Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wonder what today's Republicans would think of their 1956 platform?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:38 AM
Original message
I wonder what today's Republicans would think of their 1956 platform?
In fact, I wonder what today's Democrats would think?

"In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people's money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative."

While jealously guarding the free institutions and preserving the principles upon which our Republic was founded and has flourished, the purpose of the Republican Party is to establish and maintain a peaceful world and build at home a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares.

We shall ever build anew, that our children and their children, without distinction because of race, creed or color, may know the blessings of our free land.

We believe that basic to governmental integrity are unimpeachable ethical standards and irreproachable personal conduct by all people in government. We shall continue our insistence on honesty as an indispensable requirement of public service. We shall continue to root out corruption whenever and wherever it appears.

We are proud of and shall continue our far-reaching and sound advances in matters of basic human needs—expansion of social security—broadened coverage in unemployment insurance —improved housing—and better health protection for all our people. We are determined that our government remain warmly responsive to the urgent social and economic problems of our people.

We also propose:
Legislation to enable closer Federal scrutiny of mergers which have a significant or potential monopolistic connotations;

The Eisenhower Administration will continue to fight for dynamic and progressive programs which, among other things, will:

Stimulate improved job safety of our workers, through assistance to the States, employees and employers;

Continue and further perfect its programs of assistance to the millions of workers with special employment problems, such as older workers, handicapped workers, members of minority groups, and migratory workers;

Strengthen and improve the Federal-State Employment Service and improve the effectiveness of the unemployment insurance system;

Protect by law, the assets of employee welfare and benefit plans so that workers who are the beneficiaries can be assured of their rightful benefits;

Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of Sex;

Clarify and strengthen the eight-hour laws for the benefit of workers who are subject to federal wage standards on Federal and Federally-assisted construction, and maintain and continue the vigorous administration of the Federal prevailing minimum wage law for public supply contracts;

Extend the protection of the Federal minimum wage laws to as many more workers as is possible and practicable;

Continue to fight for the elimination of discrimination in employment because of race, creed, color, national origin, ancestry or sex;

Provide assistance to improve the economic conditions of areas faced with persistent and substantial unemployment;

Revise and improve the Taft-Hartley Act so as to protect more effectively the rights of labor unions, management, the individual worker, and the public. The protection of the right of workers to organize into unions and to bargain collectively is the firm and permanent policy of the Eisenhower Administration. In 1954, 1955 and again in 1956, President Eisenhower recommended constructive amendments to this Act.

The Republican Party points to an impressive record of accomplishment in the field of civil rights and commits itself anew to advancing the rights of all our people regardless of race, creed, color or national origin.

The Republican Party supports an immigration policy which is in keeping with the traditions of America in providing a haven for oppressed peoples, and which is based on equality of treatment, freedom from implications of discrimination between racial, nationality and religious groups, and flexible enough to conform to changing needs and conditions.

We subscribe to the general objectives of groups seeking to guard the beauty of our land and to promote clean, attractive surroundings throughout America.

We recognize the need for maintaining isolated wilderness areas to provide opportunity for future generations to experience some of the wilderness living through which the traditional American spirit of hardihood was developed.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25838
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cantbeserious Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I Thought I Was Progressive - Maybe I Am Partly A 1956 Republican
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. wow. me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is there any way we can resurrect Ike and run him in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. He'd never get elected.
Too liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why those commie pinkos!. . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
4.  he`s never mentioned by today`s republicans.
lincoln and ike-the two best republican presidents in our history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. They would deny that this was ever part of the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Buncha un-American commie pinko lefty hippies!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. My Dad was county GOP chairman at about that time.
His last GOP vote was Nixon in 68.
He watched in horror the devolution thru Reagan, moral majority, etc.
If he was still around this most recent stuff would have killed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Today's "republicans" aren't invested in this country.
It's a combination of the most restricted country club blended with the John Birch Society, Liberty University (Jerry Falwell), the Mothers' Movement* and John D. Rockefeller (minus the philanthropy).

* Mothers' Movement:
http://www.amazon.com/Women-Far-Right-Mothers-Movement/dp/0226395898
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mothers'_Movement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's the old (and defunct) Republican Party, the one which too many Republicans nowadays
think they still belong to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. According to the John Birch Society, Ike was a "Communist agent."
The present mainstream Republican Party has moved to the Right of the JCS, and would have been identified by the 1950s HUAC as a "Fascist" organization, "UnAmerican" and "subversive".

Hoover's gumshoes would have been crawling all over the likes of Boehner, Cantor and Carribou Barbie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. "The rights of labor unions"!!! But today's Republicans say that unions don't have rights...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantbeserious Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick For Exposure - Needs To Go Viral
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. I wonder what today's "new Democrats" would think of it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Imagine that!
A whole bunch of today's Democrats aren't that liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC