Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Milwaukee city attorney claims Walker’s bill is unconstitutional

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Skip_In_Boulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:04 PM
Original message
Milwaukee city attorney claims Walker’s bill is unconstitutional
Edited on Mon Feb-28-11 08:14 PM by Skip_In_Boulder
Published February 28, 2011 - BizTimes Daily

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s state budget repair bill would be unconstitutional because it would violate the constitutional “home rule” that protects cities and villages from interference in local pensions by the state, according to a legal opinion issued today by Milwaukee City Attorney Grant Langley.

In a letter to Milwaukee Alderman Joseph Dudzik, Langley stated, “… in our judgment, the courts would find the statue unconstitutional on three grounds: first, that it unconstitutionally interferes with and intrudes upon the city’s home-rule authority over its pension plan; second, that given certain vested rights or benefits that have accrued to employees currently in the plan, the statute would constitute an unconstitutional impairment of contract rights under the state and federal constitutions; and third, given these same vested rights or benefits, the proposed statute would violate the due process clauses of the state and federal constitutions because it would abrogate the terms and conditions of the Global Pension Settlement …”
Dudzik had requested Langley’s opinion on the constitutionality of Walker’s plan, which would revoke the collective bargaining rights of thousands of public employees in the state.

After receiving Langley’s opinion, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett today sent a letter to Walker, requesting that Walker seek a legal opinion from the Wisconsin Attorney General on the matter.

The following is the text of Barrett’s letter to Walker:

http://www.biztimes.com/daily/2011/2/28/milwaukee-city-attorney-claims-walkers-bill-is-unconstitutional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think there should also be something said...
about not being able to govern without the consent of the governed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. You know these RW fascists never check the law
Walker will soon be a pariah even to his party goons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. yuppers . . . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Request Walker seek legal opinion from AG ?? Wait, isn't the AG a co-conspirator?
The prank call revealed the AG was working with Walker to try to figure out how to arrest Democrats,
a use of the color of law to abridge fundamental rights for political ends and thus a felony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC