Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have Earnings Actually Declined?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 04:54 PM
Original message
Have Earnings Actually Declined?
snip:
It has been widely observed that over the last several decades wage earnings for the median full-time American male worker have stagnated. For example, in 2009 the median full-time male worker aged 25-64 brought home $48,000—roughly the same as in 1969 after adjusting for inflation.

snip:
Three shifts in the employment landscape are largely responsible for the decline in full-time employment. First, men with jobs are less likely to hold full-time jobs. In 1970, 86 percent of jobs held by prime-age male workers were full-time jobs, compared with 81 percent today. Second, between 1970 and today, the share of men without any earnings at all increased from 6 percent to 18 percent. Third, 2.2 percent of these prime-age men now live in institutions—primarily prisons—and no longer appear in most labor-market statistics.

snip:
The below figure plots the median earnings based on all males aged 25-64, along with the more conventional plot that is based only on those men aged 25-64 that happen to work full-time.

This analysis suggests that earnings have not stagnated but have declined sharply. The median wage of the American male has declined by almost $13,000 after accounting for inflation in the four decades since 1969. This is a reduction of 28 percent!



http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2011/0304_jobs_greenstone_looney.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our countries downward spiral continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. For who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommend - current 'declining unemployment'
Cheer leaders rarely take facts like these into account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why are they showing a chart just for men? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Just a guess...
But I suspect the percentage of women in the workforce has changed significantly enough that no accurate comparison is possible. Just a guess, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. "median earnings" is an AVERAGE...no?
It could be one gazillionaire and a million peons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rgbecker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, No. Median is the 50th of 100, or 500th of 1000.
The middle earner of the group. If you are the "Median" earner, half of everyone else earns more and half earn less.

Average or "Mean" is as you said...Add em all up and divide by the total number counted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tracking our slow, painful, inexorable, ongoing, continuing march to the bottom
Even as the rich get richer and the even as the government aids and abets that transfer of wealth.

We
Are
Well
And
Truly
Fucked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. men's wages have taken the hardest hit, particularly low-income/low-education men & minority men.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 06:35 PM by Hannah Bell
i find this interesting as the pattern is typical of the "ghettoization" process.

increases in women's wages haven't taken up the slack.

destruction of male earning capacity contributes to destabilization of families, increased crime, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:39 PM
Original message
And to make matters worse, this does not take into account
all the things that are taken from paychecks today that were not taken out in the past. Health insurance was usually covered without employee contributions. Pensions were company sponsored, but today you have to contribute money to a 401(k) or other instrument before you ever get the check. This was money that was in our father's pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. We are living in Milton Friedman's world and, predictably, the masses suffer
Keynes was rejected by all sides about the time that Reagan took over and the results are the reason the people who represent the rich liked him so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC