Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have we prepared for this possible scenario on the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case? (gay marriage)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 10:20 PM
Original message
Have we prepared for this possible scenario on the Perry v. Schwarzenegger case? (gay marriage)
The case is going to the Supreme Court next year or in 2013. That is a certainty.

We all assume that the Court will either compel states to legalize gay marriages or say the decision is up to each state.

But maybe not. Imagine with me that the Court might instead say that while states need not have legal gay marriage (unless they wish to do so), that states must offer the equivalent state benefits to gay couples as to married couples. In other words civil unions. Churches and clergies would be free to recognize or not recognize gay marriages.

Of course, that is Separate but Equal and not marriage, nor even desirable, but Court decisions are what they are and I could see the Court doing just that. The Court has been known to hand down compromise rulings on many hotly debated issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe that such a decision could be a huge step in the right direction.
Then, in a few years, the optimal decision could be reached for FULL equal rights to marry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-03-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would take it as a victory
and begin to work on the next phase
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick
I shouldn't have posted this so late last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puregonzo1188 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't foresee anything good coming from this current court.
Not that much good has ever come from the Supreme, with the exception of a twenty period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC