Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama FCC Caves on Net Neutrality -- Tuesday Betrayal Assured

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
fatbuckel Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:01 AM
Original message
Obama FCC Caves on Net Neutrality -- Tuesday Betrayal Assured
Source: Huffington Post

Late Monday, a majority of the FCC's commissioners indicated that they're going to vote with Chairman Julius Genachowski for a toothless Net Neutrality rule.

According to all reports, the rule, which will be voted on during tomorrow's FCC meeting, falls drastically short of earlier pledges by President Obama and the FCC Chairman to protect the free and open Internet.

The rule is so riddled with loopholes that it's become clear that this FCC chairman crafted it with the sole purpose of winning the endorsement of AT&T and cable lobbyists, and not defending the interests of the tens of millions of Internet users.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-karr/obama-fcc-caves-on-net-ne_b_799435.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Toothless?
Everything this president does is toothless according to so many here...enough of the hate already....I don't trust Huffington Post....they have an agenda against this president...go to their site for 5 minutes and you can see that clearly....If John Kerry is happy with the new rules, so am I....he has been on this issue for a long time and knows what he's talking about.

Kerry Applauds FCC Support for Net Neutrality Rules
http://kerry.senate.gov/press/release/?id=c2dbd915-060b-4f69-9dd8-16638b943bcb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Another poison pill slipped into otherwise good legislation. You might want to...
...look at this piece which includes commentary from Sen. Al Franken: Franken: Under FCC’s ‘neutrality’ rules, ‘the Internet as we know it would cease to exist’

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well...
Kerry says the proposed rules are great and Franken says they are not....let's wait and see what the final rules are and then comment on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Hate?
Edited on Tue Dec-21-10 05:02 PM by bitchkitty
I guess you can call the intense resentment and disappointment I feel toward Barack Obama hate. But I don't. In spite of the fact that I don't think he will win another election, I will vote for him over the GOP or a third party.

I'm not going to pretend that I am pleased with the things he's done. I will speak up about it. Sorry that offends you. But dismissing the MAJOR disappointment many of us are feeling as "hate" is straight out of the GOP handbook. Try another word.

edit: typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well - we will see what happens tomorrow.
The loopholes are not comforting. And that's not
Really neutrality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama could suffer greatly from this
His campaign weighed heavily on use of the internet. The question is will people pay more for internet service to participate in the campaign through internet communications?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes again promises broken and lies over and over again
very disappointed in him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. .
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. No. God. Can people please learn the subject before getting worked up?
This is what activists have been working for for decades: Net Neutrality. The FCC is getting ready to actually apply network neutrality rules to cable and DSL connections. This is what we wanted.

The bill doesn't include mobile devices. For some reason this outweighs everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. completely manufactured outrage is teh awesome!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. "GOP Vows to Fight FCC on Net Neutrality"
from AdWeek:

Just one day after being named chairman and vice chairman of the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications, Technology and the Internet Reps. Greg Walden (Ore.), Lee Terry (Neb.) and Energy and Commerce Chair Fred Upton (Mich.) called for full release of the FCC's net neutrality order, blasting the FCC for lack of transparency.

On the Senate side, 29 GOP Senators, including Commerce's ranking member Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (Texas) and Sen. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) sent a letter earlier this week urging the FCC to back down from regulating the Internet.


Certainly sounds like a cave to me.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Twelfth OP with this title since yesterday
Maybe you need a new scary headline: like Obama FCC Netracide: Earth's Communications to Be Obliterated

And then come Christmas Day, none of us will be posting here anymore. There will be no more free Internet.

Please folks, stop using HP tabloid material. It's the equivalent of Woman Gives Birth to Child with Three Heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wow. The Obama administration adds regulations to a previously-unregulated medium
Edited on Tue Dec-21-10 11:54 AM by Recursion
...a step, mind you, that Bill Clinton decided was too "activist" on the government's part, and people complain that it doesn't also address mobile phones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveofCali Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. When did broadband companies own the Internet?
The Internet is government domain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. They always have...it has never belonged to the Governement
The Internet is a group of private networks that have agreed to certain technical standards. The basic technology and standards evolved from DARPANET and some NSF work. However, it has always been private. The government has never owned the fiber backbones or the local distribution nodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. I wonder what will happen when the courts throw this out
To do this the FCC is stretching the common carrier definition like a Rush Limbaugh in a corset. For net neutrality to really be successful, there needs to be enabling legislation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC