Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rubio plans to fight EPA water regulations for Florida

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 09:22 AM
Original message
Rubio plans to fight EPA water regulations for Florida
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/content/rubio-plans-fight-epa-water-regulations-florida

Sen. Marco Rubio is planning to try to insert a measure in the forthcoming budget resolution that would bar the EPA from implementing water pollution rules that business groups in Florida oppose.

The move, certain to draw criticism from environmentalists, mirrors an effort by U.S. Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Tequesta. The rules are the product of contentious legal battle in Florida in which the EPA agreed to set new limits on how much nutrient pollution is allowed into waterways. Critics say the regulations will be too costly. Even Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson has worked to get the EPA to hold off.

When Rooney attached his amendment to the House budget deal (which was pared back to a two-week stop-gap for now) Rubio expressed support and indicated he would try the same. Now people close to him confirm he is looking at doing so.

“At a time when our state is facing double-digit unemployment and our families are struggling with the effects of a prolonged recession, the last thing we need is another Washington mandate that will cost billions, destroy jobs and increase daily costs," said Rubio, who raised the issue as a candidate last year.

(end snip)

Gee, we now hear from the Florida Tea bagger media darling. Who's your sugar daddy? Hmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rubio has turned out to be at least as bad as I thought.
Who knew that "in times of economic hardship" people should be deprived of clean water? Just fucking brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katnapped Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You do realize
You can BUY water in the store now, right?

(:sarcasm: in case that went over anyone's head)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And that means the market should be cornered by the Koch brothers
along with everything else? Not that I think water should even be for sale in bottled form, but this water issue is going to be everyone's problem when all of a sudden only a few entities own it and we will all be paying through the nose for it.

Enjoy your stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. ROFL
He's an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. The potential costs are exaggerated
but it will be expensive if implemented. As a scientist in this field, I have to say the rule is a bit heavy handed when applied statewide. A phased application of the new rule with some flexibility for adjustment to a more natural ambient standard would seem proper. Some places in FL function as natural nutient sinks and have higher levels of nutrients on their own. There are plenty of pollution problems here and it would be good to see them addressed, but I think a little more judgement and flexibility in timing and approach would be an improvement over this rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. There it is. That's it. That's it. (with respects to the great Ted Lewis)
Edited on Sun Mar-06-11 08:12 AM by timtom
Been waiting for his first move.

I believe, by the way, that tea-baggers hate regulation. I believe this will play well with them.

To see my Ted Lewis reference go here to 1:26

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4BSwpMwT1M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Rubio: In favor of unsafe water standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC