Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seal product ban based on emotion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 09:34 AM
Original message
Seal product ban based on emotion
Seal product ban based on emotion

I was born and raised in Southeastern Alberta. The largest body of water in the region was Pakowki Lake, which is officially listed as “intermittent.” In an exceptionally rainy year, it might raise its status to “slough.” But in the 65 million years since mammals replaced reptiles as the planet’s dominant animal form, Pakowki has been full probably only half-a-dozen times.

If there is a drier part of Canada, I don’t know it. And if there is a spot which has less in common with the ice floes off the coast of Newfoundland, you’d be hard-pressed to find it. Still, I would defend without hesitation the right of Canadian sealers to earn a living each spring against the hysteria and hand wringing of environmentalists and animal rights activists, particularly those from the European Union.

At present, the EU bans all Canadian seal products, except those harvested by Inuit using traditional methods. Like so many things enviro and activist, this ban is based on emotion as much or more than reason and fact.

Two years ago, when the European Parliament was debating the ban, it was told by the European commission that 98% of the seals harvested annually in the hunt were killed in keeping with the EU’s standards for humane animal slaughter. That’s roughly the same percentage as calves killed humanly in Europe’s own veal industry.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2011/03/04/lorne-gunter-seal-product-ban-based-on-emotion/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stargleamer Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. And our repulsion over the murder of humans is based on
logic and reason?

Just because we aren't consistant in who we choose to protect, what with cows and pigs, etc. not receiving much protection at all, doesn't mean we should not protect those from harm. Despite whatever economic pressures people find themselves under in capitalist societies, we still don't want them to have to sell their organs to feed themselves. We do draw lines in the sand. And animal rights activists are generally very consistant--they're opposed to veal as well, and they try in their own ways to get us all to be consistant, with an ethic of reducing the suffering of others, human and nonhuman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC