Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sonogram before abortion bill moves ahead in Texas House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:40 PM
Original message
Sonogram before abortion bill moves ahead in Texas House
I wonder if TX will be paying for these tests? Right.


Sonogram before abortion bill moves ahead in Texas House

By Dave Montgomery | The Fort Worth Star-Telegram


AUSTIN — In the first substantive display of their two-thirds majority, House Republicans on Thursday gave preliminary approval to a bill requiring sonograms before abortions.

The bill is expected to easily win final passage Monday, but its ultimate fate remains uncertain because of key differences with a Senate-passed bill.

The bill by Rep. Sid Miller, R-Stephenville, would require doctors to perform sonograms before abortions and give women the chance to see the image and hear the fetal heartbeat. Women would not be required to receive the information, but doctors could lose their licenses if they do not perform sonograms and make them available.


House members voted largely along party lines, 103-42, to pass the bill after hours of debate over two days. In a replay of the Senate's emotional debate, proponents said the measure would give women access to vital information before making a life-changing decision, while opponents denounced it as an intrusive and thinly veiled attack on abortions.

Gov. Rick Perry has made the bill an emergency item to be fast-tracked through the Legislature. Sen. Dan Patrick, R-Houston, who authored the Senate bill, said the House measure is unacceptable to senators but said he hopes to resolve differences between the two versions.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/03/04/109819/sonogram-before-abortion-bill.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Will they also allow the fetus to be a tax write-off? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course the woman will have to pay for it
Part of the plan is to greatly increase the price of the procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. the doctor should send the bill for the sonogram to his congressman or senator who voted for this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Next up: Men to be charged with 111 million counts of murder for every incident of onanism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yea, right. Maybe a female Dem should promote a bill like that,
just for shits and grins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. How about requiring men to pass a test on child support laws
and their enforcement before they have sex? Every time. It could be done on-line or on forms packed with adult products like alcohol and personal lubricants. Women could report anyone who asked for sex without completing the test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Only married men can get Viagra, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. & for the purpose of procreation
cuz anything else would just be sinful and we wouldn't want to let folks going around sinning and thwarting god's order to procreate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. What does my grandmother have to do with this?
Just asking, because she is dead as dead gets.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC