Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charles Koch issues his instructions to the peasants (update 2)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:59 AM
Original message
Charles Koch issues his instructions to the peasants (update 2)
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 09:16 AM by ProSense

Charles Koch issues his instructions to the peasants

by Lefty Coaster

America's most powerful new nobleman Charles G. Koch's has issued his instructions to his retainers in the Congress and the States, and to all of his bands of peasant inquisitors. Koch's instructions were relayed through the nobility's favorite broadsheet the Wall Street Journal.

Why Koch Industries Is Speaking Out

MARCH 1, 2011

By CHARLES G. KOCH

Years of tremendous overspending by federal, state and local governments have brought us face-to-face with an economic crisis.

Charles resents that the government provides services that he and his companies have no need for, and wost of all that the government has the effrontery to expect him and his companies to help pay for those services.

For many years, I, my family and our company have contributed to a variety of intellectual and political causes working to solve these problems. Because of our activism, we've been vilified by various groups. Despite this criticism, we're determined to keep contributing and standing up for those politicians, like Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who are taking these challenges seriously.

Yes he and his brother are determined to roll the clock of our government back 100 years, before socialist evils like the income tax, unions, and modern climate science. Walker is one of Charles' loyal retainers as Walker demonstrated when he was Punked.

<...>

More from Charles

Even though it affects our business, as a matter of principle our company has been outspoken in defense of economic freedom. This country would be much better off if every company would do the same. Instead, we see far too many businesses that paint their tails white and run with the antelope.

This part is gratifying. Charles is admitting that pushing their libertarian politics so forcefully has made them unpopular and hurt business. He wants other corporate leaders to join him in his unpopular stands and take the heat off of Koch Industries.

more


Update 2 to add this comment from Daily Kos:

The Koch Bros have quickly gone from
being invisible puppet masters of the right
to the target of every other protest sign.

The prank call was the tipping point - the offer of a trip to Cali for a really good time and Walker's outstanding reply.

That's some serious toothpaste that got out that can't be put back in the tube.



Updated to counter Koch's bogus attack on government and public employees:

Wisconsin Union Fight Is Really a 15-State GOP Power Grab

by Andy Stern

<....>

2. Wall Street Created the Fiscal Crisis, Not Unions

Public workers, elected officials, unions, or others whom one might want to blame did not create today's fiscal crisis. An already weak and increasingly two-tier economy, dragged down by a 2000-10 jobless decade, globalization, and a lack of real wage growth for a generation, was sunk by greedy big banks and Wall Street. They, abetted by blind regulatory oversight, created irresponsible investment schemes.

When the fiscal tidal wave hit, American workers had exhausted their tools to maintain their standard of living—a second family income, second or third job, more hours worked, credit cards, a stock-market bubble before it burst, home refinancing, home-equity loans, student loans, and additional education. Most states, having used up many of their budget "gimmicks," also fell into a huge new hole, and are still digging out.

And here's a little-noted statistic: According to the Wisconsin Department of Revenue, two-thirds of corporations in the state pay no taxes, and the share of corporate tax revenue funding state operations has fallen by half since 1981.

<...>

5. The Assault on Workers' Rights Is a Republican Choice

<...>

Well, consider this: More than 15 other states are facing Republican initiatives to change their teacher, state employee, and local government bargaining laws, or private sector right-to-work laws.

more


NYT: Former Mortgage Officer Admits to Fraud

The former treasurer of Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corporation, once one of the largest mortgage lenders in the country, admitted to helping run a $1.9 billion fraud scheme that was directed at the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and contributed to the failure of Colonial Bank.

The former treasurer, Desiree Brown, 45, pleaded guilty on Thursday in federal court in Alexandria, Va., to wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiring to commit bank fraud. She also agreed to cooperate with prosecutors in the trial of Lee Farkas, former chairman of Taylor, Bean, on April 4. Ms. Brown also settled civil charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the S.E.C. said.

<...>

Until now, Mr. Farkas, 58, was the only person charged in what the government said was an extensive scheme to deceive financial firms and the Troubled Asset Relief Program by covering up shortfalls at Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, according to the S.E.C. Mr. Farkas was charged in a 16-count indictment in June and faces the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison, according to court papers.

Ms. Brown, of Hernando, Fla., faces up to 30 years in prison, a $250,000 fine and an order to pay restitution to more than 250 victims. She is to be sentenced on June 10.

<...>


William Greider:

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission is better than its reviews but still very disappointing. Its 545-page report represents a powerful, fact-filled indictment of the financial system and the leading players and institutions that produced the national catastrophe. But there is one glaring omission—the massive fraud that occurred on Wall Street.

<...>

For one example of the FCIC’s buried treasures, turn to page 165 and read about the true meaning of “due diligence.” In 2006–07, an auditing firm, Clayton Holdings, was hired to examine some 900,000 mortgages. It found that 255,000 (28 percent) were flawed and should not have been packaged as mortgage-backed securities. Clayton’s president delicately described the high deficiency rate as “a quality control issue.” But the banks went ahead and included nearly 100,000 of the dubious loans in new securities anyway, without informing the buyers. “They knew a significant percentage of the sampled loans did not meet their own underwriting standards or those of the originators,” the FCIC concluded. “Nonetheless, they sold those securities to investors. The Commission’s review of many prospectuses provided to investors found that this critical information was not disclosed.”

This smells like old-fashioned investor fraud. The biggest players were Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley and three leading European banks. The FCIC observed that this sleight-of-hand occurred when the housing market began to collapse and banks were eager to dump their rotten assets. It has provided a wealth of material evidence for the growing flood of investor lawsuits. Even the Federal Reserve is suing financiers to recover on the bad assets it was sold.

Shouldn’t someone go to jail? Determining criminal intent is always difficult. Corporate law is a thicket of exemptions and clever distinctions designed to shield the big boys at the top. If the feds got serious, they would apply the same techniques used against Mafia dons. First “squeeze” lesser players down below—traders, salesmen, accountants—then “turn” them into government witnesses. Build a chain of evidence against those who knew the score and gave the orders. What did the titans know and when did they know it?

<...>





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. And we will watch them shrivel and die, both of them and all that they have worked to steal and then
we will see their hoarded gold be thrown into the streets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Koch family fortunes were made building oil refineries for Joseph Stalin.
They don't like people to know that. They don't like people knowing about ANY of the dirty ways they make their money. They like their privacy and operate behind the screen of fake "citizens'" groups like Americans for Prosperity.

Rare photo of the Koch brothers

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Why Koch Industries is really speaking out
Because they don't have a fucking choice any more. They would have loved to stay hidden, but sadly for them, there are still some actual journalists left, as opposed to the stenographers to power in the corporate media they're used to dealing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. they want to raid the fully funded pension plans in those states!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PACmenDotOrg Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Elections finance laws
Dear Citizens United,

Thank you for making all of this possible.

Love,

The Koch Brothers

www.whatthefuckhaveunionsdonesofar.com

www.pacmen.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Me thinks he protests too much.
odd that two guys who like to remain secret and "above it all" makes a statement like this.

Isn't it interesting that these to obscenely wealthy fools show "solidarity" with walker.

Now what organization also shows solidarity?

fuck the koch brothers and fuck walker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Billionaires whining that life is unfair.
That's really despicable.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Speaking of no one going to jail about mortgage fraud:
The NYT ran a nauseating piece couple of days ago "explaining" why no one had been criminally prosecuted for all the
bankingmortgage fraud.
Gist of their argument was:it is just too much trouble, too expensive, for the government to prosecute and besides, the FBI is SO under staffed right now, what with all this terrorist stuff and all.

Note that the above is talking about criminal, not civil prosecutions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, ProSense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's remember, they also funded the DLC
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 01:00 PM by CrossChris
I don't know if everyone saw this article from '06 someone sent me last week:

http://www.democrats.com/node/7789

The Rightwing Koch Brothers Fund the DLC

Do deep-pocketed "philanthropists" necessarily control the organizations they fund? That has certainly been the contention of those who truck in conspiracy theories about the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations funding liberal and neo-liberal organizations. As for the rightwing, journalists such as Joe Conason and Gene Lyons uncovered that the "vast right wing conspiracy" -- or the New Right network of think tanks, media outlets and pressure groups -- was marshalled under rightwing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife for his Get-Clinton campaign. Prior to the work of Conason and Lyons, Russ Bellant extensively documented in "The Coors Connection" how the Coors Family, Scaife and other wealthy rightwingers have funded the New Right movement since the early '70's. Among these rightwing benefactors are the Koch brothers. But the Kochs have been working both sides of the fence. As Bill Berkowitz writes, the Koch brothers have also been funding the Democratic Leadership Council.

According to SourceWatch, a project of the Center for Media & Democracy, the brothers are "leading contributors to the Koch family foundations, which supports a network of Conservative organizations and think tanks, including Citizens for a Sound Economy, the Manhattan Institute the Heartland Institute, and the Democratic Leadership Council."

Charles Koch co-founded the Cato Institute in 1977, while David helped launch Citizens for a Sound Economy in 1986.

This is no less stunning than if Scaife or the Coors family were funding the DLC. So do the Kochs just throw money at the DLC -- as long as the Council supports a free-market" (i.e. unrestricted/unregulated corporate power) agenda that the Kochs generally agree with. Or is it more than just that -- does this really buttress what Greens and other disaffected liberals contend -- that the DNC has just become a party of "Republicrats", thanks especially to the DLC? They would say that corporate backers like the rightwing/libertarian Kochs have co-opted the Democratic establishment -- a hostile takeover of (what was once) the opposition. (continued at link)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Let's remember the DLC
was a bullshit organization. Still, bringing up a few thousand even $30,000 or $100,000 in donations to the DLC compared to the millions Koch gave to Bush and the Republicans reelection efforts in 2000 and 2004 is like saying is contributions to cancer research makes him an environmentalist. Then there are the millions they're pouring into their astroturf campaign.

The DLC link is based on this 2001 article. Whenever the Koch brothers are called out, someone has to mention this link?

Other than the DLC sucked and were conservative Democrats (Harold Ford is enough proof of that), what's the relevance?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. This DLC article on private/public transfrom '08 cites a report prepared for Koch Bros from '03
The relevance is that if the Koch brothers had given to DLC affiliated Democrats in the past, what's stopping them now? With not much research, I found this Koch-friendly article on private/public partnerships from 2008 that cites work done specifically for the Koch bros.

"Brian Carpenter, Edward Fekpe, and Deepak Gopalakrishna, Performance-Based Contracting for the Highway Construction Industry: An Evaluation of the Use of Innovative Contracting and Performance Specification in Highway Construction, Battelle (prepared for Koch Industries, Inc.), February 2003
www.ncppp.org/resources/papers/battellereport.pdf"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Hmmmm?
"The relevance is that if the Koch brothers had given to DLC affiliated Democrats in the past, what's stopping them now?"

The DLC is dead?

Yes, they sucked and there are still conservative Democrats who suck. Still, the Koch brothers are a little tied up right now trying to kill unions and destroy the country.

So no, the above question is not relevant.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. What happened to all of the politicians who made up the DLC?
And again, the $25,000 the Koch's donated was to sit on the DLC's board of trustees, which indicates they gave a significantly higher amount?

Did all of those politicians affiliated with the DLC stop taking money from their old donors as soon as the DLC was dissolved?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Again. hmmmm?
"What happened to all of the politicians who made up the DLC?"

Do you have evidence of the Koch brothers donating to Democratic politicians? Would be better to expose them than continuing to post a decade-old link to the DLC.

"And again, the $25,000 the Koch's donated was to sit on the DLC's board of trustees, which indicates they gave a significantly higher amount?"

Again, you're talking about a decade-old article linking the Koch's to a bullshit organization.

This seems to be an attempt to make a "Dems do it too" argument that's completely irrelevant to the OP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. If the Koch's are still giving to Dems, that would be extremely relevant to the way they respond.
I would think that information would be extremely relevant to this thread, and that's why I brought it up.

Even if you consider the DLC a "bullshit organization" as you put it, there are former members still in high places in today's Democratic Party. Are they still taking money from the Koch's? The article I cited from 2008 still cites research on selling public entities to private parties, and was prepared for Koch Industries. So as recently as 2008, we've seen documented relevance.

I hope that the Koch's have zero relevance in today's Democratic Party, and I hope that you're essentially right in that my questions have no relevance to your thread. Every time I revisit the facts, I'm more afraid that those questions ARE relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
27. I don't see any of the Democrats getting money from teh Koch brothers
Here are the two Newsmeat.com links:

http://www.newsmeat.com/billionaire_political_donations/Charles_Koch.php
http://www.newsmeat.com/billionaire_political_donations/David_Koch.php

You have to go back to 1988 to find either man giving to a Democrat - and those donations were to James Guest (VT House candidate) and to Bill Bradley( NJ) - and Bradley was pretty liberal. Those were the only ones.

As to the Koch Industries Pac, they gave 9% to Democrats in 2009-2010
Here is the link - http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00236489&cycle=2010

(In the Senate - the Democrats who got money were:
Evan Bayh ($2000), Dorgan($2000), Blanche Lincoln ($15,000), Melancon($5000), Schumer($1000) - of these only Schumer is still in the Senate - and it is silly to argue that $1000 influenced him.
If you look at 2008 - a great year for Democrats - only 15% went to Democrats (in the Senate, only Baucus, Johnson, and Pryor got $5000; Landrieu got $2,500. )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Where is the link for the 2008 article
You only link to the 2003 study. Without the 2008 link, this means nothing. If this was a prominent study, it would be one of many cited - even if the position of the paper is not something Koch would agree with.

As Prosense points out, they gave millions to the Republicans - and the numbers she sited, while significant, do not mean that they had any power over the DLC - which is dead anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. The article is from 2008. The study that article cites is from '03. They were citing Koch research
as late as '08.

If that settles it for you, that's fine. I wish it was settled for me based on "the DLC is 'dead', and the money isn't THAT significant", etc. It most certainly is not.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I'm confused - what article? Did you put the wrong link on the earlier post
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 11:15 AM by karynnj
Again, there is NO 2008 link - so I can't see how they are using the 2003 report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. AH! Wrong link--my mistake! Here is the DLC's article from '08
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=139&subid=274&contentid=252612

DLC | Model Initiatives | June 30, 2008
Public-Private Projects in Transportation

New Dem Play | Creating partnerships with the private sector to build roads and reduce congestion
Where It's Working | New Mexico, Ohio, Michigan, Colorado, Virginia, Texas, Virginia, Illinois, and other states nationwide
Players | State and local officials

More Environment, Energy &
Transportation Policy Plays
Traffic congestion has reached crisis proportions in many of the nation's large metropolitan areas. While improved transit and land use planning can help, expanding the capacity of roads will be a key part of any solution. But states can expect little increase in federal transportation funds for the next six years. Efforts in many states to raise the gas tax to fund transportation programs have also failed. Many state and local transportation departments have made congestion reduction a top priority, but they could do a much better job of cost-effectively building and maintaining roads.

Indeed, while much of the rest of the economy has embraced a wide array of institutional and technological innovations, the process of building and maintaining roads has changed very little in recent years. If states and localities are to effectively solve transportation problems, they will need to look to an array of innovative public-private partnerships, including new toll projects, design-build-maintain contracts, and state-level, performance-based transportation funding.
(continued at link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrossChris Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Looks like the Koch's were much more than donors. They were on the board of trustees.
from the Ameriblog article:

"And for $25,000, 28 giant companies found their way onto the DLC's executive council, including Aetna, AT&T, American Airlines, AIG, BellSouth, Chevron, DuPont, Enron, IBM, Merck and Company, Microsoft, Philip Morris, Texaco, and Verizon Communications. Few, if any, of these corporations would be seen as leaning Democratic, of course, but here and there are some real surprises. One member of the DLC's executive council is none other than Koch Industries, the privately held, Kansas-based oil company whose namesake family members are avatars of the far right, having helped to found archconservative institutions like the Cato Institute and Citizens for a Sound Economy. Not only that, but two Koch executives, Richard Fink and Robert P. Hall III, are listed as members of the board of trustees and the event committee, respectively--meaning that they gave significantly more than $25,000.

The DLC board of trustees is an elite body whose membership is reserved for major donors, and many of the trustees are financial wheeler-dealers who run investment companies and capital management firms--though senior executives from a handful of corporations, such as Koch, Aetna, and Coca-Cola, are included."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. Economic freedom?


Those scum-sucking pigs, Charles and David Koch, have been free to make billions! Who stopped them?

NOBODY! They've made as much money as lax regulations can allow and it's not fucking enough for them?

How about economic freedom for the rest of us? Oh...wait......

It's pure Class warfare from the Kochroach brothers, plain and simple.


"We deserve it. You don't. We're nice, upstanding pasty men who are god's chosen. the rest of you can starve. WE NEED MORE MORE MORE!!!!!!!!"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Great post. Bookmarked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Any truth to this about the Kochs' Wisconsin act?
"...Governor Walker’s union-busting budget plan contains a clause that went nearly un-noticed. This clause would allow the sale of publicly owned utility plants in Wisconsin to private parties (specifically, Koch Industries) at any price, no matter how low, without a public bidding process. The Koch’s have helped to fuel the unrest in Wisconsin and the drive behind the bill to eliminate the collective bargaining power of unions in a bid to gain a monopoly over the state’s power supplies.”

http://www.politicususa.com/en/anonymous-wi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. OMG! IT is running for POTUS!!!
Jesus in a handbasket! Everyone duck for cover! :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. Just one line of Koch can be deadly. This constitutes a WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R for more visibility and disgust. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. It's About "Privitization"...
The Kochroaches don't like paying taxes or unions...and for a reason. They can and are attempting to profit from it. When those teachers and firefighter and sanitation workers are fired they'll be "outsourced" to a subsidiary of one of the koch or another wingnut corporation. They not only want you to pay taxes but they want to rig every rule they can to force the government to put money into their coffers. Bad for business? Maybe for the short term but overall the money these slimeballs have thrown into the political game have returned many dividends and they see the big payoff if they can bust enough unions and get sweetheart, no-bid, long-term deals from their puppets like Walker, Kaisich and others.

Of course kockroaches don't like the light...and they're hoping their money, corporate intimidation and America's short-term memory will let them keep on corrupting and turning this nation into their private country club...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. thanks for this
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC