Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Miami Central where Obama went today...partnered with TFA when they became a "turnaround".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:50 PM
Original message
Miami Central where Obama went today...partnered with TFA when they became a "turnaround".
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 10:21 PM by madfloridian
The high school where President Obama appeared today is called a "turnaround." That is considered one of the least extreme of Arne and Obama's reform methods. It entails firing at least 50% of the teachers, firing the principal, and reorganizing the school structure.

Here are more details on the structured requirements of their reform methods. Any resemblance to the policies of Bush I and II is strictly on purpose. We all know it, but we are supposed to act like we don't. We condemned these tactics when Bush and Rod Paige pushed them, but now we are supposed to look the other way.

Reform requirements from the Education website.

#In its application to the state, each school district would be required to demonstrate its commitment to raising student achievement by implementing, in each Tier I and Tier II school, one of the following rigorous interventions:

#Turnaround Model – This would include among other actions, replacing the principal and at least 50 percent of the school's staff, adopting a new governance structure and implementing a new or revised instructional program.

#Restart Model – School districts would close failing schools and reopen them under the management of a charter school operator, a charter management organization or an educational management organization selected through a rigorous review process. A restart school would be required to admit, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend.

#School Closure – The district would close a failing school and enroll the students who attended that school in other high-achieving schools in the district.

# Transformational Model – Districts would address four specific areas: 1) developing teacher and school leader effectiveness, which includes replacing the principal who led the school prior to commencement of the transformational model, 2) implementing comprehensive instructional reform strategies, 3) extending learning and teacher planning time and creating community-oriented schools, and 4) providing operating flexibility and sustained support.


I have read several articles tonight, and none tell me just how many experienced teachers lost their jobs to this method of "reform." Apparently they were replaced by 20 Teach for America teachers.

Another thing I can not find is how much extra it cost the county to "recruit" these TFA teachers. I know they can hire locally for free, just interview and resume'. But it cost several thousand extra to hire TFA teachers who are considered more elite than just old everyday normal certified teachers like I was...like most are.

They are not certified when they are hired, yet they are presented to the public as fully qualified. Something is wrong with the picture.

Here is what I found today, something to while the hours away as I contemplated how easily teachers and other public workers have been sold down the river by both parties.

Obama's rock star greeting.

With help from a $785,000 federal grant, a new principal was brought in, students moved into a new facility and half of the faculty was sent elsewhere.

For 10 years in a row, Central had received D and F grades from the state, making it the worst performing public school in Florida. It was considered dangerous and unkempt. On the verge of having to close the school, Miami-Dade Superintendent Alberto Carvalho instituted some changes. He brought in the state's principal of the year, Douglas Rodriguez, who built an environment of respect and discipline at the school. More than half the teachers were removed and replaced.


More:

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, who also attended the Miami event, said the decision to appear with Bush is an example of Obama's bipartisan approach to education policy.

"We have gone from first in the world to ninth" in graduates, Duncan said in an interview before the event. "We all have to work together. Working across the aisle regardless of politics is important."


They appear to be more concerned about "bipartisanship" than they are about reaching out to and standing up for teachers who are being battered and insulted.

One question I need answered. We were not allowed to be alone with a class unless our teaching credentials were up to date. The TFA folks are given 5 weeks training and sent out to teach. How is a school able to do this? Have they changed the rules?

More:

The Miami Herald mentions the school's partnership with TFA.

Obama picks Miami Central

In 2008, the school hired the state’s top principal and replaced more than half of its teachers. Central also developed a partnership with Teach for America, a national program that places top college graduates into struggling schools.


Here is the source that mentions that 20 TFA teachers were hired.

Students At Miami Central High School Aim High

"Teachers who want to be here at Central," she said.

There are more than 20 of them. They have come from all parts of the country and from all lines of work as a part of the nationwide Teach for America program. James Watkins is one of the teachers. He deferred a promotion on Wall Street to teach his students advanced calculus.

"I made a decision against the recommendation of my closest advisors and peers and I haven't looked back," Watkins said.

He cares, and because of that, so do the students at Central.


I have a feeling that the teachers who were uprooted or fired or laid off probably cared a lot as well. I wonder at the criteria used to decide who was going to go. I wonder if any of them had continuing contracts, which are awarded after 3 years to good teachers...aka tenure. I wonder a lot how much it hurt them inside to be pushed aside and replaced with graduates that the county had to pay to recruit.

Many teachers' lives and careers are on the line now. The last two years have seen respect for teachers at a very low level. The right wing has made it their goal to make teachers sound unworthy. Unfortunately our own party leaders are more concerned with "bipartisanship" than with the devastating effects on teachers and other public employees.

Many believe that getting rid of experienced teachers and replacing them TFA graduates or those from the New Teacher project are simply ploys...that they are ways to hire teachers who have not reached a higher salary level.

Teach for America. A way to replace experienced, higher-salaried teachers?

On top of failing to make a dent in poverty, Teach for America actually detracts from social justice by hurting real teachers. Teach for America students take low, entrance-level pay while also receiving a government subsidy for their salary in the form of Americorps stipends. Schools lay off teachers and then hire Teach for America teachers to fill positions that real teachers would otherwise be filling. Teach for America teachers are undercutting the wage needs of real teachers and causing them to be laid off as a result.

Imagine this: a well-off college student takes a subsidized teaching position at an impossibly low wage and displaces actual teachers who might already be struggling to get by — all for social justice!

For anyone who has any concern for labor rights, this is extremely abusive. Not undercutting wage demands of often unionized workers is rule number one of how to be a serious social justice advocate.


Today our president appeared at this school which laid off over half its teachers, which hired 20 TFA teachers in an apparently contractual deal with a private company. He stood with Jeb Bush whose foundation has as its goal the privatization of education.

And I am not supposed to show concern and worry that there is no opposing party speaking out for teachers, other public employees, and their unions.

There is a difference, a big one, in sort of defending teachers and unions when asked specifically about it....and in actually speaking out firmly for us and making it an important stand-alone issue.

Defending public employees and their unions in a casual way is not enough. The other side is relentless, and we are way too noncommittal.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. nothing is "wrong with this picture" - it looks just like it is designed to look nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. THAT's their methodology?
Fire half the teachers and the principal?

Sounds more like a way to instill fear in the existing teachers, thus making them more "compliant"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The 4th may be less change depending on how it is implemented.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 10:24 PM by madfloridian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. And yes, it instills fear most definitely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Turnarounds here fire at least 50% of all staff... they even fire the lunch ladies.
Because THAT'S what will help our students to achieve!!!!!!

At a press conference on Tuesday, Rahm Emanuel wouldn't commit to sending his children to Chicago Public Schools upon their return to town, sparking a round of criticism from rivals Gery Chico and Miguel del Valle and a spate of press about the issue. That may have sapped coverage from another topic Emanuel broached two mornings ago: his position on school "turnarounds."

Turnarounds are among the most dramatic steps CPS has taken in recent years in its attempts to improve district schools that exhibit chronically low performance. During a turnaround, school staffers -- all adults in the building, from the principal and teachers to the building engineer and lunch ladies -- are fired and asked to reapply for their old jobs. CPS contracts with an outside organization like the Academy for Urban School Leadership (AUSL), with whom Emanuel met on Tuesday, to take over school operations or tasks district officials with managing the turnover process. A new principal is hired and the school building is upgraded. Students are supposed to be kept in place during a turnaround, unlike when a school is closed, consolidated, or phased-out, the other three school restructuring policies the Board of Education and CPS' top brass have pursued in recent years.

Underlying the turnaround process is the idea that only whole-cloth changes to the staff and culture at struggling schools will enable student improvement. (A major study from the Chicago Consortium on School Research about CPS' turnarounds is due out soon. Press accounts find slow, mixed results, though turnaround backers point to some improved test scores and in-school discipline.)

http://www.progressillinois.com/posts/content/2010/12/09/school-turnaround


This isn't just a Republican vs. Democrat issue anymore. They appear to be playing for the same team: Operation Destroy Public Education
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oops, responded to wrong post.
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 10:23 PM by madfloridian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm actually in favor of that one.
If there are other successful public schools nearby, we should give students the opportunity to try them out provided all funds go towards a public and not private education.

Sometimes changing an environment can make a difference in how a student engages and responds. I've picked up a couple of tuitioned students from neighboring schools that I was warned about, but they have turned out to be very good students.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. By tuition, do you mean vouchers? Or are you in a private school.
Yes, the 4th can be better, but some very good principals are lost under that one as well. The principal is sacrificed for bipartisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. No not vouchers. Public schools can pay tuition to one another.
Before I worked in an urban setting, I worked in a smaller town. Sometimes in the smaller towns or rural settings, students have to attend another neighboring public school because, for instance, they are special ed and their needs cannot be met at their closest school. So what will happen is that another public school will take the child in and provide the educational service... the tax dollars follow the student to the other public school in the form of a "tuition amount."

From what I understand, it's the same principle here. All taxpayer funds will flow to a public school.

This is the least damaging of the education deform requirements from the DoE. It does not put public funds in the hands of private enterprise or corporations. But you are right; the downside is that you still lose the principal, which is unfair if the principal actually was good at his or her job.

On the bright side, I have found that good principals usually land positions elsewhere. In fact, it is probably easier for a good principal to land a new gig than it is for an experienced teacher to find a position at another school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Yes, in FL also the money follows the student....but now it goes to charters as well.
Many of which like Imagine Charters are not non-profit, though they claim to be. And they are expanding vouchers here though they were deemed unconstitutional several years ago. So that means the money will leave public schools and follow the student to charter or in many cases private through voucher.

A sure way to destroy public schools is to defund them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I am very worried. Yes, they even fire other staff at times, even custodians and lunch personnel.
Which is definitely not very smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Because we all know the lunch ladies have a HUGE impact on achievement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. WP column wonders.
"Obama last month expressed support for the Wisconsin teachers, who have been protesting to keep the collective bargaining rights (and that of other public employees) that the governor, Scott Walker, is intent on taking away. Wisconsin teachers already made concessions on monetary issues.

Obama said: "Some of what I’ve heard coming out of Wisconsin, where you’re just making it harder for public employees to collectively bargain, generally seems like more of an assault on unions. And I think it’s very important for us to understand that public employees, they’re our neighbors, they’re our friends. These are folks who are teachers and they’re firefighters and they’re social workers and they’re police officers.”

So, at this point in time, when teachers in Wisconsin and elsewhere feel besieged, I’m wondering why Obama and Education Secretary Arne Duncan are flying to Florida to be with Republicans who have been part of the attack force. Why, when teachers are fighting for union rights, does the president decide to spend time with anti-teachers union school reformers?

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/school-turnaroundsreform/obamas-questionable-trip-to-mi.html?wprss=answer-sheet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The answer to her question has become...
...pretty clear to me. The teaching profession, as we know it, has become unaffordable...unsustainable, to use current jargon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Teaching as a profession will soon be gone. We do not value education.
Our country simply does not care enough to provide good public education anymore.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Big money doesn't chase what
is unaffordable or unsustainable. It goes after what is profitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's how it done. Big money. TFA to "triple South FL impact"
http://www.knightblog.org/teach-for-america-to-triple-south-florida-impact

Over the next five years, Teach for America will more than triple its number of teachers in Miami-Dade county with the help of a $6 million grant from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. By 2014, some 350 Teach for America educators will reach more than 25,000 students in Miami-Dade public schools."


Think about the everyday ordinary fully trained teachers they will replace? Adding to the local unemployment?

"The achievement gap in this community's schools is a massive gap. But the good news is it's fixable – and Teach for America knows how to do it," Scholl said Thursday night. "Today, (Teach For America educators) are changing the culture of our schools, classroom by classroom. Tomorrow, we expect them to stick around as alumni and be the educators and advocates Miami-Dade needs to continue to move this community forward."


Oh, sure. Really. I am sure the teachers you guys are replacing also knew how to teach and inspire. They were just not given a chance under the new "reforms."

It angers me when TFAers come across as superior.

How in the hell can our party stand by and let teachers be dissed this way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. This is all I have found about the protests outside the school.
Not a word on any news I have seen.

"But Obama's decision to appear with Bush, viewed as a principal Republican driver of education reform in Florida and nationwide, didn't sit well with about 200 teachers who mounted a demonstration outside the school, about six miles north of downtown Miami.

"We were dismayed that President Obama would choose to be at Central Senior High with former Gov. Bush, who worked to close this very school," said Karen Aronowitz, president of the local teachers' union, United Teachers of Dade, while the president spoke inside."

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/mh-obama-wasserman-schultz-20110304,0,6024831.story

If the news doesn't cover it, I guess that means it never happened. You know, like the huge anti-war protests in 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
18. kr. and there's no evidence that these "turnarounds" have raised performance anywhere, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. That's the truth, but they keep barreling on ahead with "reform"
without any proof it works. The decision was made, to hell if the changes work.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. K&R, madfloridian
Obama's trip to Florida seems soooo untimely to me. And to cohort with the Jebster.

I'd be curious to know if TFAers stick around after 3 years - I'm thinking it's gotta be quite a revolving door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. It was poor judgement. Showed lack of understanding of teachers' pain right now.
Not a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. It is humiliating to teachers for TFAers to be held up as smarter and better.
They are not. I wonder how they managed to make the script so powerful..that being TFA is better than being a teacher?

The money and power of the corporations behind them?

"It’s also interesting to look at the 990 for the KIPP Foundation, the charter school chain led by Richard Barth, a former Edison vice president and TFA staffer who also happens to be Kopp’s husband. Barth made more than $300,000 in pay and benefits, bringing the Kopp/Barth household income to almost $600,000 for their work with TFA and KIPP. (In a 2008 article, the New York Times dubbed Kopp and Barth as “a power couple in the world of education, emblematic of a new class of young social entrepreneurs seeking to reshape the United States’ educational landscape.”)

http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/24_03/24_03_TFA.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. hmph!
The only thing those two 'young social entrepreneurs' are seeking to reshape is their financial portfolio! I am just as disgusted as are you, madfloridian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Now Bill Gates is going to wire TFA teachers with earbuds...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Bill Gates and his money are like a cancer in the American education system
He has NO idea what he is doing, but hell, has that stopped him before?

I hate to break it to him, but public schools are NOT like a software company. He has NO experience, NO qualifications, and NOTHING to recommend his opinions despite his money.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. He's RICH as four feet up a bull's ass. That's all that matters in Amerika the Profitable.
REC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. They have found a way to polish a turd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
32. WTF?!
The naked privatization of the nation's school systems is nauseating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radhika Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Devious Conflation: No Progress without Corporations
I acknowledge HUGE problems with the Los Angeles Schools. I'm in the Adult Division, but know lots about K-12. Many of them need a turnaround. Hell, the whole city, state and society needs a turnaround. But I am frustrated with the deceptive national message that people like Obama, Arne and TFA are propagating. It's way more devious than a little bit of education tweakery. They say: When schools like Central turnaround it's because something unique and critically different has been introduced. And that something is Capitalism, union free if possible. The changes are magically NOT due to teaching practices, leadership and an open attitude on the part of the community. It's because dreaded public sector governance has been kicked out on it's a*s. (Of course, when charter school FAIL, they can just dump the kids that are dragging down the metrics.)

New Rules: Capitalism is the Cure-All. Socialism is the Sickness. Reagan would be pleased. Bill Gates, Eli Broad are dancing in glee. Even Scott Walker, Beck and Bachman would be pleased, except, you know, Obama is a black Kenyan Muslim Marxist out to destroy Amerika. Wall Street sees a bundle of cash just sitting there waiting to be snatched and securitized and sold around the world. And lobbyists will help ensure things remain that way.

I like reform. If there are Best Practices, use them. If there is Good Accounting Practices, use them. But use them within the People's Commons. If there are excellent teachers and administrators out there, hire them and allow them to be excellent in support of the public commons. The American people have fewer and fewer institutions and assets that serve them and their families. We barely own roads, parks and bridges anymore. And now we are sloughing off a key institution, into the hands of the Corporatists. We the People get told Tough S**T, this is the game now. Play it or die.

Why all this ginned-up public sector rage? I think its simple. We don't matter to the moguls who matter: global corporations, Wall Street and big banks. The corporatists are totally not interested in employing our children. It's better and cheaper to employ the children of China, Malaysia, India. So why educate and heal Americans? And as for sales? Many of the biggest corps see developing nations the real growth sector.

I wonder what the 5-week elites (smile) think about the teachers they replace. Did they drink the KoolAid? Do they mock the ones they arrogantly replaced? Do they realize they are the temporary tool of bored billionaires whose ultimate goal is to control the world. And when Billy-G launches his robots and Virtual School, they'll be out too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC