Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bradley Manning's forced nudity to occur daily

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:25 PM
Original message
Bradley Manning's forced nudity to occur daily
Glenn Greenwald in Salon

<http://www.salon.com/news/torture/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2011/03/05/manning>

"brig officials now confirm to The New York Times that Manning will be forced to be nude every night from now on for the indefinite future -- not only when he sleeps, but also when he stands outside his cell for morning inspection along with the other brig detainees. They claim that it is being done "as a 'precautionary measure' to prevent him from injuring himself."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is torture. This is a crime against humanity. And those responsible should be prosecuted.
Edited on Sat Mar-05-11 04:28 PM by highplainsdem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. OK, so if he kills himself
than that will be OK and there won't be any blame assigned to anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Greenwald answered that:
Has anyone before successfully committed suicide using a pair of briefs -- especially when under constant video and in-person monitoring? There's no underwear that can be issued that is useless for killing oneself? And if this is truly such a threat, why isn't he on "suicide watch" (the NYT article confirms he's not)? And why is this restriction confined to the night; can't he also off himself using his briefs during the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. Who knows the ingenuity of the human mind?
If it were a terror attack, they'd be expected to anticipate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. So you've swallowed the propaganda, then?
1. That he is suicidal (and who wouldn't be after the way he's been treated)
2. That his continued mistreatment is justified by his being suicidal
3. That his continued mistreatment is A.O.K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Why is it propaganda?
Have you proof he is not suicidal? But more to the point, if he does kill himself, you'd blame no one, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. Not surprising you fall for the ruse.
This is to humiliate and punish only. It is not for his safety. He is under constant observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. So if he kills himself, you will not blame anyone?
Were this not undertaken, and he killed himself, you wouldn't be blaming anyone, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Unfortunately, that is standard procedure in many, if not most, civilian jails and prisons too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. this is the first time I have ever heard of enforced nudity in ANY american jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moondog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. With respect, the fact that you have never heard of it
simply means that you have, thus far, led a very protected life, far from the military; and far from jails, prisons and other confinement facilities.

I mean this in the most positive, and congratulatory kind of way.

But this also means that you really do not understand whereof you speak. Once again, with respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. with respect, I grew up in the military, and spent more time with them than you can ever imagine,
so, however respectful, your comment about my "protected life" will be greeted with gales of hysterical laughter when I repeat it to my associates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moondog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. My resume matches yours, and exceeds it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Most psych workers don't know that forced sterilization is still legal, but it is...
in many states. It hasn't been used here in forever, but technically we can still petition a judge for it. There are a lot of nasty policies in effect that people just don't realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moondog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. You have NO IDEA what the other poster's resume consists of
You're just bloviating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moondog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Think what you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Wayyyy too diplomatic. Try talking out his ASS. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine_Nurse Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Well there is currently a lawsuit here in Maine for the same treatment...
except she is arguing that she wasn't suicidal (IIRC). If she was suicidal, the policy supports the actions that were taken against her. Nearly identical to Manning in fact. No blanket, no clothes, etc. Except they strapped her into a chair.

Seriously, this is common suicide watch precautions in the majority of correctional institutions here. I'm in a psych hospital and we don't do it that way, but the police do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. But Manning has NOT been placed on a suicide watch...
...because that would require the approval of the Brig psychiatrist, who has not found reason so support that move. Indeed, that's why the previous commandant wound up resigning, because he ordered Manning placed on a suicide watch without the required approval of the brig psychiatrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. REC!
This torture is so wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope this gets lots of media coverage. I just e-mailed Congressman Jay Inslee
my current rep, and Congressman Jim McDermott, my former rep, to ask them to stand w/Dennis in being allowed to see Manning.

I understand one gives up rights when joining the military, but this is torture, and I don't think we feel they should give up the right to humane treatment and human decency. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds like jail to me. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. So this is typical, standard operating procedure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. let's play make the (gay man) stand naked outside his cell nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. oh, but it's alright, because
1. it's happening under the tender mercies of the Obama Administration
2. Bradley is a bad, BAD boy and needs punishment!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
39. +1 government homophobia at it's finest n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. can someone please ask Obama about this shit? or at least his spokesmodel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. I heard someone ask Gibbs about it a couple of months back . ..
. . .and Gibbs gave an evasive referral back to the authorities at Quantico. Obama ALREADY KNOWS ABOUT THIS, and apparently approves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #31
40. of course, but he needs to say it for those who aren't paying attention: we torture our own people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. hmm, "possible suicide:???? guess they plan on him "suiciding" one day--like hanging himself with
his hands tied behind his back???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. and the pervs who thought up this delightful little humiliation? wonder how tightly wrapped they
are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Don't Ask, Don't Tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Where are all our Great and Competent Human Rights Lawyers?
Where are the they? Where are the Organizations who look into the mistreatment of "high-profile" American Captures...? Advocates for Prisoners Rights? Constitutional Lawyers who should be helping Glenn Greenwald? Where IS everyone?

:wtf: is going on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
25. Maybe the officer in charge likes to look at the private's privates.
Sounds like those guys are some more "bad apples?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I mean, REALLY? Just how Orwellian can we get?
<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/world/05manning.html?_r=2>

"Lieutenant Villiard said the new rule on clothing, which would continue indefinitely, had been imposed by the brig commander, Chief Warrant Officer Denise Barnes. He said that he was not allowed to explain what prompted it “because to discuss the details would be a violation of Manning’s privacy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC