woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:15 AM
Original message |
Chart of the Day: Alcohol Consumption |
Sabriel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:21 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Wisconsin should be red |
|
I personally have been skipping the brats and heading right for the "steamed in beer" part.
|
endless october
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:27 AM
Response to Original message |
2. respectable showing, but it looks like we have some catching up to do. |
mainer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That's some serious drinking going on there.
Would love to see similar charts for coffee and tea drinkers.
|
TaylorWatts
(53 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I suspect that Kvass drinking biases Russia a bit |
|
Kvass is like near-beer and it's sold by street vendors and given to kids without much reservation.
Not to say that Russians can't be hard drinkers, but fermented everything seems to be a cultural strength in Karelia.
|
AlabamaLibrul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
6. One litre of alcohol per person roughly every month on the high end, meh. n/t |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-22-11 08:47 AM by AlabamaLibrul
|
dmallind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Is that litres of alcohol or litres of alcoholic beverages? nt |
superduperfarleft
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
8. See that tiny red dot on the east coast? I think that's my house. n/t |
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-22-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I thought that was Washington DC. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 12:02 AM
Response to Original message |