Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am getting emails about "simple water fuel device" - anyone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:54 PM
Original message
I am getting emails about "simple water fuel device" - anyone
here know about this?

URL:

http://www.simplewaterfuel.com/?hop=dormer

You supposedly hook up this device to your car, van, truck, ATV and it saves you 67% (in terms of your need for gasoline or diesel.)

I'd love to hear what people here think.

It was an ecology group that sent me the link - they do not stand to gain from promoting the product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ken_Fish Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scam.
mythbusters tested them. A cursory look at their schematics show they can not provide any significant benefit. The last one I saw was endothermic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are the emails from Nigeria? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. if it's too good to be true, it probably is...
if it's too good to be true, and it's on the internet, then run the other way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just because they say they are ecological doesn't mean
that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I trust the group sending this out, but it looks like they need someone
With some science behind their thinking to examine what they should support and what they
should avoid supporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Are these the same devices that...
"Big Oil does not want you to know about"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Red flag
Usually when I see something that sounds too good to be true, I do a search with the name of whatever it is with the word scam attached. Usually that brings up a number of links to look at that will give me the info I need to make a decision. This time when I did it, it sure looked like whoever has designed the first website ALSO designed websites 'discussing' whether or not this is a scam. That is disappointing to me personally as I will now have to rethink how to search out scams.

Will check back to read other responses but just based on that alone, I'd stay away from it. No one I found with this initial search would say what happens to the engine when this magic flows thru it over time. That would be something to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Scam. While technically accurate - you can separate oxygen and hydrogen with a car battery
Edited on Sat Mar-05-11 02:09 PM by Edweird
(in fact DC is the way to go if you need hydrogen by itself) the quantity you're going to get from a mason jar will be tiny and insufficient for anything. I knew a guy that was trying to build a "smack's booster" (or something like that) and, of course, it failed. In the instructions they tell you to alter your fuel map to lean out your engine because of the hydrogen - this is what will get you any increase in mileage, but it also makes engine damage more likely. A too lean engine can burn a hole in your pistons and destroy your engine. Also you run the risk of sucking water into your engine. A "hydraulic'ed" engine is also scrap at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Definitely wanna avoid ruining the car's engine.
Thanks for the explanatory points you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Conservation of Energy
http://library.thinkquest.org/2745/data/lawce1.htm

Energy in a system may take on various forms (e.g. kinetic, potential, heat, light). The law of conservation of energy states that energy may neither be created nor destroyed. Therefore the sum of all the energies in the system is a constant.

You're going to use more energy electrolyzing hydrogen from water than you retrieve by burning said hydrogen. It's kind of like expecting a windmill powered generator on the roof of an electric car to recharge the battery as it drives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. If it's indigo it might work - as long as it's quantum indigo
Just kidding!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. The first law of themodynamics: there is no free lunch.
Edited on Sat Mar-05-11 02:19 PM by MilesColtrane
The energy required to split water molecules (into HHO) exceeds the energy recouped by burning it.

You can run your car on water, but your electric bills will exceed what you're saving on gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. not this one again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. you're wasting energy
by even reading the email. A quick delete should be more efficient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. This kind of BS went around back in the 1970's, too
when gas prices climbed steeply, both in 1973 and 1979. But dontcha know, the oil industry has paid Detroit off to keep effective technology from being put in our cars?!!

I guess it'll have to be a worldwide conspiracy when the story is being retold today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC