Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-04-11 02:58 PM
Original message |
| So, let's rewind back a few years. Feingold wasn't going to be a viable candidate because of divorce |
|
Well...now he has started his Progressives United...and now that they have thrown out Newt :rofl: as a viable candidate, why NOT Russ as a primary challenge??
|
| JDPriestly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-04-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I joined Progressives United. |
|
Even if there is no challenge to Obama's candidacy, we progressive Democrats need to have a stronger voice in the Democratic Party.
I think the only way we can rein in Obama's readiness to give away our livelihoods to the Kochs and other clients of the Republican Party is to field a progressive candidate like Feingold.
There are other qualified progressive candidates, so we are not limited to Feingold, but Feingold would be great.
|
| former9thward
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-04-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Reagan who was divorced won as President in 1980. |
|
That should have put an end to that limitation on being a candidate where it is Feingold or anyone else.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
