Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Even Tea Partiers Do Not Support Cutting Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 05:46 AM
Original message
Even Tea Partiers Do Not Support Cutting Social Security
It seems that the efforts of the austerians to cow the public into cutting Social Security and Medicare are not getting traction. And Tea Party adherents are breaking with the Republican party line on this issue.

From the Wall Street Journal:

Less than a quarter of Americans support trimming Social Security or Medicare to tackle the country’s budget deficit, according to a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll that illustrates the challenge facing lawmakers seeking voter support for altering entitlement programs.

The poll, conducted between Feb. 24 and 28, found strong opposition for cuts to these entitlement programs across all age groups and ideologies. Even tea party supporters, by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, declared cuts to Social Security “unacceptable.”….

The survey also found a sharp uptick in desire for the government to do more “to help meet the needs of people.” Just over half of people in the survey backed more government involvement, the highest percentage since February 2009, just after President Barack Obama’s inauguration.

***

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/03/even-tea-party-members-do-not-support-cutting-social-security.html#comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jmaxfie1 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's cause most of them are on it ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Exactly what I was going to say.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why? It's socialist-- these people are dumb. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unexpected consequences when you vote stupidly
They should have thought of that before pushing these bastards through the electorate
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. what you said X1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yup. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. It depends
If they think they're cuts affecting people who are on Social Security now, they're against it. If it involves cuts for people that have barely been born yet, they might have a different opinion.

If you asked the question, "Should the minimum age for a full Social Security benefit be gradually raised from where it is at 67 years of age to 70 years of age fifty years from now?" you'd probably get a different answer than what this poll says. People are usually OK with cuts they don't see impacting them personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Doubtful
Most in America do not believe one should have to work until they're 70 before being eligible to retire. Particularly those who have jobs that demand physical labor. I doubt those who are about to retire now will impose that heavy burden on their children and grandchildren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC