|
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 10:26 AM by PATRICK
been under attack for at least four decades. Anyone or anything with the slightest decency or social value using misdirection or perceived weaknesses in false applications for a clear RW goal. The Post office, as business rags constantly harped on was a poor career choice, outmoded, doomed, ought to be privatized and the "unskilled" workers needed to be kept to starvation wages as machines eliminated them.
Thanks to an illegal nationwide strike it was revealed: the union presented a different picture, the public supported them, and the government that was supposedly responsible for this service drew back its corrupt fangs. Workers flourished to something just below private sector standards, the business flourished, privatization was held down and horrible ideas for the degradation of the service were kept at bay. The constant constant harping in the papers and by private sector businesses about the "monopoly", the "horrible service" and all the jokes(the "going postal" theme has faded into the dull lexicon of old sayings) will continue until the looting wolves get to carve up the system. In smaller countries, always less productive, always charging more, privatization was at least possible. In ours such a disintegration of the sole binding national human network reaching every person and home will be chaos and inflationary failure in a cascade of service meltdown- even with the internet.
We continue to take our arguments and conversations from the corporate media. We all profess to know what that means, but like suckers lined up at the button controlled roulette wheel we place our "strategic" bets and in the end we are all losers. Every factoid, every opinion, every occasional gem popping up from the poisoned well relieves the tiring depressing critique of the well's more consistent garbage.
The air of American debate is poisonous. First questions like "who profits" are obvious but the only real attack seems reserved against our fellow victims.
My father(NALC Branch 210 president) was directly instrumental in the Brennan vs. postal monopoly case. An entrepreneurial couple decided to more cheaply deliver first class mail within Rochester, N.Y. Dad had some colorful discussions with postal carriers working for the Brennans on their off hours(an example of how poorly paid the general carrier was paid back then and how short-sghted even union members can be). Of course delivering the city, profitable mail might be cheaper if the national service didn't also have to deliver a letter at the same rate to the hinterlands, the mandate of universal service- and the restricted to break even budget. By law, which existed in a more pristine form back then, the poor Brennans lost their business and while gaining much victim press and support as crusaders, the press had no appetite to publicize the value of universal service with zero profit for very long.
Because of unions, because of the separation of the USPS from the federal pool, because of the law, because of private unions like the powerful UPS Teamsters who CAN strike and the nationwide popular support of local postal employees, I and many others have had a decent secure job. If someone's letter is mangled or delayed by management's automation failures(or astroturfing just makes it up) the papers will continue their fine tradition of trash-talking the "government" Postal service. We were lucky in the 70's when we could then(not now) bring the nation's finances to its knees, fought back. The slow attrition would have continued and the minimum wages crazy quilt of expensive and incompetent private companies would be the norm- making the break up of AT&T look like a citizen's dream in comparison.
What has been done to the teachers, divide, deride and conquer is plain abominable and indefensible evil on the behalf of a few avaricious monsters and the corrupt hacks who do their bidding. Accepting the memes of corporate goons is something even union members fall for. Without a nationwide catalyst their is little to attack this united corporate front swiftly and decisively.
Is it about education or the children? Is it about a better information service? No and both will suffer outrageously letting the usual suspects set the "debate". And bluntly, you will pay and pay and pay and get nothing in return. In fact, nothing would be a plus.
|