, fatter and slower.

I am bummed out about how society has changed, considering my ideals in the 1960s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
81. I guess I'll find the time to worry about this
But it won't be any time soon. Give me 20 years, maybe. I MAY slow down by then, but I'll only be 78, so maybe not.

The only funk I know is when I slap my bass guitar, and I haven't played bass seriously in five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC